Fast Dynamic Voluntary Contractions Enhance Corticospinal Facilitation of the Human Diaphragm: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Abstract
In limb muscles, corticospinal excitability is modulated by motor context, with greater facilitation during movement initiation and dynamic contractions than during sustained isometric activation. Whether this applies to the human diaphragm remains uncertain, given the hybrid automatic-voluntary control and continuous activity of respiratory motoneurones. To determine whether corticospinal excitability of the human diaphragm is influenced by the dynamics of voluntary inspiratory contraction at a given level of inspiratory mouth pressure, nine healthy participants (3 women, 6 men; age 23-39 years) performed inspiratory efforts against an occluded mouthpiece. Diaphragm motor evoked potentials (Di-MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from validated chest surface sites at end-expiration with the airway occluded, at rest, during sustained static inspiratory efforts at graded fractions of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (Pi,max), and during dynamic inspiratory efforts matched for pressure (20% Pi,max) but differing in rate of pressure development (slow vs. fast). Static efforts increased Di-MEP amplitude and shortened latency in a pressure-dependent manner. Slow dynamic efforts produced similar facilitation to static efforts. Fast dynamic efforts elicited greater facilitation, with increased amplitude and shortened latency. Corticospinal excitability of the diaphragm is modulated by contraction dynamics, with rapid efforts inducing additional facilitation beyond force alone.
Related
- Dietary nitrate does not alter the rate of torque development during maximal voluntary isometric or electrically evoked tetanic contractions in young men or women
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in Athletes: Optimizing Athletic Performance and Sleep Quality Through Neuromodulation
- Mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation
- Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: optimizing dose, spacing, targeting, and durability rather than speed alone
- Robot-Assisted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Cortical Topography
BibTeX
@article{demoule2026fast,
title = {{Fast Dynamic Voluntary Contractions Enhance Corticospinal Facilitation of the Human Diaphragm: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study}},
author = {Alexandre Demoule and Eric Verin and Capucine Morélot-Panzini and Christian Straus and Thomas Similowski},
journal = {Physiological Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.14814/phy2.70905},
url = {https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-05835486v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Fast Dynamic Voluntary Contractions Enhance Corticospinal Facilitation of the Human Diaphragm: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
AU - Alexandre Demoule
AU - Eric Verin
AU - Capucine Morélot-Panzini
AU - Christian Straus
AU - Thomas Similowski
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - Physiological Reports
DO - 10.14814/phy2.70905
UR - https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-05835486v1
AB - In limb muscles, corticospinal excitability is modulated by motor context, with greater facilitation during movement initiation and dynamic contractions than during sustained isometric activation. Whether this applies to the human diaphragm remains uncertain, given the hybrid automatic-voluntary control and continuous activity of respiratory motoneurones. To determine whether corticospinal excitability of the human diaphragm is influenced by the dynamics of voluntary inspiratory contraction at a given level of inspiratory mouth pressure, nine healthy participants (3 women, 6 men; age 23-39 years) performed inspiratory efforts against an occluded mouthpiece. Diaphragm motor evoked potentials (Di-MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from validated chest surface sites at end-expiration with the airway occluded, at rest, during sustained static inspiratory efforts at graded fractions of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (Pi,max), and during dynamic inspiratory efforts matched for pressure (20% Pi,max) but differing in rate of pressure development (slow vs. fast). Static efforts increased Di-MEP amplitude and shortened latency in a pressure-dependent manner. Slow dynamic efforts produced similar facilitation to static efforts. Fast dynamic efforts elicited greater facilitation, with increased amplitude and shortened latency. Corticospinal excitability of the diaphragm is modulated by contraction dynamics, with rapid efforts inducing additional facilitation beyond force alone.
SN - 2051-817X
ER -