Basis-set error bounds for first-quantised quantum simulation of chemistry
Abstract
In quantum simulation of electronic structure it is often expected that the estimate of the ground energy converges to the continuum basis limit at a rate of πͺ(Nβ1) for a basis of size N. This has been found in analytical and numerical studies, but without a rigorous treatment of the error in the quantities considered in quantum algorithms. Here we show the πͺ(Nβ1) scaling of the error for a wide range of cases needed for quantum simulation of chemistry. We show the error in the ground energy scales as πͺ(Nβ1) for plane-wave as well as spatial grid bases. For the spatial grid we consider both a periodic system and a non-periodic system with open boundaries. For time evolution, our bound on the error in the state itself is weaker than πͺ(Nβ1), but we show that the error in observables scales as πͺΜ(Nβ1) in important cases. In particular, we may consider a smoothed observable that describes the position of particles. We show that this error scales as πͺ(Nβ5/3+tNβ1) for time t, again both for plane-wave and spatial grid bases. For the non-periodic grid case we use a condition that the true evolution would not result in significant leakage past the boundaries, which introduces basis error unrelated to the resolution of the discretisation. We also show the error in the kinetic energy of a particle scales as πͺ((t+log N)/N) for the plane-wave and grid bases. Together, these results show that πͺ(Nβ1) scaling of the error holds for many of the relevant cases for quantum algorithms (with a trivial log factor for kinetic energy).
Related
- Nonorthogonal variational quantum simulation for quantum chemistry
- Tensor Networks for Materials Simulation and Quantum Chemistry
- Spatial Discretization Error for Quantum Chemistry Simulation
- Surface chemistry as data for level-set simulation of etching and deposition
- Realistic Simulation of Valence-band Photoemission Spectra by using First-principles Calculations on the Basis of FLAPW Method
BibTeX
@misc{berry2026basisset,
title = {{Basis-set error bounds for first-quantised quantum simulation of chemistry}},
author = {Dominic W. Berry and Arkin Tikku and Sophia Simon and Ryan Babbush},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35205},
eprint = {2610.35205},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35205},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Basis-set error bounds for first-quantised quantum simulation of chemistry
AU - Dominic W. Berry
AU - Arkin Tikku
AU - Sophia Simon
AU - Ryan Babbush
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.35205
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35205
AB - In quantum simulation of electronic structure it is often expected that the estimate of the ground energy converges to the continuum basis limit at a rate of πͺ(N^β1) for a basis of size N. This has been found in analytical and numerical studies, but without a rigorous treatment of the error in the quantities considered in quantum algorithms. Here we show the πͺ(N^β1) scaling of the error for a wide range of cases needed for quantum simulation of chemistry. We show the error in the ground energy scales as πͺ(N^β1) for plane-wave as well as spatial grid bases. For the spatial grid we consider both a periodic system and a non-periodic system with open boundaries. For time evolution, our bound on the error in the state itself is weaker than πͺ(N^β1), but we show that the error in observables scales as πͺΜ(N^β1) in important cases. In particular, we may consider a smoothed observable that describes the position of particles. We show that this error scales as πͺ(N^β5/3+tN^β1) for time t, again both for plane-wave and spatial grid bases. For the non-periodic grid case we use a condition that the true evolution would not result in significant leakage past the boundaries, which introduces basis error unrelated to the resolution of the discretisation. We also show the error in the kinetic energy of a particle scales as πͺ((t+log N)/N) for the plane-wave and grid bases. Together, these results show that πͺ(N^β1) scaling of the error holds for many of the relevant cases for quantum algorithms (with a trivial log factor for kinetic energy).
ER -