Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Robotics and AI

HemiBot: design and technical validation of an adaptive Robotic coaching system for Unilateral Spatial Neglect rehabilitation

  1. 1Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Abstract

Introduction: Robot-mediated neuro-motor rehabilitation offers intensive, repeatable, and objectively monitored therapy, yet existing systems rarely integrate automated session management, real-time per-repetition scoring, and data-driven adaptive difficulty progression within a single non-contact architecture. This work presents HemiBot (Hemineglect roBot), a ROS 2 software stack implementing a fully automated coaching pipeline for semicircular arm-pointing exercises on the TIAGo mobile manipulator (PAL Robotics), targeting post-stroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), in which patients fail to orient toward or interact with stimuli in the contralesional hemispace.

Methods: The robot’s end effector moves into the neglected hemispace as an exogenous attentional cue while the participant actively reaches toward it with the affected arm. The system extends a skeletal tracking framework with a Behavior Tree orchestrating exercise execution and per-repetition metric computation, a Coach node performing session-level adaptive difficulty progression, Italian empathetic text-to-speech feedback, and a scoreboard for therapist supervision. The scoring metric combines arm-alignment angle and hand–end-effector distance in a logical AND gate, yielding a normalized 0–100 score partitioned into three performance bands (Fail <25, Acceptable 25–75, Great ≥75). A participant is promoted when the mean session score exceeds 75 and demoted when the fail ratio reaches 0.50. Sixteen healthy participants (mean age 54.5 ± 6.8 years) were divided into two groups of eight: a high-performance group performing all repetitions correctly, and a low-performance group following a controlled error pattern designed to trigger demotion. Kinematic time series from the robot’s onboard RGB-D camera were compared against a stereophotogrammetric gold standard (BTS SMART-DX EVO).

Results: Scoring concordance between TIAGo- and mocap-derived classifications reached 100% (Cohen’s κ = 1.000) across all 120 repetitions, with no cross-band errors between Fail and Great. The executed arc trajectory showed near-perfect agreement with the commanded geometry (Pearson r > 0.99). Adaptive behavior was correct for all 16 participants.

Discussion: These findings verify that the onboard measurement chain reproduces gold-standard band assignments under the tested conditions and that the session-level decision pipeline operates end-to-end as specified. Validation of the scoring thresholds under naturally occurring, near-boundary performance remains necessary before clinical use.

Related

  1. French validation of the short version of the ASA questionnaire: An exploration of the socio-technical imaginaries and cosmology of Socially Interactive Agent evaluation
    Vincent P. Martin, Charlotte Menard, Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi +8
    L'EncéphalePeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  2. Unilateral cross-feeding constrains adaptive evolution, even in the producer without direct fitness effects
    Zahraa Al-Tameemi, Thibault Rosazza, Alejandra Rodríguez-Verdugo
    Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  3. An Item Response Theory-Based Validation of the Vanderbilt Classroom Listening Assessment Short Survey for Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss
    Amy Liang, Haiping Huang, Sonya K. Sterba +1
    Ear and HearingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Digital and Coaching Interventions for Uptake of Cancer Genetic Testing
    Sarah Austin, Emerson Delacroix, John D. Rice +13
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Genetics & genomicsCrossref
  5. Unilateral primary congenital glaucoma presenting with buphthalmos in a child.
    Gauri Vijay Ghate, Pramod Borghare, Shubham Prakash Mundhe
    BMJ case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{soldi2026hemibot,
  title = {{HemiBot: design and technical validation of an adaptive Robotic coaching system for Unilateral Spatial Neglect rehabilitation}},
  author = {Roberto Soldi and Bruna Maria Vittoria Guerra and Stefania Sozzi and Francesco Lunghi and Leo Russo and Micaela Schmid and Stefano Ramat},
  journal = {Frontiers in Robotics and AI},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frobt.2026.1950821},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1950821},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - HemiBot: design and technical validation of an adaptive Robotic coaching system for Unilateral Spatial Neglect rehabilitation
AU  - Roberto Soldi
AU  - Bruna Maria Vittoria Guerra
AU  - Stefania Sozzi
AU  - Francesco Lunghi
AU  - Leo Russo
AU  - Micaela Schmid
AU  - Stefano Ramat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Robotics and AI
DO  - 10.3389/frobt.2026.1950821
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1950821
AB  - Introduction: Robot-mediated neuro-motor rehabilitation offers intensive, repeatable, and objectively monitored therapy, yet existing systems rarely integrate automated session management, real-time per-repetition scoring, and data-driven adaptive difficulty progression within a single non-contact architecture. This work presents HemiBot (Hemineglect roBot), a ROS 2 software stack implementing a fully automated coaching pipeline for semicircular arm-pointing exercises on the TIAGo mobile manipulator (PAL Robotics), targeting post-stroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN), in which patients fail to orient toward or interact with stimuli in the contralesional hemispace.  Methods: The robot’s end effector moves into the neglected hemispace as an exogenous attentional cue while the participant actively reaches toward it with the affected arm. The system extends a skeletal tracking framework with a Behavior Tree orchestrating exercise execution and per-repetition metric computation, a Coach node performing session-level adaptive difficulty progression, Italian empathetic text-to-speech feedback, and a scoreboard for therapist supervision. The scoring metric combines arm-alignment angle and hand–end-effector distance in a logical AND gate, yielding a normalized 0–100 score partitioned into three performance bands (Fail <25, Acceptable 25–75, Great ≥75). A participant is promoted when the mean session score exceeds 75 and demoted when the fail ratio reaches 0.50. Sixteen healthy participants (mean age 54.5 ± 6.8 years) were divided into two groups of eight: a high-performance group performing all repetitions correctly, and a low-performance group following a controlled error pattern designed to trigger demotion. Kinematic time series from the robot’s onboard RGB-D camera were compared against a stereophotogrammetric gold standard (BTS SMART-DX EVO).  Results: Scoring concordance between TIAGo- and mocap-derived classifications reached 100% (Cohen’s κ = 1.000) across all 120 repetitions, with no cross-band errors between Fail and Great. The executed arc trajectory showed near-perfect agreement with the commanded geometry (Pearson r > 0.99). Adaptive behavior was correct for all 16 participants.  Discussion: These findings verify that the onboard measurement chain reproduces gold-standard band assignments under the tested conditions and that the session-level decision pipeline operates end-to-end as specified. Validation of the scoring thresholds under naturally occurring, near-boundary performance remains necessary before clinical use.
SN  - 2296-9144
ER  -