Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Learning angles for quantum approximate optimization

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and its variants are leading algorithms to help solve challenging combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA maps these problems to Ising Hamiltonians such that their ground state is the desired solution. Candidate solutions are then drawn from a variational quantum circuit. The performance of QAOA hinges on a set of variational angles. However, finding good angles is an instance-specific and computationally expensive non-convex classical optimization task. Here, we learn the mapping from the problem instance to high-quality QAOA angles. Our learned models replace the per-instance optimization, that we call the solver, with a single forward pass that is several orders of magnitude faster than the solver with a near identical quality. Our models further generalize to unseen topologies such as Barabási-Albert and 2D grid graphs. Experiments on quantum hardware confirm that QAOA samples with angles produced by our open-source models are indistinguishable from solver angles. Crucially, models sensitive to the topology of the problem instance increase the quality of the QAOA angles. Our work amortizes a major bottleneck in QAOA by an up-front data generation and training cost. Importantly, this cost can be amortized over time in settings where many similar problems are optimized on a regular basis, as is often the case in applications for industry.

Related

  1. Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale
    Maosheng Guo, Joel Jurado Diaz, Anurag Ramesh +16
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Binary Optimization with Complex Constraints via Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization
    Andres Ruiz, Soumyadip Ghosh, Stefan Woerner
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Depth analysis of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with a Grover mixer
    Bojko N. Bakalov, Dimitar Grantcharov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Optimal FALQON for Quantum Approximate Optimization via Layer-wise Parameter Tuning
    Michael Mancini, Shabnam Sodagari
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. The Overlap Gap Property: Separating Quantum and Quantum-Inspired Approximate Optimization Algorithms
    Mark Goh, Thorge Müller
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jakubik2026learning,
  title = {{Learning angles for quantum approximate optimization}},
  author = {Johannes Jakubik and Isabelle Wittmann and Zaheed Gaffoor and Gciniwe Simphiwe Baloyi and Craig Mahlasi and Etienne Vos and Thomas Brunschwiler and Daniel J. Egger},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23296},
  eprint = {2610.23296},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23296},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Learning angles for quantum approximate optimization
AU  - Johannes Jakubik
AU  - Isabelle Wittmann
AU  - Zaheed Gaffoor
AU  - Gciniwe Simphiwe Baloyi
AU  - Craig Mahlasi
AU  - Etienne Vos
AU  - Thomas Brunschwiler
AU  - Daniel J. Egger
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23296
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23296
AB  - The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and its variants are leading algorithms to help solve challenging combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA maps these problems to Ising Hamiltonians such that their ground state is the desired solution. Candidate solutions are then drawn from a variational quantum circuit. The performance of QAOA hinges on a set of variational angles. However, finding good angles is an instance-specific and computationally expensive non-convex classical optimization task. Here, we learn the mapping from the problem instance to high-quality QAOA angles. Our learned models replace the per-instance optimization, that we call the solver, with a single forward pass that is several orders of magnitude faster than the solver with a near identical quality. Our models further generalize to unseen topologies such as Barabási-Albert and 2D grid graphs. Experiments on quantum hardware confirm that QAOA samples with angles produced by our open-source models are indistinguishable from solver angles. Crucially, models sensitive to the topology of the problem instance increase the quality of the QAOA angles. Our work amortizes a major bottleneck in QAOA by an up-front data generation and training cost. Importantly, this cost can be amortized over time in settings where many similar problems are optimized on a regular basis, as is often the case in applications for industry.
ER  -