Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Overlap-free multi-material topology optimization for minimum compliance in two and three dimensions by level-set-based negative-mapping interpolation

Abstract

Gray elements and material overlaps at the interfaces limit density-based multi-material topology optimization. This article extends the level set-based negative-mapping interpolation to the multi-material proportional topology optimization of macro-scale structures in two and three dimensions. An alternating active-phase algorithm decomposes M-phase problems into two-phase sub-problems described by level set functions; an evolutionary strategy removes the need for sentitivity analysis; and the negative-mapping interpolation eliminates the overlaps of the phases in the interface elements. Cantilever and half-MBB beams in two dimensions and a cantilever beam in three dimensions, with three and four material phases, give smooth boundaries, no gray elements and overlap-free designs. The compliance lies below the SIMP value in four of the eight two-dimensional cases and 0.3%, 0.4%, 4.8% and 12.7% above it in the other four. The influence of the material properties, of the interface treatment and of the algorithmic parameters is also examined.

Versions

Related

  1. Mapping locally nondominated curves in multiobjective topology optimization of compliance and volume
    Tom De Weer, Elke Deckers
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Robust topology optimization with non-Gaussian material fields using polygonal finite elements
    Nilton Cuellar, Anderson Pereira, Ivan F. M. Menezes +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. The packing spectrum: interpolation between Hausdorff and packing dimensions
    Peizhi Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Assouad type dimensions of generalized affine fractal interpolation functions and their applications
    Aaryan Dharmesh Shah, Sangita Jha
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsDynamical systemsarXiv
  5. Birkhoff interpolation models for optimization with some available derivatives
    Jeffrey Larson, Matt Menickelly, Evan Toler
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026overlapfree,
  title = {{Overlap-free multi-material topology optimization for minimum compliance in two and three dimensions by level-set-based negative-mapping interpolation}},
  author = {Dong Wang and Qianglin Ran and Xuanliang Wang and Wei Xiang and Wenming Cheng and Run Du},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.17963},
  eprint = {2608.17963},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17963},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Overlap-free multi-material topology optimization for minimum compliance in two and three dimensions by level-set-based negative-mapping interpolation
AU  - Dong Wang
AU  - Qianglin Ran
AU  - Xuanliang Wang
AU  - Wei Xiang
AU  - Wenming Cheng
AU  - Run Du
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.17963
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17963
AB  - Gray elements and material overlaps at the interfaces limit density-based multi-material topology optimization. This article extends the level set-based negative-mapping interpolation to the multi-material proportional topology optimization of macro-scale structures in two and three dimensions. An alternating active-phase algorithm decomposes M-phase problems into two-phase sub-problems described by level set functions; an evolutionary strategy removes the need for sentitivity analysis; and the negative-mapping interpolation eliminates the overlaps of the phases in the interface elements. Cantilever and half-MBB beams in two dimensions and a cantilever beam in three dimensions, with three and four material phases, give smooth boundaries, no gray elements and overlap-free designs. The compliance lies below the SIMP value in four of the eight two-dimensional cases and 0.3%, 0.4%, 4.8% and 12.7% above it in the other four. The influence of the material properties, of the interface treatment and of the algorithmic parameters is also examined.
ER  -