Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Public Health

Assessment of SafeCare healthcare quality improvement program for sustainable scaling in Ghana

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, P. O. Box 78, Legon, Accra, Ghana
  2. 2PharmAccess Foundation Ghana, P.O. Box CT 10245, East Cantonment, Accra, Ghana
  3. 3PharmAccess Foundation Amsterdam, Paasheuvelweg 25, Amsterdam, 1105 BP The Netherlands
  4. 4Christian Health Association of Ghana, P. O. Box AN 7316, Labone, Accra Ghana
  5. 5Regional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 96, Legon,Accra, Ghana
  6. 6Ministry of Health, P. O. Box M 44, Sekou Toure Ave. North Ridge, Accra, Ghana

Abstract

Purpose: The Christian Health Association of Ghana (CHAG) with technical assistance from a Non-Governmental Organisation, PharmAccess is implementing a quality improvement programme in selected health facilities using the SafeCare international standards and methodology. The programme is planned to be transferred to the network of CHAG health facilities to run sustainably after an initial two years. The current study examines challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the programme and based on lessons learnt, explore factors that will promote or constrain a sustainable transitioning to CHAG network.

Method: The study used a cross-sectional qualitative design (multiple case studies) and interviewed 93 individuals from 27 health facilities, 9 assessors, 12 heads of Church Health Directorates (CHD), 3 officers from CHAG and 2 from PharmAccess. A thematic analytical approach was used in analysing and reporting the findings.

Results: Findings indicate that poor programme awareness among health facility leadership and staff as well as among CHD leadership adversely affected buy-in and commitment at the early stages of implementation, although this changed for the better later. Challenges included lack of motivated staff, inadequate finance, poor access to relevant information and the internet and lack of appropriate administrative and governance structures for implementation. Notwithstanding these challenges, SafeCare became popular and is seen as impactful by all stakeholders and therefore recommended to be continued with CHAG.

Conclusion: CHAG can take advantage of the willingness to adopt SafeCare, the positive attitude among stakeholders and the complementary findings of this study to develop a sound, inclusive and sustainable transition strategy for scaling.

Related

  1. Factors associated with the quality of urban geriatric healthcare services empowered by large language models and improvement pathways: a theoretical framework and cross-sectional study
    Xiaoyan Qi, Xuejiao Song, Jingkai Xu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Aligning Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Through Repeated Assessment and Feedback: A Multisite Quality Improvement Initiative in Viet Nam
    Open forum infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Reconsidering change management as a core competency in healthcare quality improvement
    Venkadesan Rajendran
    Discover Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  4. Developing and evaluating a customized evidence-based safety training program for healthcare staff: a quality improvement approach
    Elizabeth Lin, Hugh Boyd, Emmanuel Bratsalis +5
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Training and Assessment of Non-Technical Human Factor Skills Among Anesthesiology Residents: An Exploratory Educational Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Sukruta Pradhan, William Krogman, Dakota Rapp +4
    Kansas journal of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{abekahnkrumah2026assessment,
  title = {{Assessment of SafeCare healthcare quality improvement program for sustainable scaling in Ghana}},
  author = {Gordon Abekah-Nkrumah and Maxwell Antwi and Bonifacia Benefo Agyei and Tobias F. Rinke de Wit and Aafke E. de Graaff and James Duah and Grace Adjei Okai and Doris Ottie-Boakye and Odile Anukware Nkrumah and Gifty Sunkwa-Mills},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28933-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28933-6},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Assessment of SafeCare healthcare quality improvement program for sustainable scaling in Ghana
AU  - Gordon Abekah-Nkrumah
AU  - Maxwell Antwi
AU  - Bonifacia Benefo Agyei
AU  - Tobias F. Rinke de Wit
AU  - Aafke E. de Graaff
AU  - James Duah
AU  - Grace Adjei Okai
AU  - Doris Ottie-Boakye
AU  - Odile Anukware Nkrumah
AU  - Gifty Sunkwa-Mills
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/10
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-28933-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28933-6
AB  - Purpose: The Christian Health Association of Ghana (CHAG) with technical assistance from a Non-Governmental Organisation, PharmAccess is implementing a quality improvement programme in selected health facilities using the SafeCare international standards and methodology. The programme is planned to be transferred to the network of CHAG health facilities to run sustainably after an initial two years. The current study examines challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the programme and based on lessons learnt, explore factors that will promote or constrain a sustainable transitioning to CHAG network.  Method: The study used a cross-sectional qualitative design (multiple case studies) and interviewed 93 individuals from 27 health facilities, 9 assessors, 12 heads of Church Health Directorates (CHD), 3 officers from CHAG and 2 from PharmAccess. A thematic analytical approach was used in analysing and reporting the findings.  Results: Findings indicate that poor programme awareness among health facility leadership and staff as well as among CHD leadership adversely affected buy-in and commitment at the early stages of implementation, although this changed for the better later. Challenges included lack of motivated staff, inadequate finance, poor access to relevant information and the internet and lack of appropriate administrative and governance structures for implementation. Notwithstanding these challenges, SafeCare became popular and is seen as impactful by all stakeholders and therefore recommended to be continued with CHAG.  Conclusion: CHAG can take advantage of the willingness to adopt SafeCare, the positive attitude among stakeholders and the complementary findings of this study to develop a sound, inclusive and sustainable transition strategy for scaling.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -