Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Integral Probability Boundaries

Abstract

Bounds based on Integral Probability Metrics (IPMs) are ubiquitous in machine learning and statistics, appearing, e.g., in generalization, alignment, fairness, and privacy. IPMs reduce the discrepancy between two distributions to a single worst-case gap between expectations. This compression is costly: for rare events, safety failures, or under-represented groups, IPM-based bounds are loose or vacuous. We introduce a non-linear generalization of IPMs, which we term Integral Probability Boundaries (IPBs). Unlike IPMs, IPBs provide bounds that are tight at the extremes. We derive their basic properties and present algorithms for estimating them in practically relevant settings. We demonstrate the usage of IPBs in both theoretical and practical applications for alignment, judge-free performance estimation, and fairness, where they enable us to obtain sharp bounds on performance and fairness gaps, e.g., 15 p.p. more precise estimates on fairness gaps for rare groups in a realistic generative modeling task, compared to the state of the art.

Related

  1. Robust estimation in generalized linear models based on the normal quantiles of the probability integral transformation
    Marina Valdora, Víctor Yohai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Tail-Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Test for the Generalized Extreme Value Distribution Based on the Probability Integral Transform
    Preut Thanarat, Nipada Papukdee
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0StatisticsCrossref
  3. Geometric Boundaries of the Frohmanian Symplectic Tether: Formal Tracking of the 2D Clock Test and Open Analytic Inputs for Fefferman Statement (B)
    Benjamin Frohman
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Peer-reviewedLicence not stated8 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
  4. Construction of log Calabi--Yau boundaries from int-amplified endomorphisms
    Shou Yoshikawa
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Full termination of MMP for klt pairs with big boundaries
    Kenta Hashizume
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kulynych2026integral,
  title = {{Integral Probability Boundaries}},
  author = {Bogdan Kulynych and Shahab Asoodeh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.38036},
  eprint = {2610.38036},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38036},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Integral Probability Boundaries
AU  - Bogdan Kulynych
AU  - Shahab Asoodeh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.38036
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38036
AB  - Bounds based on Integral Probability Metrics (IPMs) are ubiquitous in machine learning and statistics, appearing, e.g., in generalization, alignment, fairness, and privacy. IPMs reduce the discrepancy between two distributions to a single worst-case gap between expectations. This compression is costly: for rare events, safety failures, or under-represented groups, IPM-based bounds are loose or vacuous. We introduce a non-linear generalization of IPMs, which we term Integral Probability Boundaries (IPBs). Unlike IPMs, IPBs provide bounds that are tight at the extremes. We derive their basic properties and present algorithms for estimating them in practically relevant settings. We demonstrate the usage of IPBs in both theoretical and practical applications for alignment, judge-free performance estimation, and fairness, where they enable us to obtain sharp bounds on performance and fairness gaps, e.g., 15 p.p. more precise estimates on fairness gaps for rare groups in a realistic generative modeling task, compared to the state of the art.
ER  -