Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
224,311 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Comparing teacher-made and AI-assisted teaching videos for thyroid eye disease: an exploratory study

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Changzheng Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
  2. 2Department of General Practice, Changzheng Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Background: Thyroid eye disease (TED), together with its acute and vision-threatening complication, dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), requires timely diagnosis and intervention. The limited availability of specialists in orbital diseases poses a significant challenge to ophthalmology residency training. In this context, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities for medical education, though its effectiveness in ophthalmology training remains to be explored.

Objective: This exploratory study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in ophthalmology education, focusing on TED domains.

Methods: The 46 residents (28 general residents and 18 ophthalmology residents) were randomly assigned to either an AI-assisted or a teacher-made 5-min teaching video on TED. All participants then completed three tests through online questionnaire experiments, each consisting of 20-item clinical questions about TED. Test 1 served as a baseline assessment of disease knowledge, Test 2 was conducted 5 min after learning to evaluate short-term learning outcomes, along with a questionnaire survey about AI tools, and Test 3 was administered 1 week later to assess long-term learning outcome.

Results: Viewing the AI-assisted video significantly improved test scores from baseline to 5 min (mean difference = 13.04; p = 0.004), but the improvement was not sustained at 1 week (mean difference = 7.61; p = 0.16). Completion time also decreased significantly from baseline to both 5 min (p = 0.009; GMR = 0.57) and 1 week (p < 0.001; GMR = 0.45). No significant differences were observed between the AI-assisted and teacher-made video groups across all assessments (all p > 0.05). Additionally, learning experience was positively correlated with learning outcome (r = 0.60; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings suggested that the AI-assisted and teacher-made videos for TED education showed no statistically significant difference. However, substantial expert oversight was required, and the AI-assisted workflow did not reduce total production time in this study. Given the limited long-term retention, such AI-assisted videos may be better positioned as supplementary resources combined with human expertise.

Related

  1. Intraoperative Teaching in Robotic-Assisted Surgery—A Systematic Review
    Anna K. Kieslich, Ruari Jardine, Hussain Ibrahim +5
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Thyroid-Stimulating hormone and metabolic cardiovascular risk markers from weighted two-wave analyses of india with an exploratory Chinese inpatient comparison
    Xudong Sun, Xiaoshan Yue, Peixin Gu +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. A pragmatic evaluation of outcome fragility in randomized clinical trials comparing open microdiscectomy and endoscopic-assisted discectomy: A meta-analysis
    Michael D. Brown, Alqasim Elnaggar, Obed Barkus +5
    North American Spine Society journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Digital transformation in higher scientific education: The roles of virtual simulation, AI-assisted learning, and blended teaching
    RuiQuan Long, XueHui Zhang, Zhao li
    Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  5. Comparing the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan administered in different dose-schedule patterns for the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory, observational post hoc analysis from the prospective SALLY registry cohort.
    Nuoya Yu, Ziyan Tong, Yaohua Fan +4
    Journal of gastrointestinal oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{liu2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing teacher-made and AI-assisted teaching videos for thyroid eye disease: an exploratory study}},
  author = {Shu Liu and Yue Wang and Yuqing Chen and Yunyun Chang and Ying Wang and Yu Gao and Ruili Wei},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcell.2026.1963967},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1963967},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing teacher-made and AI-assisted teaching videos for thyroid eye disease: an exploratory study
AU  - Shu Liu
AU  - Yue Wang
AU  - Yuqing Chen
AU  - Yunyun Chang
AU  - Ying Wang
AU  - Yu Gao
AU  - Ruili Wei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
DO  - 10.3389/fcell.2026.1963967
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1963967
AB  - Background: Thyroid eye disease (TED), together with its acute and vision-threatening complication, dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON), requires timely diagnosis and intervention. The limited availability of specialists in orbital diseases poses a significant challenge to ophthalmology residency training. In this context, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities for medical education, though its effectiveness in ophthalmology training remains to be explored.  Objective: This exploratory study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in ophthalmology education, focusing on TED domains.  Methods: The 46 residents (28 general residents and 18 ophthalmology residents) were randomly assigned to either an AI-assisted or a teacher-made 5-min teaching video on TED. All participants then completed three tests through online questionnaire experiments, each consisting of 20-item clinical questions about TED. Test 1 served as a baseline assessment of disease knowledge, Test 2 was conducted 5 min after learning to evaluate short-term learning outcomes, along with a questionnaire survey about AI tools, and Test 3 was administered 1 week later to assess long-term learning outcome.  Results: Viewing the AI-assisted video significantly improved test scores from baseline to 5 min (mean difference = 13.04; p = 0.004), but the improvement was not sustained at 1 week (mean difference = 7.61; p = 0.16). Completion time also decreased significantly from baseline to both 5 min (p = 0.009; GMR = 0.57) and 1 week (p < 0.001; GMR = 0.45). No significant differences were observed between the AI-assisted and teacher-made video groups across all assessments (all p > 0.05). Additionally, learning experience was positively correlated with learning outcome (r = 0.60; P < 0.001).  Conclusion: Our findings suggested that the AI-assisted and teacher-made videos for TED education showed no statistically significant difference. However, substantial expert oversight was required, and the AI-assisted workflow did not reduce total production time in this study. Given the limited long-term retention, such AI-assisted videos may be better positioned as supplementary resources combined with human expertise.
SN  - 2296-634X
ER  -