PreprintCC BY 4.0OSF Preprints
Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis through the limit of an approximated ξ function
Abstract
Considering an approximated Riemann ξ(s) function defined with a parametric function s(Q) , and considering an appropriate fractional function ξ(s)/ξ (1-s), it is shown that the rate to reach the exact value ξ(s) = 0, and the exact form, causes a contradiction when the real part σ of the complex variable s is different from 1/2.
Related
- A Formal Proof of Riemann Hypothesis from Existence Alone, the Sign Excepted by Theorem: The Constructed Witness, the Identity Cone over the Fixed Locus, the Grounded Counter-Model, and the Cure Theorem Proved in Lean 4 and Re-executed in Fortran
- Currently, there are no reasons to doubt the Riemann Hypothesis: The zeta function beyond the realm of computation
- The Riemann Hypothesis: Proof via Herglotz Analyticity and Explicit Construction of the Hilbert-Pólya Operator
- On the Riemann Hypothesis: A Complete Proof via the Twin Operator Method
- Angular Monotonicity of Completed Dirichlet L-Functions via the Three-Term Zeta Decomposition: A Proof of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for Non-Principal Characters
BibTeX
@misc{cadeddu2026proof,
title = {{Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis through the limit of an approximated ξ function}},
author = {Enrico Pier Giorgio Cadeddu},
howpublished = {OSF Preprints},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31219/osf.io/bvmxc_v5},
url = {https://osf.io/bvmxc_v5/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis through the limit of an approximated ξ function
AU - Enrico Pier Giorgio Cadeddu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/28
PB - OSF Preprints
DO - 10.31219/osf.io/bvmxc_v5
UR - https://osf.io/bvmxc_v5/
AB - Considering an approximated Riemann ξ(s) function defined with a parametric function s(Q) , and considering an appropriate fractional function ξ(s)/ξ (1-s), it is shown that the rate to reach the exact value ξ(s) = 0, and the exact form, causes a contradiction when the real part σ of the complex variable s is different from 1/2.
ER -