Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Indoor Tanning in Europe: Temporal Trends, Sociodemographic Determinants from the Euromelanoma Campaign (2009–2018)

40 more authors
40 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
  2. 2Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
  3. 3Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
  4. 4Department of Dermatology, Institut Jules Bordet (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
  5. 5Biomedical Statistics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
  6. 6Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, 119071 Moscow, Russia
  7. 7First Department of Dermatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, An-dreas Sygros Hospital, 16121 Athens, Greece
  8. 8Second Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medi-cal School, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
  9. 9Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
  10. 10Department of Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
  11. 11Skin Cancer Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
  12. 12Institute of Dermatology and Cosmetology, 01024 Kyiv, Ukraine
  13. 13Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland
  14. 14Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
  15. 15Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
  16. 16Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
  17. 17Department of Dermatology, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Clinical Immunology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-229 Olsztyn, Poland
  18. 18Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Onco-Hematology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Re-search Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
  19. 19Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia
  20. 20Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
  21. 21Dermatology Prof. Hercogova, Chlumcanskeho 5, 180 00 Praha, Czech Republic
  22. 22Department of Dermatology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
  23. 23Private Practice, 3300 Tienen, Belgium
  24. 24Epidermis Dermatology Center, CUF Institute, 4460-188 Porto, Portugal
  25. 25Portuguese Skin Cancer Association, 4430-196 Porto, Portugal
  26. 26Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
  27. 27Dermatology Department, Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  28. 28Dermatological Practice Tibarg, 22459 Hamburg, Germany
  29. 29Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
  30. 30Egoclinic, District 1, 010235 Bucharest, Romania
  31. 31Oncologic Dermatology Department, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
  32. 32Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital ‘Sestre milosrdnice’, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
  33. 33Clinic of Infectious, Chest Diseases, Dermatovenereology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius Uni-versity, LT-08411 Vilnius, Lithuania
  34. 34Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy, 0144 Tbilisi, Georgia
  35. 35Georgia Faculty of Medicine, Caucasus International University, 0192 Tbilisi, Georgia
  36. 36Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
  37. 37Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
  38. 38Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
  39. 39Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey
  40. 40Derma Clinic Riga, Latvian University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia

Abstract

Background: In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified UV-emitting tanning devices as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). This study aimed to describe ten-year trends in sunbed use prevalence across Europe and examine differences by country and sociodemographic and phenotypic characteristics. Methods: Euromelanoma survey data collected between 2009 and 2018 from 33 countries were analysed among individuals voluntarily attending free skin examinations. Annual sunbed use prevalence and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by country, with stratified analyses by gender, age, education level, and skin phototype. Associations with sunbed use were investigated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results: A total of 343,675 participants were included. Among Euromelanoma campaign participants, current sunbed use declined over the study period, declining from approximately 12.8% in 2009 to below 6% by 2018, despite year-to-year fluctuations. Women, adults aged 20–35 years and individuals with skin phototypes III–IV exhibited the highest odds of sunbed use (OR Female vs. Male = 3.01, 95%CI [2.91–3.12], OR 20–35 vs. >35 = 2.54, 95%CI [2.47–2.61], and OR Type III–IV vs. Type I–II = 1.52, 95%CI [1.47–1.56], respectively). Marked heterogeneity was observed across countries. Mixed-effects analyses showed a strong temporal decline that was significantly steeper among younger participants, particularly those aged 20–35 years, than among individuals older than 35 years. Conclusions: Indoor tanning prevalence declined across Europe between 2009 and 2018, during a period of evolving post-IARC regulatory and preventive measures. Persistent sociodemographic disparities and substantial between-country heterogeneity highlight the need for targeted, country-specific prevention strategies and continued monitoring of indoor tanning behaviors.

Related

  1. Intentions to abstain from alcohol during the Buddhist Lent campaign in Thailand: AUDIT-C risk profiles and independent sociodemographic correlates
    Udomsak Saengow, Tagese Yakob, Abebe Sorsa Badacho
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Functional independence and sociodemographic determinants of activities of daily living among patients with thalassemia in Southern Iraq: a cross-sectional analytical study
    Alaa Muhaibes Tuama, Ali Faris Abdul Hussein, Laith salah hashim +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHuman geneticsCrossref
  3. Knowledge of gestational diabetes mellitus and its sociodemographic determinants among pregnant women in Bangladesh: a nationwide facility-based cross-sectional study.
    Bishwajit Bhowmik, Hafiza Nasrin, Tasnima Siddiquee +10
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Determinants of Body Dissatisfaction in a Sample of Spanish Adolescents: The EHDLA Study.
    Diana Ramos-Camino, Camila Miño, José Adrián Montenegro-Espinosa +7
    European journal of investigation in health, psychology and educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  5. Prevalence, patterns, perceptions, and sociodemographic determinants of dietary supplement use among adults in the United Arab Emirates
    Ali Alkhayat, Nelofar Sami Khan
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{gaeta2026indoor,
  title = {{Indoor Tanning in Europe: Temporal Trends, Sociodemographic Determinants from the Euromelanoma Campaign (2009–2018)}},
  author = {Aurora Gaeta and Mariano Suppa and Hassane Njimi and Nikolay Nikolaevich Potekaev and Alexander J. Stratigos and Alexander Katoulis and Åsa Ingvar and Ada Girnita and Olga Bogomolets and Jean-Luc Bulliard and Olivier Gaide and Juerg Hafner and Judith Oláh and Eszter Baltas and Vladimir Placek and Grażyna Kaminska-Winciorek and Lidija Kandolf and Liliana Medenica and Jana Hercogová and Eduardo Nagore and Thomas Maselis and Osvaldo Correia and Ana Filipa Duarte and Hana Helppikangas and Michael Reusch and Alin Codrut Nicolescu and Ana-Maria Forsea and Mirna Šitum and Matilda Bylaite-Bucinskiene and Lally Mekokishvili and Maia Datuashvili and Ingrid Roscher and Henrik Frank Lorentzen and Ketty Peris and Nahide Onsun and Raimonds Karls and Pille Konno and Zorica Zafirovik and Tanja Planinšek Ručigaj and Ana Benedicic and Michelle Murphy and Angela Hayrapetyan and Michael Hambardzumyan and Lawrence Scerri and Daniel Micallef and Aliaksandr M. Lukyanau and Andreas Pallouras and Konstantinou Paschalis and Boris Nedelciuc and Wiam Al Bouzidi and Sara Gandini and Véronique del Marmol},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18213548},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3548},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Indoor Tanning in Europe: Temporal Trends, Sociodemographic Determinants from the Euromelanoma Campaign (2009–2018)
AU  - Aurora Gaeta
AU  - Mariano Suppa
AU  - Hassane Njimi
AU  - Nikolay Nikolaevich Potekaev
AU  - Alexander J. Stratigos
AU  - Alexander Katoulis
AU  - Åsa Ingvar
AU  - Ada Girnita
AU  - Olga Bogomolets
AU  - Jean-Luc Bulliard
AU  - Olivier Gaide
AU  - Juerg Hafner
AU  - Judith Oláh
AU  - Eszter Baltas
AU  - Vladimir Placek
AU  - Grażyna Kaminska-Winciorek
AU  - Lidija Kandolf
AU  - Liliana Medenica
AU  - Jana Hercogová
AU  - Eduardo Nagore
AU  - Thomas Maselis
AU  - Osvaldo Correia
AU  - Ana Filipa Duarte
AU  - Hana Helppikangas
AU  - Michael Reusch
AU  - Alin Codrut Nicolescu
AU  - Ana-Maria Forsea
AU  - Mirna Šitum
AU  - Matilda Bylaite-Bucinskiene
AU  - Lally Mekokishvili
AU  - Maia Datuashvili
AU  - Ingrid Roscher
AU  - Henrik Frank Lorentzen
AU  - Ketty Peris
AU  - Nahide Onsun
AU  - Raimonds Karls
AU  - Pille Konno
AU  - Zorica Zafirovik
AU  - Tanja Planinšek Ručigaj
AU  - Ana Benedicic
AU  - Michelle Murphy
AU  - Angela Hayrapetyan
AU  - Michael Hambardzumyan
AU  - Lawrence Scerri
AU  - Daniel Micallef
AU  - Aliaksandr M. Lukyanau
AU  - Andreas Pallouras
AU  - Konstantinou Paschalis
AU  - Boris Nedelciuc
AU  - Wiam Al Bouzidi
AU  - Sara Gandini
AU  - Véronique del Marmol
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18213548
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3548
AB  - Background: In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified UV-emitting tanning devices as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). This study aimed to describe ten-year trends in sunbed use prevalence across Europe and examine differences by country and sociodemographic and phenotypic characteristics. Methods: Euromelanoma survey data collected between 2009 and 2018 from 33 countries were analysed among individuals voluntarily attending free skin examinations. Annual sunbed use prevalence and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by country, with stratified analyses by gender, age, education level, and skin phototype. Associations with sunbed use were investigated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results: A total of 343,675 participants were included. Among Euromelanoma campaign participants, current sunbed use declined over the study period, declining from approximately 12.8% in 2009 to below 6% by 2018, despite year-to-year fluctuations. Women, adults aged 20–35 years and individuals with skin phototypes III–IV exhibited the highest odds of sunbed use (OR Female vs. Male = 3.01, 95%CI [2.91–3.12], OR 20–35 vs. >35 = 2.54, 95%CI [2.47–2.61], and OR Type III–IV vs. Type I–II = 1.52, 95%CI [1.47–1.56], respectively). Marked heterogeneity was observed across countries. Mixed-effects analyses showed a strong temporal decline that was significantly steeper among younger participants, particularly those aged 20–35 years, than among individuals older than 35 years. Conclusions: Indoor tanning prevalence declined across Europe between 2009 and 2018, during a period of evolving post-IARC regulatory and preventive measures. Persistent sociodemographic disparities and substantial between-country heterogeneity highlight the need for targeted, country-specific prevention strategies and continued monitoring of indoor tanning behaviors.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -