Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of the anus, rectum and colon

Clinical Impact of Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Kyoto Saiseikai Hospital, 101 Shimouchida, Shimo-kaiinji, Nagaoka-kyo City, Kyoto 617-8617, Japan.
  2. 2Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 624-0906, Japan.

Abstract

Although the prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI) has attracted increasing attention as a prognostic marker for various cancers, its clinical significance in older patients has not been fully clarified. This retrospective single-center study aimed to investigate the association among PINI, long-term prognosis, and postoperative complications in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We analyzed 181 patients aged ≥75 years with pathological stage I-III CRC who underwent curative surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.001) rates in patients with low PINI were significantly worse than those in their counterparts. Low PINI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.45-11.1, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.03-8.36, p = 0.042). Moreover, low PINI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.10-7.82, p = 0.030). Additionally, patients with low PINI had a significantly higher recurrence rate for locoregional metastasis than those with high PINI (2.79% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001); no significant differences were observed in the recurrence rates for other patterns. Low PINI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and poor prognosis in older patients with CRC. Preoperative inflammatory and immunonutritional assessments using the PINI may contribute to comprehensive risk stratification and individualized perioperative management in this vulnerable population.

Related

  1. Prognostic Impact of a Simple GDMT Score on Clinical Outcomes and Cardiac Reverse Remodelling in Patients with ADHF: Insights from the JROADHF-Next Registry
    Ryuichi Matsukawa, Yasushi Mukai, Yudai Fujimoto +13
    CJC openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after first- and second-line immunotherapy in a cohort of 57 patients with refractory autoimmune encephalitis
    Jiao He, Haozhe Lu
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Nutritional Status at Admission and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Results from the MODIeCOSe in Italy Study
    Carola Buscemi, Matteo Monami, Cristiana Randazzo +20
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Computed tomography-based measurements of fat quality are associated with the prognostic nutritional index in gastric cancer patients
    Ryohei Nishiguchi, Shinichi Asaka, Masano Sagawa +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  5. Evaluation of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma treated with first-line chemotherapy: A multi-institutional retrospective study
    Koshiro Fukuda, Hiroki Osumi, Atsuo Takashima +15
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{matsubara2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical Impact of Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer.}},
  author = {Daiki Matsubara and Miki Tanaka and Atsuhito Ando and Atsushi Matsumura and Satoshi Mochizuki and Koji Miyagawa and Nobuaki Fuji and Atsushi Shiozaki},
  journal = {Journal of the anus, rectum and colon},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.23922/jarc.2026-043},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42952878},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical Impact of Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index on Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
AU  - Daiki Matsubara
AU  - Miki Tanaka
AU  - Atsuhito Ando
AU  - Atsushi Matsumura
AU  - Satoshi Mochizuki
AU  - Koji Miyagawa
AU  - Nobuaki Fuji
AU  - Atsushi Shiozaki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Journal of the anus, rectum and colon
DO  - 10.23922/jarc.2026-043
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42952878
AB  - Although the prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI) has attracted increasing attention as a prognostic marker for various cancers, its clinical significance in older patients has not been fully clarified. This retrospective single-center study aimed to investigate the association among PINI, long-term prognosis, and postoperative complications in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We analyzed 181 patients aged ≥75 years with pathological stage I-III CRC who underwent curative surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2023. Overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.001) rates in patients with low PINI were significantly worse than those in their counterparts. Low PINI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.45-11.1, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.03-8.36, p = 0.042). Moreover, low PINI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.10-7.82, p = 0.030). Additionally, patients with low PINI had a significantly higher recurrence rate for locoregional metastasis than those with high PINI (2.79% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001); no significant differences were observed in the recurrence rates for other patterns. Low PINI was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and poor prognosis in older patients with CRC. Preoperative inflammatory and immunonutritional assessments using the PINI may contribute to comprehensive risk stratification and individualized perioperative management in this vulnerable population.
SN  - 2432-3853
ER  -