Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Development and internal validation of a routine metabolic screening model for current hyperuricemia among gas station workers in Guangxi, China: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: Serum uric acid (SUA) measurement is the direct basis for identifying current hyperuricemia (HUA). We developed a non-SUA screening model for situations in which routine occupational health information is already available but a contemporaneous SUA result is temporarily unavailable, delayed, or requires separate testing.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 894 workers from 11 gas stations and related operational sites in Nanning, Guangxi, China. Current HUA was defined as same-examination SUA > 420 µmol/L in both sexes. Twelve prespecified non-SUA candidate variables were considered; total cholesterol was excluded because of high redundancy and multicollinearity with LDL-C, leaving 11 candidates for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) screening. Internal validation used 100 repetitions of site-grouped five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using out-of-fold (OOF) predictions, discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, candidate screening thresholds, and bootstrap optimism correction.

Results: Among 894 participants, 169 (18.9%) had current HUA. Sex, waist circumference, triglycerides (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and fasting blood glucose (FBG) met the prespecified selection-stability threshold and comprised the final model. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across repeated site-grouped cross-validation was 0.858 (SD 0.004), and the pooled OOF AUC was 0.866 (95% CI, 0.838–0.893). The pooled OOF Brier score was 0.108, the calibration intercept was − 0.064 (95% CI, -0.322 to 0.192), and the calibration slope was 0.920 (95% CI, 0.791–1.077). At a 10% candidate probability threshold, sensitivity was 92.9%, specificity was 64.6%, and the negative predictive value was 97.5%.

Conclusions: The five-variable model estimates the probability of current HUA and may support prioritization of confirmatory SUA testing when a contemporaneous SUA result is unavailable. It does not replace direct SUA measurement or predict future incident HUA. Independent external validation is required before broader implementation.

Related

  1. Additive interaction between ultrasound-diagnosed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and hyperuricemia on impaired fasting glucose: a large-scale cross-sectional study
    Wenwen Liang, Pengchang Wang
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  2. Construction and validation of a frailty screening model for older adults with cataract: a cross-sectional study
    Xingdong Cheng, Heting Liang, Qingyun Mao +4
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Development and validation of a novel metabolic-inflammatory health-related nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus combined with cardiovascular disease
    Juntao Tan, Tailin Dong, Yuxin He +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Development and validation of a metabolic syndrome-based nomogram to predict 1-year metastasis after radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Yanyu Chen, Hao Cheng, Changjun Xie +10
    Annals of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and psychometric validation of a health literacy competency scale for nurses, and its application in a cross-sectional survey: a methodological study
    Xuemei Bao, Shuhan Liu, Xiaoxiao Hu +4
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026development,
  title = {{Development and internal validation of a routine metabolic screening model for current hyperuricemia among gas station workers in Guangxi, China: a cross-sectional study}},
  author = {Jinbo Wang and Xinna He and Yinxia Lin and Zhuoheng Chen and Jianing Cong and Yaqin Pang and Guangzi Qi},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29953-y},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-29953-y},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and internal validation of a routine metabolic screening model for current hyperuricemia among gas station workers in Guangxi, China: a cross-sectional study
AU  - Jinbo Wang
AU  - Xinna He
AU  - Yinxia Lin
AU  - Zhuoheng Chen
AU  - Jianing Cong
AU  - Yaqin Pang
AU  - Guangzi Qi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29953-y
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-026-29953-y
AB  - Background: Serum uric acid (SUA) measurement is the direct basis for identifying current hyperuricemia (HUA). We developed a non-SUA screening model for situations in which routine occupational health information is already available but a contemporaneous SUA result is temporarily unavailable, delayed, or requires separate testing.  Methods: This cross-sectional study included 894 workers from 11 gas stations and related operational sites in Nanning, Guangxi, China. Current HUA was defined as same-examination SUA > 420 µmol/L in both sexes. Twelve prespecified non-SUA candidate variables were considered; total cholesterol was excluded because of high redundancy and multicollinearity with LDL-C, leaving 11 candidates for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) screening. Internal validation used 100 repetitions of site-grouped five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using out-of-fold (OOF) predictions, discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, candidate screening thresholds, and bootstrap optimism correction.  Results: Among 894 participants, 169 (18.9%) had current HUA. Sex, waist circumference, triglycerides (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and fasting blood glucose (FBG) met the prespecified selection-stability threshold and comprised the final model. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across repeated site-grouped cross-validation was 0.858 (SD 0.004), and the pooled OOF AUC was 0.866 (95% CI, 0.838–0.893). The pooled OOF Brier score was 0.108, the calibration intercept was − 0.064 (95% CI, -0.322 to 0.192), and the calibration slope was 0.920 (95% CI, 0.791–1.077). At a 10% candidate probability threshold, sensitivity was 92.9%, specificity was 64.6%, and the negative predictive value was 97.5%.  Conclusions: The five-variable model estimates the probability of current HUA and may support prioritization of confirmatory SUA testing when a contemporaneous SUA result is unavailable. It does not replace direct SUA measurement or predict future incident HUA. Independent external validation is required before broader implementation.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -