Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC geriatrics

Measurement properties of the Korean Short Form of the awareness of age-related change scale among korean older adults: a Rasch analysis.

  1. 1Department of Social Welfare, Halla University, 28 Halla university-gil, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, South Korea. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

The Awareness of Age-Related Change Scale (AARC) assesses perceived gains and losses associated with aging. Although a Korean short form has been validated among older adults, the reduction in item number may limit measurement coverage and weaken the interpretability of subscale scores if individual items and response categories do not function as intended. To address this issue, this study used Rasch analysis to evaluate the measurement properties of the Korean 14-item form.Methods

A face-to-face survey was conducted with Korean adults aged 65 years or older. Data from 395 participants were analyzed. Rasch analyses were performed using the Rating Scale Model. Rasch residual-based dimensionality analysis was used to evaluate whether the prespecified total scale and subscales functioned sufficiently as measurement units. Item difficulty and fit, person-item targeting, rating scale category functioning, and gender-related differential item functioning were also examined.Results

The total 14-item scale did not support a single unidimensional structure, whereas the gain awareness (GA), health-related loss awareness (HRL), and non-health-related loss awareness (NHRL) subscales showed more acceptable dimensionality. Most items fit the Rasch model, although one gain item related to paying more attention to health and one loss item related to forgetfulness showed underfit. Person-item targeting and precision indices showed low person reliability for GA (0.38) and NHRL (0.49) and modest person reliability for HRL (0.67), suggesting limited precision for individual-level assessment rather than a general weakness of the scale. The five-point response format showed disordered thresholds, suggesting limited distinction among adjacent intermediate categories. Gender-related differential item functioning was statistically significant for one item, but its effect size was negligible.Conclusion

The Korean short-form AARC is better interpreted as a subscale-based measure than as a single total score. Further validation and refinement are needed, particularly regarding selected item wording, item coverage, response category functioning, and subgroup comparability, before the scale is used for precise individual-level assessment.

Related

  1. Cross-cultural adaptation and comparative psychometric evaluation of four patient-reported outcome measures for breast cancer-related lymphedema: measurement properties and clinical discrimination
    Yue Zhou, Yun Li, Qi Zhang +11
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Awareness of Climate Change and Its Impact on Reproductive Health
    Kalyani Rath, Pritha Chakraborty, Biswakalpita Swain +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. A Bayesian Psychometric Item-Level Resource for Korean Early Vocabulary and Developmental Measurement
    Jun Ho Chai, Eon-Suk Ko
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Turkish Adaptation of the Climate Change Perceptual Awareness Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
    Çiçek Ediz, Derya Yanık, Güzel Nur Yıldız +2
    Psikiyatride Güncel YaklaşımlarPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
  5. Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with age-related macular degeneration risk in a nationwide Korean cohort
    Hong Ki Min, Bora Lee, Hyeongsu Kim +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lee2026measurement,
  title = {{Measurement properties of the Korean Short Form of the awareness of age-related change scale among korean older adults: a Rasch analysis.}},
  author = {Kyeongwon Lee},
  journal = {BMC geriatrics},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12877-026-08084-4},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972252},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Measurement properties of the Korean Short Form of the awareness of age-related change scale among korean older adults: a Rasch analysis.
AU  - Kyeongwon Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/05
JO  - BMC geriatrics
DO  - 10.1186/s12877-026-08084-4
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972252
AB  - Background  The Awareness of Age-Related Change Scale (AARC) assesses perceived gains and losses associated with aging. Although a Korean short form has been validated among older adults, the reduction in item number may limit measurement coverage and weaken the interpretability of subscale scores if individual items and response categories do not function as intended. To address this issue, this study used Rasch analysis to evaluate the measurement properties of the Korean 14-item form.Methods  A face-to-face survey was conducted with Korean adults aged 65 years or older. Data from 395 participants were analyzed. Rasch analyses were performed using the Rating Scale Model. Rasch residual-based dimensionality analysis was used to evaluate whether the prespecified total scale and subscales functioned sufficiently as measurement units. Item difficulty and fit, person-item targeting, rating scale category functioning, and gender-related differential item functioning were also examined.Results  The total 14-item scale did not support a single unidimensional structure, whereas the gain awareness (GA), health-related loss awareness (HRL), and non-health-related loss awareness (NHRL) subscales showed more acceptable dimensionality. Most items fit the Rasch model, although one gain item related to paying more attention to health and one loss item related to forgetfulness showed underfit. Person-item targeting and precision indices showed low person reliability for GA (0.38) and NHRL (0.49) and modest person reliability for HRL (0.67), suggesting limited precision for individual-level assessment rather than a general weakness of the scale. The five-point response format showed disordered thresholds, suggesting limited distinction among adjacent intermediate categories. Gender-related differential item functioning was statistically significant for one item, but its effect size was negligible.Conclusion  The Korean short-form AARC is better interpreted as a subscale-based measure than as a single total score. Further validation and refinement are needed, particularly regarding selected item wording, item coverage, response category functioning, and subgroup comparability, before the scale is used for precise individual-level assessment.
SN  - 1471-2318
ER  -