Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated From Patients With Cancer.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Chilpancingo de los Bravo, MEX.
  2. 2Clinical Oncology, State Cancerology Institute "Dr. Arturo Beltrán Ortega", Acapulco de Juarez, MEX.
  3. 3Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Acapulco de Juarez, MEX.
  4. 4Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Chilpancingo de los Bravo, MEX.

Abstract

Background

Cancer patients are at high risk of developing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms. Monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is essential for guiding treatment in this vulnerable population. This study aimed to evaluate AMR patterns and temporal evolution among clinical bacterial isolates-comparing pre-pandemic (2016-2019) versus pandemic (2020-2021) periods and care settings (outpatient vs. inpatient)-recovered from cancer patients at a tertiary care center in Guerrero, Mexico.Materials and methods

An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted between 2016 and 2021. A total of 1,019 strains were analyzed using WHONET 2023 software, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 cut-off values. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test (χ²). For antibiotics with absolute frequencies less than 5, Fisher's exact test was applied using STATA statistical software version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).Results

Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 73.1% of the isolates, with Escherichia coli (42.3%, n = 431) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.0%, n = 143) being the predominant strains. The overall prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) was 22.6%. In E. coli, an increase in resistance was observed starting in 2019, with resistance rates > 80.0% for ampicillin and cefixime. When comparing the 2020 period with 2021, resistance in E. coli increased significantly for ciprofloxacin (χ² = 4.144, p = 0.042) and ceftriaxone (χ² = 4.100, p = 0.043). Regarding MDR, 51.0% of E. coli isolates were MDR, while 32.2% of K. pneumoniae strains exhibited extensive drug resistance (XDR). In addition, possible pandrug-resistant (PDR) phenotypes were identified in 14.3% of Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Isolates from hospitalized patients showed higher resistance rates compared to those from outpatients with regard to E. coli for ampicillin/sulbactam (χ² = 4.422, p = 0.035), piperacillin/tazobactam (χ² = 17.519, p < 0.001), and cefazolin (χ² = 6.746, p = 0.009).Conclusions

The results demonstrate a high predominance of Enterobacteriaceae among clinical bacterial isolates from the evaluated oncology population. E. coli exhibited the highest proportion of MDR phenotypes (51.0%), whereas K. pneumoniae showed the highest frequency of XDR (32.2%). The high level of resistance observed among isolates from hospitalized patients could help guide empirical treatment toward alternative therapeutic options.

Related

  1. Eleven-Year Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance and Isolation Rates per 1000 Patient-Days of Key Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Türkiye (2014–2024)
    Reyhan Balkaya Demirtaş, Gökhan Metan, Gülçin Telli Dizman +3
    Infectious diseases & clinical microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity islands in mucosa-associated Escherichia coli in colorectal cancer patients
    Yara Y. El-Gendy, Mohamed A. El-Farrash, Mohamed Eldesoky +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in E. coli, Salmonella, and Enterobacter Species Isolated from Broiler Chicken Meat in Mzimba, Malawi: Insights from the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index.
    Abel Compbel Chipembo, Martin Henderson Kalumbi, Aminata Kamara +13
    Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Beyond the patient: Inanimate objects as reservoirs for potential pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial resistance patterns in hospital wards, a cross-sectional study from Goba Referral Hospital.
    Jemal Esmael, Mohammedaman Mama, Awel Kedir +1
    BMC microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  5. In vitro activity of contezolid against gram-positive bacteria isolated from pediatric patients with invasive infections
    Xinrong Li, Rubo Li, Suyun Qian +1
    Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
BibTeX
@article{valentemorales2026antimicrobial,
  title = {{Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated From Patients With Cancer.}},
  author = {Yetzil Valente-Morales and Sandra Quintana-Ponce and Margarita Y Kuri-Guinto and Sacnite D Díaz-Gonzaléz and Rocio G Hernández-Nava and Nicolás R Barlandas-Rendón},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.116860},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927103},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria Isolated From Patients With Cancer.
AU  - Yetzil Valente-Morales
AU  - Sandra Quintana-Ponce
AU  - Margarita Y Kuri-Guinto
AU  - Sacnite D Díaz-Gonzaléz
AU  - Rocio G Hernández-Nava
AU  - Nicolás R Barlandas-Rendón
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.116860
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42927103
AB  - Background  Cancer patients are at high risk of developing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms. Monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is essential for guiding treatment in this vulnerable population. This study aimed to evaluate AMR patterns and temporal evolution among clinical bacterial isolates-comparing pre-pandemic (2016-2019) versus pandemic (2020-2021) periods and care settings (outpatient vs. inpatient)-recovered from cancer patients at a tertiary care center in Guerrero, Mexico.Materials and methods  An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted between 2016 and 2021. A total of 1,019 strains were analyzed using WHONET 2023 software, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 cut-off values. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test (χ²). For antibiotics with absolute frequencies less than 5, Fisher's exact test was applied using STATA statistical software version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).Results  Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 73.1% of the isolates, with Escherichia coli (42.3%, n = 431) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.0%, n = 143) being the predominant strains. The overall prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) was 22.6%. In E. coli, an increase in resistance was observed starting in 2019, with resistance rates > 80.0% for ampicillin and cefixime. When comparing the 2020 period with 2021, resistance in E. coli increased significantly for ciprofloxacin (χ² = 4.144, p = 0.042) and ceftriaxone (χ² = 4.100, p = 0.043). Regarding MDR, 51.0% of E. coli isolates were MDR, while 32.2% of K. pneumoniae strains exhibited extensive drug resistance (XDR). In addition, possible pandrug-resistant (PDR) phenotypes were identified in 14.3% of Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Isolates from hospitalized patients showed higher resistance rates compared to those from outpatients with regard to E. coli for ampicillin/sulbactam (χ² = 4.422, p = 0.035), piperacillin/tazobactam (χ² = 17.519, p < 0.001), and cefazolin (χ² = 6.746, p = 0.009).Conclusions  The results demonstrate a high predominance of Enterobacteriaceae among clinical bacterial isolates from the evaluated oncology population. E. coli exhibited the highest proportion of MDR phenotypes (51.0%), whereas K. pneumoniae showed the highest frequency of XDR (32.2%). The high level of resistance observed among isolates from hospitalized patients could help guide empirical treatment toward alternative therapeutic options.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -