Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Functional Deficit from Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Middle-Aged and Older People

15 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Education Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, Chile
  2. 2Faculty of Education and Humanities, School of Sport Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile
  3. 3School of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 092301, Ecuador
  4. 4Escuela de Entrenador en Actividad Física y Deporte, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago 8370993, Chile
  5. 5Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca 3460000, Chile
  6. 6Vicerrectoría de Investigación e Innovación, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1100000, Chile
  7. 7Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile
  8. 8Laboratorio de Evaluación y Cuidado del Estado Nutricio, División de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro Universitario de Tonalá, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tonalá 45425, Jalisco, Mexico
  9. 9Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores en Antropometría Aplicada, 04120 Almería, Spain
  10. 10Marieb College of Health and Human Services, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA
  11. 11Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago 9170022, Chile
  12. 12Sports Coach Career, School of Education, Universidad Viña del Mar, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile
  13. 13Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca 3460000, Chile
  14. 14Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno 5290000, Chile
  15. 15Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena 1700000, Chile

Abstract

Background: Slow gait, weak handgrip strength, and impaired balance are common functional deficits in aging populations that predict adverse health outcomes. Accurate, scalable prediction tools are needed for community-based screening in low-resource settings. Objectives: To benchmark nine machine learning (ML) classifiers for predicting the presence of ≥1 functional deficit using cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors; to assess calibration, generalization, and clinical utility; to quantify the incremental value of these predictors over age and sex; and to characterize the stability of SHAP-based feature importance. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study 2012 (MHAS 2012) biomarker sub-study (N = 1961; mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years; 59.8% women). The outcome was ≥1 of slow gait (<0.8 m/s), weak handgrip (EWGSOP2 sex-specific cut-points), or inability to sustain a 10-s one-leg stance (prevalence 78.7%). Twenty cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors were used, excluding the functional measures used in outcome construction. Performance was estimated with nested, repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation (5 × 10 outer folds; inner 5-fold hyperparameter tuning), with all preprocessing confined to training folds. Results: Logistic Regression (LR) achieved the highest discrimination (AUC-ROC 0.751, 95% CI 0.724–0.779), with good calibration (scaled Brier 0.125; calibration slope 0.96) and a small overfit gap (0.011); no classifier outperformed it (ET: AUC 0.745). An age–sex model alone reached AUC 0.734; all other predictors added ΔAUC = +0.018 (95% CI 0.004–0.031), almost entirely through anthropometry, whereas blood biomarkers and blood pressure added no measurable discrimination. SHAP identified age, sex, height, body weight, and BMI × Age as the most influential features; BMI ranked 12th of 20 (bootstrap 95% rank interval 8–20). Conclusions: Cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors identify middle-aged and older Mexican people with ≥1 functional deficit with moderate accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.75), but most of the signal is carried by age, sex, and simple anthropometry. This reproducible, circularity- and leakage-free framework supports risk stratification rather than diagnosis, and requires external and temporal validation before clinical implementation.

Related

  1. Multi-Omics and Digital Biomarkers for Dynamic Cardiometabolic Risk Prediction
    Kexin Ding, Xiaoyi Li, Jun Zhang +1
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Obesity Phenotypes, and Novel Anthropometric Indices in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Central India
    Sanskruti Boob, Tanuja Manohar, Fahad Idrees Shaikh +6
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Inflammatory biomarkers show sex-specific associations with cardiometabolic disease and coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by coronary CT angiography
    Daniel O. Bittner, Caroline Roesner, Dorette Raaz-Schrauder +5
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Machine Learning in Dementia Research: Trends, Biomarkers, Prediction Goals, and Data Modalities
    Yao‐Chin Wang, Hsien Chang Yeh, Md. Mohaimenul Islam +1
    Brain and behaviorPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Needle-Free Bedside and Anthropometric Measures Show Weak Discrimination of an Adverse Blood-Biomarker Profile in Middle-Aged and Older Mexican Adults: An Internally Validated Machine-Learning Study
    Exal Garcia-Carrillo, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, Felipe Montalva-Valenzuela +7
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{urrutia2026machine,
  title = {{Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Functional Deficit from Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Middle-Aged and Older People}},
  author = {Jessica Mondaca Urrutia and Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda and Paz Pezoa-Fuentes and Yeny Concha-Cisternas and Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz and Carlos Abraham Herrera-Amante and Lawrence W. Judge and Claudio Farías-Valenzuela and Pablo Valdés-Badilla and Bastian Parada-Flores and Jordan Hernandez-Martínez and Exal Garcia-Carrillo},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218618},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8618},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Functional Deficit from Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Middle-Aged and Older People
AU  - Jessica Mondaca Urrutia
AU  - Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda
AU  - Paz Pezoa-Fuentes
AU  - Yeny Concha-Cisternas
AU  - Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz
AU  - Carlos Abraham Herrera-Amante
AU  - Lawrence W. Judge
AU  - Claudio Farías-Valenzuela
AU  - Pablo Valdés-Badilla
AU  - Bastian Parada-Flores
AU  - Jordan Hernandez-Martínez
AU  - Exal Garcia-Carrillo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218618
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8618
AB  - Background: Slow gait, weak handgrip strength, and impaired balance are common functional deficits in aging populations that predict adverse health outcomes. Accurate, scalable prediction tools are needed for community-based screening in low-resource settings. Objectives: To benchmark nine machine learning (ML) classifiers for predicting the presence of ≥1 functional deficit using cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors; to assess calibration, generalization, and clinical utility; to quantify the incremental value of these predictors over age and sex; and to characterize the stability of SHAP-based feature importance. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study 2012 (MHAS 2012) biomarker sub-study (N = 1961; mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years; 59.8% women). The outcome was ≥1 of slow gait (<0.8 m/s), weak handgrip (EWGSOP2 sex-specific cut-points), or inability to sustain a 10-s one-leg stance (prevalence 78.7%). Twenty cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors were used, excluding the functional measures used in outcome construction. Performance was estimated with nested, repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation (5 × 10 outer folds; inner 5-fold hyperparameter tuning), with all preprocessing confined to training folds. Results: Logistic Regression (LR) achieved the highest discrimination (AUC-ROC 0.751, 95% CI 0.724–0.779), with good calibration (scaled Brier 0.125; calibration slope 0.96) and a small overfit gap (0.011); no classifier outperformed it (ET: AUC 0.745). An age–sex model alone reached AUC 0.734; all other predictors added ΔAUC = +0.018 (95% CI 0.004–0.031), almost entirely through anthropometry, whereas blood biomarkers and blood pressure added no measurable discrimination. SHAP identified age, sex, height, body weight, and BMI × Age as the most influential features; BMI ranked 12th of 20 (bootstrap 95% rank interval 8–20). Conclusions: Cardiometabolic and anthropometric predictors identify middle-aged and older Mexican people with ≥1 functional deficit with moderate accuracy (AUC ≈ 0.75), but most of the signal is carried by age, sex, and simple anthropometry. This reproducible, circularity- and leakage-free framework supports risk stratification rather than diagnosis, and requires external and temporal validation before clinical implementation.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -