Disentangling the temporal signatures of conditioned pupil dilation: Distinct valence- and prediction-error-related components revealed by mega-analysis
- 1University of Siegen
Abstract
Pupil dilation offers a sensitive, non-invasive window into the neurocognitive processes supporting human associative learning. Yet, the field lacks consensus on how to quantify conditioned pupil responses, particularly which time intervals best serve as readouts. Moreover, it remains unresolved whether pupil dilation during learning reflects a unitary arousal signal or multiple (overlapping yet distinct) processes that unfold sequentially (e.g., cue valuation, uncertainty-driven attention, anticipation, prediction-error [PE] signaling). To address this, we conducted a large-scale individual-participant-data reanalysis (mega-analysis) of harmonized primary studies from our lab (K = 7 independent samples; total N = 385; 562 sessions), reprocessed through an identical pipeline, with systematic variation in outcome valence and modality. Temporal PCA of epochs locked either to the conditioned (CS) or unconditioned stimulus (US) yielded highly stable component structures across trials and studies, which carried dissociable information: An early (CS-locked) component selectively tracked appetitive value, distinguishing reward cues before aversive differentiation emerged. Later phases reflected differential conditioning across both valences, increasingly coupled to arousal toward US onset. Aversive learning was most specifically expressed in responses peaking around expected US delivery, which also predicted negative valence ratings. Two subsequent components captured unconditioned responding and its modulation by unexpected outcomes and omissions, consistent with unsigned PE signaling (amplified after aversive cues) and, later, positive PEs. Generalized additive mixed models largely converged with the PCA structure. Pupil dilation is therefore not a unitary marker of conditioning, but rather a high-resolution readout of sequential processes such as valuation, arousal/attention, and outcome updating, offering a promising framework for future computational models of learning.
Related
- Temporal signatures of prediction error reveal external forces on an embodied robot.
- Disentangling Context-Specific Alzheimer's Disease Progression Signatures through an Explainable AI Framework
- Disentangling maternal pregnancy and fetal-specific plasma signatures through integrated proteomics and site-specific N-glycoproteomics
- Two components of rapid temporal recalibration: a stimulus-driven shift and a decisional carryover dissociate across the senses
- Protein Language Model-Conditioned Graph Neural Networks for Multitask GPCR Ligand Activity Prediction
BibTeX
@misc{finke2026disentangling,
title = {{Disentangling the temporal signatures of conditioned pupil dilation: Distinct valence- and prediction-error-related components revealed by mega-analysis}},
author = {J. B. Finke and A. M. Schippers and H. Schaechinger and T. Klucken},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.64898/2026.07.16.737017},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.16.737017v2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Disentangling the temporal signatures of conditioned pupil dilation: Distinct valence- and prediction-error-related components revealed by mega-analysis
AU - J. B. Finke
AU - A. M. Schippers
AU - H. Schaechinger
AU - T. Klucken
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/16
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.07.16.737017
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.16.737017v2
AB - Pupil dilation offers a sensitive, non-invasive window into the neurocognitive processes supporting human associative learning. Yet, the field lacks consensus on how to quantify conditioned pupil responses, particularly which time intervals best serve as readouts. Moreover, it remains unresolved whether pupil dilation during learning reflects a unitary arousal signal or multiple (overlapping yet distinct) processes that unfold sequentially (e.g., cue valuation, uncertainty-driven attention, anticipation, prediction-error [PE] signaling). To address this, we conducted a large-scale individual-participant-data reanalysis (mega-analysis) of harmonized primary studies from our lab (K = 7 independent samples; total N = 385; 562 sessions), reprocessed through an identical pipeline, with systematic variation in outcome valence and modality. Temporal PCA of epochs locked either to the conditioned (CS) or unconditioned stimulus (US) yielded highly stable component structures across trials and studies, which carried dissociable information: An early (CS-locked) component selectively tracked appetitive value, distinguishing reward cues before aversive differentiation emerged. Later phases reflected differential conditioning across both valences, increasingly coupled to arousal toward US onset. Aversive learning was most specifically expressed in responses peaking around expected US delivery, which also predicted negative valence ratings. Two subsequent components captured unconditioned responding and its modulation by unexpected outcomes and omissions, consistent with unsigned PE signaling (amplified after aversive cues) and, later, positive PEs. Generalized additive mixed models largely converged with the PCA structure. Pupil dilation is therefore not a unitary marker of conditioning, but rather a high-resolution readout of sequential processes such as valuation, arousal/attention, and outcome updating, offering a promising framework for future computational models of learning.
ER -