Small grants as capacity building for community engaged research infrastructure: a multi-site case study of research centers in minority institutions
Abstract
Academic research institutions are increasingly looking for ways to build fair, meaningful, and mutually beneficial partnerships with community members and organizations that serve their communities. Small grant programs are emerging as a promising way to support these partnerships. Six Community Engagement Cores representing Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMIs) agreed to take part in a multi-site study of small grant programs. Researchers compared the programs to identify common themes and approaches. Despite differences in the types of projects, communities served, funding approaches, and program structures, the study found common strategies that enabled the small grant programs to become key elements of the larger university and RCMI infrastructure. Small grants helped create the foundation needed to support community-engaged research. These programs strengthened the conditions needed to build lasting partnerships between academic institutions and communities and to address health disparities. The biggest impact went beyond individual projects or partnerships. The programs helped build trust, encourage the sharing of knowledge, promote shared leadership, and strengthen the ability of both community members and researchers to conduct research focused on health priorities identified by the community. The success of small grant programs should not be measured only by traditional academic outcomes but also by their broader impact on communities and partnerships. By investing in community and academic research skills, improving administrative processes, and creating fairer funding opportunities, RCMIs can strengthen community engaged research and help produce meaningful improvements in the health of individuals and communities.
Related
- Identifying leverage points to sustain community-engaged research infrastructure in academic systems: a participatory systems science approach
- Implementation science infrastructure in U.S. academic institutions: a convergent mixed-methods study
- Mapping Country-Level Structural Capacity Constraints in Brachytherapy Infrastructure for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Americas: A cross-sectional study
- The relationship between disability and intrinsic capacity among older adults with disabilities in nursing institutions: a cross-sectional study.
- The Role of Community Pharmacies in Creating Harm Reduction Infrastructure to Address the US Opioid Crisis.
BibTeX
@article{dillard2026small,
title = {{Small grants as capacity building for community engaged research infrastructure: a multi-site case study of research centers in minority institutions}},
author = {Dorothy Dillard and Samantha Sabo and Caroline Mende and Kimberly R. Warren and Ehsan Abdalla and Carmen M. Vélez Vega and LaKeisha Williams and Emma Mitchell},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1981698},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1981698},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Small grants as capacity building for community engaged research infrastructure: a multi-site case study of research centers in minority institutions
AU - Dorothy Dillard
AU - Samantha Sabo
AU - Caroline Mende
AU - Kimberly R. Warren
AU - Ehsan Abdalla
AU - Carmen M. Vélez Vega
AU - LaKeisha Williams
AU - Emma Mitchell
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1981698
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1981698
AB - Academic research institutions are increasingly looking for ways to build fair, meaningful, and mutually beneficial partnerships with community members and organizations that serve their communities. Small grant programs are emerging as a promising way to support these partnerships. Six Community Engagement Cores representing Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMIs) agreed to take part in a multi-site study of small grant programs. Researchers compared the programs to identify common themes and approaches. Despite differences in the types of projects, communities served, funding approaches, and program structures, the study found common strategies that enabled the small grant programs to become key elements of the larger university and RCMI infrastructure. Small grants helped create the foundation needed to support community-engaged research. These programs strengthened the conditions needed to build lasting partnerships between academic institutions and communities and to address health disparities. The biggest impact went beyond individual projects or partnerships. The programs helped build trust, encourage the sharing of knowledge, promote shared leadership, and strengthen the ability of both community members and researchers to conduct research focused on health priorities identified by the community. The success of small grant programs should not be measured only by traditional academic outcomes but also by their broader impact on communities and partnerships. By investing in community and academic research skills, improving administrative processes, and creating fairer funding opportunities, RCMIs can strengthen community engaged research and help produce meaningful improvements in the health of individuals and communities.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -