Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYGynecologic Oncology Reports

Real-world experience with INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy: Tumor regression and MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1919 Old Spanish Trl, Houston, TX, 77054, USA; Corresponding authors.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1919 Old Spanish Trl, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
  3. 3Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
  4. 4Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 10 Duke Medicine Circ Durham, NC, 27710, USA
  5. 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1919 Old Spanish Trl, Houston, TX, 77054, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

Abstract

Objective: Achieving optimal brachytherapy coverage for bulky cervical tumors (>30 cc) remains challenging, and the ideal treatment approach is unclear. This study describes real-world tumor volume response, brachytherapy dose delivery, and toxicity in patients treated with an INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy regimen followed by chemoradiation and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Methods: This retrospective, two-institution cohort included eight patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin-based chemoradiation and MRI-guided brachytherapy. All three serial tumor measurements (at diagnosis, after induction chemotherapy, and after chemoradiation/before brachytherapy) were obtained by pelvic MRI. Gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured by the treating radiation oncologist; organ-at-risk volumes were delineated by treating physicians. Results: FIGO stage was IIIC1 in 6 patients, IIA in 1, and IB3 in 1. Five patients (62.5%) were PD-L1 positive. Seven patients received tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy and one received a Syed-Neblett interstitial implant. Median GTV was 88.3 cc (range 18–370) at diagnosis, 15.3 cc (range 0–187.1) after induction chemotherapy, and 2.2 cc (range 0–11.5) after chemoradiation. Median per-patient GTV reduction was 70% (range, 45–100%) after induction chemotherapy alone and 97% (range 74–100%) by completion of chemoradiation. Seven patients presented with bulky disease (>30 cc); three remained bulky after induction chemotherapy and none after chemoradiation. Median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 cumulative dose in 2-Gy fraction equivalents (EQ.D2) was 90.5 Gy (range 87–93.7) and median HR-CTV D98 was 79.8 Gy EQ.D2 (range 77.2–84.8; n = 7). Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity was more common during chemoradiation than during induction chemotherapy (neutropenia in 3/8 [37.5%] vs 1/8 [12.5%]; leukopenia in 2/8 [25%] vs 0/8 [0%]). Thrombocytopenia (1/8,12.5%) and one case of anemia were observed exclusively during induction chemotherapy. Two patients discontinued cisplatin early because of hematologic toxicity. Seven of eight patients achieved a complete metabolic response on PET at 3 months post-treatment and remained disease-free at last follow-up (median 62.4 months; range 23.0–72.9). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy produced substantial tumor regression that facilitated tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy in most patients while achieving EMBRACE-aligned HR-CTV doses with manageable, phase-specific toxicity. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant confirmation in larger, prospective, and comparative cohorts.

Related

  1. The Utility of Computed Tomography of the Chest at the Time of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Leukemia
    Maro Ohanian, Fieke W. Hoff, Vikas Kundra +10
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Early Induction of IVIg Improved the Performance Status and Enabled Chemotherapy Initiation in PCD-LEMS: A Case Report
    Tomohiro Tanaka, Akihiro Kitamura, Ryota Tamura +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyJ-STAGE
  3. Induction Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Jiayue Liu, Wei Deng, Xin Dong +11
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Utility of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Melanoma in the Contemporary Era and Experience with Modified Vinblastine–Cisplatin–Temozolomide at a Tertiary Care Center
    Woo Kyung Lee Doolittle, Rohit Rao, Malena Johnson +4
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Comparative efficacy and toxicity of two versus three induction chemotherapy cycles in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Renxian Xie, Xiaoluan Lin, Qiufeng Li +6
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{chavana2026realworld,
  title = {{Real-world experience with INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy: Tumor regression and MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer}},
  author = {Ashley Chavana and Madeline Flanagan and Amir Owrangi and Shelly Sharma and Claire Hoppenot and Jan Sunde and Anthony B. Costales and Spoorthi Kamepalli and Tracilyn Hall and Michelle Ludwig},
  journal = {Gynecologic Oncology Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.gore.2026.102231},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102231},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Real-world experience with INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy: Tumor regression and MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer
AU  - Ashley Chavana
AU  - Madeline Flanagan
AU  - Amir Owrangi
AU  - Shelly Sharma
AU  - Claire Hoppenot
AU  - Jan Sunde
AU  - Anthony B. Costales
AU  - Spoorthi Kamepalli
AU  - Tracilyn Hall
AU  - Michelle Ludwig
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Gynecologic Oncology Reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.gore.2026.102231
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102231
AB  - Objective: Achieving optimal brachytherapy coverage for bulky cervical tumors (>30 cc) remains challenging, and the ideal treatment approach is unclear. This study describes real-world tumor volume response, brachytherapy dose delivery, and toxicity in patients treated with an INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy regimen followed by chemoradiation and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Methods: This retrospective, two-institution cohort included eight patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin-based chemoradiation and MRI-guided brachytherapy. All three serial tumor measurements (at diagnosis, after induction chemotherapy, and after chemoradiation/before brachytherapy) were obtained by pelvic MRI. Gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured by the treating radiation oncologist; organ-at-risk volumes were delineated by treating physicians. Results: FIGO stage was IIIC1 in 6 patients, IIA in 1, and IB3 in 1. Five patients (62.5%) were PD-L1 positive. Seven patients received tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy and one received a Syed-Neblett interstitial implant. Median GTV was 88.3 cc (range 18–370) at diagnosis, 15.3 cc (range 0–187.1) after induction chemotherapy, and 2.2 cc (range 0–11.5) after chemoradiation. Median per-patient GTV reduction was 70% (range, 45–100%) after induction chemotherapy alone and 97% (range 74–100%) by completion of chemoradiation. Seven patients presented with bulky disease (>30 cc); three remained bulky after induction chemotherapy and none after chemoradiation. Median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 cumulative dose in 2-Gy fraction equivalents (EQ.D2) was 90.5 Gy (range 87–93.7) and median HR-CTV D98 was 79.8 Gy EQ.D2 (range 77.2–84.8; n = 7). Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity was more common during chemoradiation than during induction chemotherapy (neutropenia in 3/8 [37.5%] vs 1/8 [12.5%]; leukopenia in 2/8 [25%] vs 0/8 [0%]). Thrombocytopenia (1/8,12.5%) and one case of anemia were observed exclusively during induction chemotherapy. Two patients discontinued cisplatin early because of hematologic toxicity. Seven of eight patients achieved a complete metabolic response on PET at 3 months post-treatment and remained disease-free at last follow-up (median 62.4 months; range 23.0–72.9). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, INTERLACE-style induction chemotherapy produced substantial tumor regression that facilitated tandem-and-ovoid brachytherapy in most patients while achieving EMBRACE-aligned HR-CTV doses with manageable, phase-specific toxicity. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant confirmation in larger, prospective, and comparative cohorts.
SN  - 2352-5789
ER  -