Axion identification in multi-phase models
Abstract
Axion identification in multi-phase models is subtle because local mass eigenstates do not by themselves determine global properties such as the fundamental period and domain-wall number. In this paper, we develop a route to identify the axion in a broad class of multi-phase models, including DFSZ-like theories. The construction involves two reductions: gauge identification and integrating out heavy phase fields. We study these reductions explicitly in two representative two-phase models. Gauge identification reduces the compact field space of the phase fields to a quotient space by identifying points connected by gauge transformations, while integrating out heavy phase fields restricts the low-energy dynamics to nonlinear orbits. Under the stated assumptions and within the validity of the derivative expansion, the physical low-energy field space forms a finite union of S1. The axion is identified as the effective field on an S1 orbit and coincides locally with the lightest mass eigenstate near the vacuum. Its fundamental period and domain-wall number are well-defined and can be determined from the original Lagrangian. Nevertheless, the reduction to a single axion does not capture all properties of topological defects in the original multi-phase theory. In particular, axion strings can retain nontrivial gauge flux, while special defect configurations can involve non-negligible spacetime derivatives of the heavy phase fields and invalidate the single-field reduction. These effects represent fundamental differences between multi-phase and single-phase theories at the level of topological defects.
Related
- Knowledge-Driven XRD Phase Identification via Multi-View Retrieval and Explanation
- Wide-Mass-Scanning-Range Setup and Phase-Resolved Protocol for Axion Dark Matter Detection
- Magnetoelectric Phase Transition and Axion Dynamics
- Axion Misalignment Across First-Order Phase Transitions
- Phase transition dynamics of Abelian-Higgs vortices in the oscillating axion background
BibTeX
@misc{lei2026axion,
title = {{Axion identification in multi-phase models}},
author = {Zhen-Yu Lei and Jian-Wei Cui},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.24028},
eprint = {2610.24028},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24028},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Axion identification in multi-phase models
AU - Zhen-Yu Lei
AU - Jian-Wei Cui
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24028
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24028
AB - Axion identification in multi-phase models is subtle because local mass eigenstates do not by themselves determine global properties such as the fundamental period and domain-wall number. In this paper, we develop a route to identify the axion in a broad class of multi-phase models, including DFSZ-like theories. The construction involves two reductions: gauge identification and integrating out heavy phase fields. We study these reductions explicitly in two representative two-phase models. Gauge identification reduces the compact field space of the phase fields to a quotient space by identifying points connected by gauge transformations, while integrating out heavy phase fields restricts the low-energy dynamics to nonlinear orbits. Under the stated assumptions and within the validity of the derivative expansion, the physical low-energy field space forms a finite union of S^1. The axion is identified as the effective field on an S^1 orbit and coincides locally with the lightest mass eigenstate near the vacuum. Its fundamental period and domain-wall number are well-defined and can be determined from the original Lagrangian. Nevertheless, the reduction to a single axion does not capture all properties of topological defects in the original multi-phase theory. In particular, axion strings can retain nontrivial gauge flux, while special defect configurations can involve non-negligible spacetime derivatives of the heavy phase fields and invalidate the single-field reduction. These effects represent fundamental differences between multi-phase and single-phase theories at the level of topological defects.
ER -