Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYToxins

Active Function Improvement with Repeated Injections of Botulinum Toxin A in Upper Limb Spasticity: A Longitudinal Analysis from the ULIS-III Study.

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK.
  2. 2Regional Hyper-Acute Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Hospitals, London HA1 3UJ, UK.
  3. 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
  4. 4Neurorehabilitation, Gailtal-Klinik, 9620 Hermagor, Austria.
  5. 5Centro de Medicina de Reabilitaçãode Alcoitão, Serviço de Reabilitação de Adultos 3, 2649-506 Estoril, Portugal.
  6. 6Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
  7. 7Ipsen, Einsteinstraße 174, 81677 Munich, Germany.

Abstract

Improvement in active function (making it easier to use the limb) is a common goal following treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin (BoNT-A). ULIS-III was a large international, observational, longitudinal study (N = 953) conducted in the context of usual clinical practice over two years. In this secondary post hoc analysis, we examine whether goals for improvement in active function were met over repeated injection cycles. Patients were selected if improved active function (AF) was a primary/secondary goal for at least one cycle of treatment (n = 286/953). They were assessed at the start and end of each cycle using the Goal Attainment T-score alongside the Arm Activity measure (ArmA). Serial changes and predictors of improvement were explored. Across eight cycles, there were 1167 injections for active function, 875/1998 (44%) AF goals were set and 493 (57%) of those goals were achieved. Patients continued to show significant improvement in AF (p < 0.001) for each injection at least up to three cycles, which is likely to be clinically significant, especially in patients with milder spasticity who were naïve to BoNT-A. No statistically significant predictors were confirmed on mixed effects modeling. Conclusions: Repeated BoNT-A continued to produce significant improvement in active function for at least three cycles, regardless of patient- or treatment-related factors in this cohort, but type II errors due to small numbers cannot be excluded.

Related

  1. Botulinum toxin type a within function-oriented management of post-stroke spasticity: a narrative review
    Baoling Su, Yating Huang, Xiaotong Li +2
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Improving detection of candidates for botulinum toxin therapy in spasticity: an interprofessional screening approach
    Melanie Rudelstorfer, Brigitte Mayr-Pirker, Eugen Trinka +2
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Adjunctive extracorporeal shock wave therapy after botulinum toxin type A injection for post-stroke spasticity: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis
    Weihao Ke, Lujiang Wang, Wenli Shen +2
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Heterogeneity in nerve recovery patterns despite symptomatic improvement in paclitaxel-induced neuropathy : A longitudinal analysis
    Ikhyun Lim, Yong Wha Moon, MiRi Suh +1
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Repeated Specific Health Guidance and improvement of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged working men: a longitudinal observational study using modified Poisson regression
    Hiromi Yoshida, Atsuko Taguchi, Tomonori Okamura +1
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthJ-STAGE
BibTeX
@article{ashford2026active,
  title = {{Active Function Improvement with Repeated Injections of Botulinum Toxin A in Upper Limb Spasticity: A Longitudinal Analysis from the ULIS-III Study.}},
  author = {Stephen A Ashford and Mark Weatherall and Klemens Fheodoroff and Jorge Jacinto and Richard J Siegert and Christian Hannes and Lynne Turner-Stokes},
  journal = {Toxins},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/toxins18100429},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931520},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Active Function Improvement with Repeated Injections of Botulinum Toxin A in Upper Limb Spasticity: A Longitudinal Analysis from the ULIS-III Study.
AU  - Stephen A Ashford
AU  - Mark Weatherall
AU  - Klemens Fheodoroff
AU  - Jorge Jacinto
AU  - Richard J Siegert
AU  - Christian Hannes
AU  - Lynne Turner-Stokes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Toxins
DO  - 10.3390/toxins18100429
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931520
AB  - Improvement in active function (making it easier to use the limb) is a common goal following treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin (BoNT-A). ULIS-III was a large international, observational, longitudinal study (N = 953) conducted in the context of usual clinical practice over two years. In this secondary post hoc analysis, we examine whether goals for improvement in active function were met over repeated injection cycles. Patients were selected if improved active function (AF) was a primary/secondary goal for at least one cycle of treatment (n = 286/953). They were assessed at the start and end of each cycle using the Goal Attainment T-score alongside the Arm Activity measure (ArmA). Serial changes and predictors of improvement were explored. Across eight cycles, there were 1167 injections for active function, 875/1998 (44%) AF goals were set and 493 (57%) of those goals were achieved. Patients continued to show significant improvement in AF (p < 0.001) for each injection at least up to three cycles, which is likely to be clinically significant, especially in patients with milder spasticity who were naïve to BoNT-A. No statistically significant predictors were confirmed on mixed effects modeling. Conclusions: Repeated BoNT-A continued to produce significant improvement in active function for at least three cycles, regardless of patient- or treatment-related factors in this cohort, but type II errors due to small numbers cannot be excluded.
SN  - 2072-6651
ER  -