Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Ampère that years later would be done to him

Abstract

In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Ampère, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Ampère himself had given shape to his work.

Related

  1. The Whittaker-Maxwell Scaffolding. Scaffolding or template: what remains of a model when it is removed
    María Florentina Mendoza Urán
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral physicsarXiv
  2. The price of locality: Maxwell-Cattaneo charge transport in Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory
    Andrea Amoretti, Matteo Anselmi, Daniel K. Brattan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. A proposed E 8 × E 8 kinematic scaffolding for the standard model with pre-gravitation
    PRIYANK KAUSHIK, Vatsalya Vaibhav, Tejinder P. Singh
    Zeitschrift für Naturforschung APeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text24 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsOpenAlex
  4. Removing fringes from hyperspectral images using truncated singular value decomposition
    Dabin Kim, Young Jong Lee
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. On Removing Interaction from Quantum Proofs
    Nicholas Spooner, Max Tromanhauser
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{uran2026price,
  title = {{The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Ampère that years later would be done to him}},
  author = {María Florentina Mendoza Urán},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28525},
  eprint = {2609.28525},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28525},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Ampère that years later would be done to him
AU  - María Florentina Mendoza Urán
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28525
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28525
AB  - In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Ampère, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Ampère himself had given shape to his work.
ER  -