Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCWorld journal of radiology

Generalized multi-energy model for computing radiation treatment parameters on image domain and automated model-selection framework

  1. 1Department of Mathematics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 410001, Nigeria.

Abstract

This study developed a general n-energy mathematical model that predicts relative electron density (ρe), effective atomic number (Zef), mean excitation energy (I) and stopping power ratio (SPR) using computed tomography image, and developed an algorithm for best model selection. Mathematical proof is provided. Some numerical examples were carried out and the results were compared. The proposed method includes most of the existing methods as a special case. All the examples of the proposed method considered have modeling error that’s less than or equal to 0.85% and 0.89% for SPR and ρe, respectively, with mean error close to 0.00% and low median absolute error. The method was able to achieve modeling root mean square error of 0.85% and 1.61% for I and Zef, respectively, with some flexibility for improvement. The mathematical model showed to be more general by including most of the other existing models and presents a direction to formulating new ones. It shows little or no bias on prediction since it has mean error that is close to zero in almost all predictions and low median absolute error. The algorithm gives the leverage to select the best model, improve the model and automation.

Related

  1. Reservoir computing generalized: Exploiting complex dynamics via time-invariant transformation
    Tomoyuki Kubota, Sumito Tsunegi, Kohei Nakajima
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  2. Computing gravitational radiation from highly eccentric bound binaries in the small-mass-ratio limit
    Diego Andrés Rivera Orona, Scott A. Hughes
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Kantowski Sachs Cosmological Model with Radiation and Generalized Chaplygin Gas
    G. Oliveira-Neto, R. Hincho Laucata
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Expanding Clinical Applications and Improving Treatment Precision
    Michael D. Chuong, Sam Beddar
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Applied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  5. An interim analysis of acute treatment adverse events and patient reported quality of life for functional imaging guided salivary gland sparing radiation therapy using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Katelyn Cahill, Catriona Hargrave, Kane Miller +11
    Physics and imaging in radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chika2026generalized,
  title = {{Generalized multi-energy model for computing radiation treatment parameters on image domain and automated model-selection framework}},
  author = {Charles E Chika},
  journal = {World journal of radiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.4329/wjr.126287},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720571},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Generalized multi-energy model for computing radiation treatment parameters on image domain and automated model-selection framework
AU  - Charles E Chika
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - World journal of radiology
DO  - 10.4329/wjr.126287
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720571
AB  - This study developed a general n-energy mathematical model that predicts relative electron density (ρe), effective atomic number (Zef), mean excitation energy (I) and stopping power ratio (SPR) using computed tomography image, and developed an algorithm for best model selection. Mathematical proof is provided. Some numerical examples were carried out and the results were compared. The proposed method includes most of the existing methods as a special case. All the examples of the proposed method considered have modeling error that’s less than or equal to 0.85% and 0.89% for SPR and ρe, respectively, with mean error close to 0.00% and low median absolute error. The method was able to achieve modeling root mean square error of 0.85% and 1.61% for I and Zef, respectively, with some flexibility for improvement. The mathematical model showed to be more general by including most of the other existing models and presents a direction to formulating new ones. It shows little or no bias on prediction since it has mean error that is close to zero in almost all predictions and low median absolute error. The algorithm gives the leverage to select the best model, improve the model and automation.
SN  - 1949-8470
ER  -