Implementation of multisectoral interventions to improve nutrition in Uganda: stakeholder perceptions and experiences.
4 affiliations
- 1Division of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa. [email protected].
- 2Department of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda.
- 3Division of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.
- 4Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
Background
Malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa remains a persistent public health challenge driven by food insecurity, inadequate health services, suboptimal caregiving practices, and weak livelihoods. Addressing these complex determinants requires multisectoral interventions that integrate nutrition, health, agriculture, and community development. The Uganda Community Connector (UCC) programme was designed to address these challenges through integrated, community-based approaches. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of UCC implementation strategies using the RE-AIM framework.Methods
A cross-sectional qualitative study grounded in Participatory Action Research was conducted in six UCC implementation districts in Uganda. Data were collected through key informant interviews with policymakers, health workers, and implementers, and focus group discussions with community members, including lactating mothers, youth, and community leaders. Thematic content analysis was conducted using a combined deductive approach based on the RE-AIM framework and inductive coding for emerging themes.Results
The UCC programme achieved broad reach among vulnerable populations, particularly women of reproductive age, children under five years, and youth, through community mobilisation and use of local leadership and existing local systems. Study participants reported high adoption of integrated nutrition, health, WASH, agriculture, and livelihood practices among participating households, supported by participatory training and group-based platforms such as Village Savings and Loan Associations. Stakeholders reported perceived improvements in dietary practices, hygiene behaviours, health-seeking practices, women's empowerment, and household livelihoods, alongside strengthened linkages between communities and health services. However, implementation and adoption were constrained by environmental shocks, weak infrastructure, limited resources, gender norms, and inconsistent incentives for community volunteers. Sustainability of gains was strongest where community ownership, institutional capacity, and integration into district systems were present.Conclusion
The UCC programme demonstrates that integrated, community-led, and multisectoral approaches can improve nutrition and health-related behaviours in rural settings. However, sustaining and scaling such gains requires stronger institutional integration, continued capacity strengthening, adaptive implementation strategies, and inclusive engagement of marginalized groups, particularly men and vulnerable households.
Related
- From Evidence to Intervention: A Systematic, Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Developing and Prioritizing Diagnostic Excellence Interventions Across a 14-Site Hospital Medicine Collaborative
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
- Pre-implementation barriers and facilitators to implementing a physical activity guideline for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a qualitative stakeholder study
- Evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of a nursing internship program using the CIPP framework: identifying strengths, weaknesses, and perception gaps between students and instructors
- Stakeholder perceptions of the acceptability of an intervention to improve uptake of evidence-based emergency myocardial infarction care in Tanzania: A qualitative study
BibTeX
@article{agaba2026implementation,
title = {{Implementation of multisectoral interventions to improve nutrition in Uganda: stakeholder perceptions and experiences.}},
author = {Edgar Agaba and Peter Rukundo and Per Ole Iversen and Xikombiso Mbhenyane},
journal = {BMC nutrition},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s40795-026-01433-x},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902411},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Implementation of multisectoral interventions to improve nutrition in Uganda: stakeholder perceptions and experiences.
AU - Edgar Agaba
AU - Peter Rukundo
AU - Per Ole Iversen
AU - Xikombiso Mbhenyane
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC nutrition
DO - 10.1186/s40795-026-01433-x
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902411
AB - Background Malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa remains a persistent public health challenge driven by food insecurity, inadequate health services, suboptimal caregiving practices, and weak livelihoods. Addressing these complex determinants requires multisectoral interventions that integrate nutrition, health, agriculture, and community development. The Uganda Community Connector (UCC) programme was designed to address these challenges through integrated, community-based approaches. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of UCC implementation strategies using the RE-AIM framework.Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study grounded in Participatory Action Research was conducted in six UCC implementation districts in Uganda. Data were collected through key informant interviews with policymakers, health workers, and implementers, and focus group discussions with community members, including lactating mothers, youth, and community leaders. Thematic content analysis was conducted using a combined deductive approach based on the RE-AIM framework and inductive coding for emerging themes.Results The UCC programme achieved broad reach among vulnerable populations, particularly women of reproductive age, children under five years, and youth, through community mobilisation and use of local leadership and existing local systems. Study participants reported high adoption of integrated nutrition, health, WASH, agriculture, and livelihood practices among participating households, supported by participatory training and group-based platforms such as Village Savings and Loan Associations. Stakeholders reported perceived improvements in dietary practices, hygiene behaviours, health-seeking practices, women's empowerment, and household livelihoods, alongside strengthened linkages between communities and health services. However, implementation and adoption were constrained by environmental shocks, weak infrastructure, limited resources, gender norms, and inconsistent incentives for community volunteers. Sustainability of gains was strongest where community ownership, institutional capacity, and integration into district systems were present.Conclusion The UCC programme demonstrates that integrated, community-led, and multisectoral approaches can improve nutrition and health-related behaviours in rural settings. However, sustaining and scaling such gains requires stronger institutional integration, continued capacity strengthening, adaptive implementation strategies, and inclusive engagement of marginalized groups, particularly men and vulnerable households.
SN - 2055-0928
ER -