Dynamic regularized borrowing—an approach for binary outcomes in single‑arm trials
Abstract
Single-arm clinical trials with binary outcomes often face enrollment challenges, particularly in rare diseases and oncology, where limited sample sizes can reduce estimation precision. Borrowing information from historical trials can improve estimation efficiency, but naïve pooling may introduce bias and inflate false-positive rates when historical and current data are heterogeneous. We propose a data-adaptive borrowing approach, termed Regularized Borrowing (RB), based on a regularized likelihood approach with conditional Bayesian interpretation, for single-arm trials with binary outcomes. The RB method incorporates historical data through a regularization framework that calibrates the degree of borrowing by minimizing the reference-based mean squared error (MSE) of the current-study estimator. The borrowing parameter is selected using a bootstrap-based objective evaluated via repeated cross-fitting, allowing RB to adaptively balance bias and variance without requiring strong exchangeability assumptions or prior specification of borrowing strength. Through simulation studies, we show that RB down-weights incompatible historical information while improving estimation efficiency relative to independent analysis and several existing Bayesian borrowing methods. As with other data-adaptive borrowing approaches, empirical false-positive rate inflation was observed in some scenarios, with the greatest inflation occurring in smaller-sample and more discordant settings. An application to real clinical trial data illustrates the practical advantages of RB in reducing uncertainty while maintaining robust performance under heterogeneity. Although this manuscript focuses on binary outcomes in single‑arm trials, the proposed RB framework is not specific to this setting and is conceptually extendable to other outcome types and trial designs, including randomized controlled trials.
Related
- Standardized Dynamic Borrowing: Uniform Control of Information Borrowing
- From priors to performance: enhancing statistical efficiency with Bayesian dynamic borrowing
- Evaluating prognostic score adjustment and information borrowing in randomized trials with binary endpoints
- Regularized Sequential Reconstructions of Dynamic Nonsmooth Sources from Sparse Boundary Flux Data
- A Latent-Space Statistical Learning Framework for Semicontinuous Outcomes: Regularized Deviance and Boundary-Stabilized Optimization
BibTeX
@article{hasan2026dynamic,
title = {{Dynamic regularized borrowing—an approach for binary outcomes in single‑arm trials}},
author = {Mohamad Hasan and Kate Stromberg and Zhilong Yuan and Kirk A. Keegan and Hind Stitou and Fei Chen and Xiaoming Li and Hussein Sweiti and Xiang Li},
journal = {Trials},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s13063-026-10003-2},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-026-10003-2},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Dynamic regularized borrowing—an approach for binary outcomes in single‑arm trials
AU - Mohamad Hasan
AU - Kate Stromberg
AU - Zhilong Yuan
AU - Kirk A. Keegan
AU - Hind Stitou
AU - Fei Chen
AU - Xiaoming Li
AU - Hussein Sweiti
AU - Xiang Li
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - Trials
DO - 10.1186/s13063-026-10003-2
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-026-10003-2
AB - Single-arm clinical trials with binary outcomes often face enrollment challenges, particularly in rare diseases and oncology, where limited sample sizes can reduce estimation precision. Borrowing information from historical trials can improve estimation efficiency, but naïve pooling may introduce bias and inflate false-positive rates when historical and current data are heterogeneous. We propose a data-adaptive borrowing approach, termed Regularized Borrowing (RB), based on a regularized likelihood approach with conditional Bayesian interpretation, for single-arm trials with binary outcomes. The RB method incorporates historical data through a regularization framework that calibrates the degree of borrowing by minimizing the reference-based mean squared error (MSE) of the current-study estimator. The borrowing parameter is selected using a bootstrap-based objective evaluated via repeated cross-fitting, allowing RB to adaptively balance bias and variance without requiring strong exchangeability assumptions or prior specification of borrowing strength. Through simulation studies, we show that RB down-weights incompatible historical information while improving estimation efficiency relative to independent analysis and several existing Bayesian borrowing methods. As with other data-adaptive borrowing approaches, empirical false-positive rate inflation was observed in some scenarios, with the greatest inflation occurring in smaller-sample and more discordant settings. An application to real clinical trial data illustrates the practical advantages of RB in reducing uncertainty while maintaining robust performance under heterogeneity. Although this manuscript focuses on binary outcomes in single‑arm trials, the proposed RB framework is not specific to this setting and is conceptually extendable to other outcome types and trial designs, including randomized controlled trials.
SN - 1745-6215
ER -