Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in oncology

Local control after stereotactic radiation for thyroid cancer: a histology risk-stratified analysis

  1. 1Northwell Health , , ,

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s): Recurrent and metastatic non-anaplastic thyroid cancer has traditionally been considered relatively radioresistant. We evaluated whether anatomic site or histology risk group better predicts local control (LC) following stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT/SRS).

Materials/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with 66 treated lesions (42 skeletal, 24 non-skeletal) treated between 2012 and 2025. Histology was dichotomized into low-risk (papillary, follicular, medullary, Hürthle cell; n=61) and high-risk (poorly differentiated and squamous cell carcinoma; n=5). BED ₁₀ was calculated using α/β = 10 Gy. LC was defined per RECIST 1.1. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used. Intra-patient correlation was addressed via generalized estimating equations (GEE) and Cox shared frailty models. A multivariable GEE model included histology risk, site, BED ₁₀ , PTV volume, prior surgery, and age.

Results: Median follow-up was 15.0 months. Six local failures occurred (crude LC 90.9%); 1- and 2-year LC were 96.5% and 87.1%. Histology risk was the dominant determinant: low-risk histology achieved 95.1% crude LC versus 40.0% for high-risk (log-rank p=0.002). In multivariable GEE analysis, low-risk histology was independently associated with LC (OR 158.0, 95% CI 1.72–14,479.7; p=0.028), whereas skeletal site was not (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.02–51.8; p=0.974). BED ₁₀ was not associated with LC after adjustment (p=0.752). Skeletal and non-skeletal LC were similar after histology stratification (95.0% vs 95.2% among low-risk). Treatment was well tolerated; no Grade ≥3 radiation toxicity, myelopathy, or fractures occurred.

Conclusion: In stereotactic radiation for metastatic non-anaplastic thyroid cancer, histology risk grouping—not anatomic site or dose escalation—is the dominant predictor of local control. These findings support histology-based risk stratification for SRT patient selection.

Related

  1. Stereotactic body radiation therapy enriches mediators of humoral immune activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Nicholas J Salgia, Adil Khan, Yu Fujiwara +8
    Journal for immunotherapy of cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textImmunologyOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Oligoprogressive Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Switching to a New Systemic Therapy
    Ciro Franzese, Matteo Perrino, Nadia Cordua +13
    European urology open sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Efficacy and safety of narlumosbart in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy followed by first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in advanced driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases: a phase II, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial protocol
    Jin Li, Nianlan Zhou, Saiquan Lu +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Histology-Stratified Clinical and Prognostic Associations of PDCD-Related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Seong-Tae Kim, Yunha Lee, Se-Young Yun +8
    GenesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. A prospective pilot study of urine microRNA as a biomarker of urinary radiation toxicity following MRI-guided prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Urszula Smyczyńska, Zuzanna Nowicka, Patrick Doyle +7
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gui2026local,
  title = {{Local control after stereotactic radiation for thyroid cancer: a histology risk-stratified analysis}},
  author = {Bin Gui and Jayavignesh Sekar and Margaret Locke and Shyamali Saha and Mitchell Tulchinsky and Brianna Jones and Nagashree Seetharamu and Maged Ghaly},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1898567},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661363},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Local control after stereotactic radiation for thyroid cancer: a histology risk-stratified analysis
AU  - Bin Gui
AU  - Jayavignesh Sekar
AU  - Margaret Locke
AU  - Shyamali Saha
AU  - Mitchell Tulchinsky
AU  - Brianna Jones
AU  - Nagashree Seetharamu
AU  - Maged Ghaly
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1898567
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661363
AB  - Purpose/Objective(s): Recurrent and metastatic non-anaplastic thyroid cancer has traditionally been considered relatively radioresistant. We evaluated whether anatomic site or histology risk group better predicts local control (LC) following stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT/SRS).  Materials/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with 66 treated lesions (42 skeletal, 24 non-skeletal) treated between 2012 and 2025. Histology was dichotomized into low-risk (papillary, follicular, medullary, Hürthle cell; n=61) and high-risk (poorly differentiated and squamous cell carcinoma; n=5). BED ₁₀ was calculated using α/β = 10 Gy. LC was defined per RECIST 1.1. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used. Intra-patient correlation was addressed via generalized estimating equations (GEE) and Cox shared frailty models. A multivariable GEE model included histology risk, site, BED ₁₀ , PTV volume, prior surgery, and age.  Results: Median follow-up was 15.0 months. Six local failures occurred (crude LC 90.9%); 1- and 2-year LC were 96.5% and 87.1%. Histology risk was the dominant determinant: low-risk histology achieved 95.1% crude LC versus 40.0% for high-risk (log-rank p=0.002). In multivariable GEE analysis, low-risk histology was independently associated with LC (OR 158.0, 95% CI 1.72–14,479.7; p=0.028), whereas skeletal site was not (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.02–51.8; p=0.974). BED ₁₀ was not associated with LC after adjustment (p=0.752). Skeletal and non-skeletal LC were similar after histology stratification (95.0% vs 95.2% among low-risk). Treatment was well tolerated; no Grade ≥3 radiation toxicity, myelopathy, or fractures occurred.  Conclusion: In stereotactic radiation for metastatic non-anaplastic thyroid cancer, histology risk grouping—not anatomic site or dose escalation—is the dominant predictor of local control. These findings support histology-based risk stratification for SRT patient selection.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -