Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Intranasal Mometasone After External Dacryocystorhinostomy—Necessity or Convention? A Retrospective Two-Centre Cohort Study

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Fundación Oftalmológica Médica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FOM), 46015 Valencia, Spain
  2. 2Department of Oculoplastics, Clínica Baviera, 46005 Valencia, Spain
  3. 3Surgery Department, Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 15, 46010 Valencia, Spain
  4. 4Spanish Network of Inflammatory Diseases: REI-RICORS (RD24/0007/0004) of the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Government, 28029 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Intranasal corticosteroids are frequently prescribed after dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) to modulate mucosal healing and prevent ostium closure, but evidence supporting their use after external DCR (EXT-DCR) is scarce. This study compared early anatomical success after EXT-DCR under two centre-specific postoperative protocols that differed in the use of intranasal mometasone. Methods: Retrospective comparative cohort study of 243 consecutive EXT-DCR procedures (211 patients) for distal lacrimal obstruction performed by a single surgeon using the same technique at two centres between 2019 and 2025. Postoperative treatment was determined by each centre’s standing protocol: both included oral amoxicillin–clavulanic acid for one week, and one centre additionally prescribed intranasal mometasone furoate twice daily for two months (mometasone group, n = 64; control group, n = 179). The primary outcome was anatomical success, defined as lacrimal patency on irrigation at two months. Groups were compared with Fisher’s exact test and a multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results: Anatomical success was 93.8% (60/64) in the mometasone group and 89.9% (161/179) in the control group (absolute difference 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI −5.7 to 10.3; p = 0.45). After adjustment for age and sex, treatment group was not significantly associated with success (control vs. mometasone: OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.18–1.77; p = 0.33). No statistically significant associations were detected for age or sex. Conclusions: In this cohort, adding a two-month course of intranasal mometasone to standard postoperative care after EXT-DCR was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in early anatomical success. Given the limited statistical power and a confidence interval that does not exclude a clinically meaningful benefit, this absence of a significant difference does not establish therapeutic equivalence. Adequately powered prospective trials with longer follow-up are needed before routine intranasal corticosteroid use after EXT-DCR can be either recommended or abandoned.

Related

  1. Orbital apex syndrome caused by imaging-occult sphenoid sinus fungal infection and the necessity of early surgical exploration: a retrospective case series.
    Zhixing Li, Weibin Liu, Yanchen Zhang +3
    BMC ophthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in treating chronic dacryocystitis
    Zhang Cai, Jingfeng Wang, Zuhong Chen +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Racial differences in reoperation rates following dacryocystorhinostomy
    Nir Erdinest, Andrzej Grzybowski, Tehila Shlomov +5
    BMC OphthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcomes of External Dacryocystorhinostomy in a Public Tertiary Training Hospital in the Philippines.
    Ma Carmela Tanchuling-Tablante, Alexander D Tan
    Acta medica PhilippinaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. Molecular Diagnosis as a Probability of Necessity
    J. W. Belmont, C. J. Williams, C. A. Shaw
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{ortegaevangelio2026intranasal,
  title = {{Intranasal Mometasone After External Dacryocystorhinostomy—Necessity or Convention? A Retrospective Two-Centre Cohort Study}},
  author = {Leticia Ortega-Evangelio and Gonzalo Roig-Ferreruela and Cristina Peris-Martínez},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218505},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8505},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intranasal Mometasone After External Dacryocystorhinostomy—Necessity or Convention? A Retrospective Two-Centre Cohort Study
AU  - Leticia Ortega-Evangelio
AU  - Gonzalo Roig-Ferreruela
AU  - Cristina Peris-Martínez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218505
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8505
AB  - Background/Objectives: Intranasal corticosteroids are frequently prescribed after dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) to modulate mucosal healing and prevent ostium closure, but evidence supporting their use after external DCR (EXT-DCR) is scarce. This study compared early anatomical success after EXT-DCR under two centre-specific postoperative protocols that differed in the use of intranasal mometasone. Methods: Retrospective comparative cohort study of 243 consecutive EXT-DCR procedures (211 patients) for distal lacrimal obstruction performed by a single surgeon using the same technique at two centres between 2019 and 2025. Postoperative treatment was determined by each centre’s standing protocol: both included oral amoxicillin–clavulanic acid for one week, and one centre additionally prescribed intranasal mometasone furoate twice daily for two months (mometasone group, n = 64; control group, n = 179). The primary outcome was anatomical success, defined as lacrimal patency on irrigation at two months. Groups were compared with Fisher’s exact test and a multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results: Anatomical success was 93.8% (60/64) in the mometasone group and 89.9% (161/179) in the control group (absolute difference 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI −5.7 to 10.3; p = 0.45). After adjustment for age and sex, treatment group was not significantly associated with success (control vs. mometasone: OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.18–1.77; p = 0.33). No statistically significant associations were detected for age or sex. Conclusions: In this cohort, adding a two-month course of intranasal mometasone to standard postoperative care after EXT-DCR was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in early anatomical success. Given the limited statistical power and a confidence interval that does not exclude a clinically meaningful benefit, this absence of a significant difference does not establish therapeutic equivalence. Adequately powered prospective trials with longer follow-up are needed before routine intranasal corticosteroid use after EXT-DCR can be either recommended or abandoned.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -