Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Detecting Random Mutations in 16S rRNA Sequences

  1. 1University of Maryland

Abstract

Motivation: High-throughput sequencing technologies have driven rapid growth of biological sequence databases. Public repositories must therefore rely on automated computational heuristics to screen submitted sequences for errors and low quality. For example, SILVA SSU Ref, which exploits the conserved nature of 16S and 18S rRNA sequences, applies strict algorithmic quality controls yet still accepts sequences with up to 30% of their nucleotides deviating from any previously accepted sequence. This permissiveness creates opportunities for the admission of modified sequences, such as biologically plausible sequences generated by DNA foundation models. The vulnerability of public sequence databases to becoming polluted or poisoned with modified sequences necessitates the development of methods to detect such sequences. Results: We present the first investigation, to our knowledge, of the detectability of modified sequences. We consider simple computationally-modified 16S rRNA sequences that pass the quality control inclusion criteria of the SILVA database, which we generate via random substitutions. We present classifiers that can distinguish such modified sequences from natural 16S rRNA using conserved motifs. Our best classifier achieves over 90% sensitivity and specificity on our testing set when using a 5% artificial mutation rate. One feature used in our classifiers, gapped k-mers constructed from universally conserved nucleotides, was conserved across all three domains of life despite relying on exact matches to patterns found in E. coli, advancing our understanding of conserved grammatical structure in small subunit rRNA sequences. Availability and Implementation: Our source code is available at https://github.com/rainhaworth/16S-Mutation-Classifiers.

Related

  1. Towards a Comprehensive Screening Approach for Detecting Gene Doping in Racehorses and Sport Horses by Targeting Common and Intrinsic Plasmid Sequences
    Angèle Paz, Sophie Dhorne-Pollet, Benoit Loup +4
    Drug Testing and AnalysisPeer-reviewedLicence not stated1 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  2. GenBank mining reveals novel insights into Rhizobium phylogeny: Identical 16S rRNA sequences are mainly uncoupled from species designation, host plant, and geographic origin: How this search suggested the definition of a direct ‘microbial h-index’
    Rosella Muresu, Monica Rodriguez, Andrea Squartini
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyCell biologyPLOS
  3. SCAR: Controlled mutations, ancient DNA damage, and fragmentation of fasta and fastq sequences
    M. Hartmann, M. V. Westbury
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  4. vafSOMA: Detecting cell-layer-fixed somatic mutations in plants
    M. Zhou, F. Johannes
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Development of Sensitive Droplet Digital PCR Assays for Detecting Urinary TERT Promoter Mutations as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Detection of Urothelial Cancer
    Md Ismail Hosen, Nathalie Forey, Geoffroy Durand +23
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text47 citedGeneral biologyOncologyHAL
BibTeX
@misc{haworth2026detecting,
  title = {{Detecting Random Mutations in 16S rRNA Sequences}},
  author = {R. M. Haworth and S. Commichaux and M. Pop},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.753821},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.753821v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Detecting Random Mutations in 16S rRNA Sequences
AU  - R. M. Haworth
AU  - S. Commichaux
AU  - M. Pop
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.24.753821
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.753821v1
AB  - Motivation: High-throughput sequencing technologies have driven rapid growth of biological sequence databases. Public repositories must therefore rely on automated computational heuristics to screen submitted sequences for errors and low quality. For example, SILVA SSU Ref, which exploits the conserved nature of 16S and 18S rRNA sequences, applies strict algorithmic quality controls yet still accepts sequences with up to 30% of their nucleotides deviating from any previously accepted sequence. This permissiveness creates opportunities for the admission of modified sequences, such as biologically plausible sequences generated by DNA foundation models. The vulnerability of public sequence databases to becoming polluted or poisoned with modified sequences necessitates the development of methods to detect such sequences. Results: We present the first investigation, to our knowledge, of the detectability of modified sequences. We consider simple computationally-modified 16S rRNA sequences that pass the quality control inclusion criteria of the SILVA database, which we generate via random substitutions. We present classifiers that can distinguish such modified sequences from natural 16S rRNA using conserved motifs. Our best classifier achieves over 90% sensitivity and specificity on our testing set when using a 5% artificial mutation rate. One feature used in our classifiers, gapped k-mers constructed from universally conserved nucleotides, was conserved across all three domains of life despite relying on exact matches to patterns found in E. coli, advancing our understanding of conserved grammatical structure in small subunit rRNA sequences. Availability and Implementation: Our source code is available at https://github.com/rainhaworth/16S-Mutation-Classifiers.
ER  -