Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJAMA network open

Skin Toxic Effects and Survival With Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

16 more authors
9 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  2. 2Internal Medical Residency Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  3. 3Department of Dermatology, UT Health Houston, Houston, Texas.
  4. 4Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  5. 5Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  6. 6Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  7. 7Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  8. 8Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
  9. 9Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Abstract

Importance

Skin toxic effects are a common early adverse event of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) therapy, but its association with clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line therapy remains uncertain.Objective

To evaluate the association between treatment-emergent skin toxic effects and clinical outcomes among patients receiving first-line EVP.Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center among adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy between March 3, 2022, and July 31, 2025. Skin toxic effects were used as a time-dependent exposure in Cox proportional hazards regression to account for immortal-time bias. Prespecified sequential adjustment models and 30-day landmark analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.Exposure

Treatment-emergent skin toxic effects (rash or pruritus) were identified from medical records.Main outcomes and measures

Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS were measured from EVP therapy initiation to the respective event or last follow-up. ORR was evaluated among patients with a response assessment after the 30-day landmark, according to skin toxic effects status within the first 30 days.Results

Among 185 patients (median age, 73 [IQR, 67-79] years; 140 [75.7%] male), skin toxic effects occurred in 98 (53.0%) at a median of 14 (IQR, 7-28) days after EVP therapy initiation. Skin toxic effects of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10 patients (5.4%). Skin toxic effects resulted in EV dose reduction in 31 patients (16.8%), treatment interruption in 20 (10.8%), and treatment discontinuation in 9 (4.9%). At a median follow-up of 17.7 (IQR, 11.3-24.2) months, Simon-Makuch curves demonstrated longer OS and PFS among all patients and longer OS among patients with visceral metastases in the skin toxic effects stratum than in the no toxicity stratum. In adjusted time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression, skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57]). The association remained consistent across sequential adjustment models and prespecified 30-day landmark analyses. In the 30-day landmark analyses, associations with PFS and ORR remained directionally favorable but were attenuated after multivariable adjustment.Conclusions and relevance

In this cohort study of 185 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy, treatment-emergent skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS. These findings support further prospective validation of skin toxic effects as an early clinical marker of treatment benefit and investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying this association.

Related

  1. Concurrent erythema multiforme and psoriasiform eruption during enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma
    Rossella Di Trolio, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
    Archive of Clinical CasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Circulating Tumor DNA Clearance Is Associated with Response and Survival in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab
    Adam Khorasanchi, Sayan Mullick Chowdhury, Eric Fei Hong +19
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  3. Skin toxicity and effectiveness of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for urothelial carcinoma: a prospective multicenter real-world study in Japan.
    K Tamura, T Tsujino, R Taoka +24
    ESMO real world data and digital oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
    Thomas Powles, Tibor Csőszi, Mustafa Özgüroğlu +255
    Lancet OncologyPeer-reviewedLicence not stated642 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  5. Initial Enfortumab Vedotin Dose Reduction and Outcomes in Pretreated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
    In-Ho Kim, Chang Gon Kim, Jungmin Jo +15
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
BibTeX
@article{thomas2026skin,
  title = {{Skin Toxic Effects and Survival With Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.}},
  author = {Zachariah Thomas and Cindy Y Jiang and Patrick J Speck and Emanuele Crupi and Mohammad Jad Moussa and Adrienne Joseph and Carly Stender and Michael Glover and Andrew C Johns and Jianjun Gao and Monica Desai and Amishi Y Shah and Sangeeta Goswami and Arlene Siefker-Radtke and Anishia-Rawther Karedath and Sheeba P Varughese and Wenhong Ren and Comron Hassanzadeh and Kelly K Bree and Ashish M Kamat and Charles C Guo and Omar Pacha and Anisha Patel and Jonathan Curry and Alex D Sherry and Pavlos Msaouel and Matthew T Campbell and Omar Alhalabi},
  journal = {JAMA network open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39517},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900474},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Skin Toxic Effects and Survival With Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.
AU  - Zachariah Thomas
AU  - Cindy Y Jiang
AU  - Patrick J Speck
AU  - Emanuele Crupi
AU  - Mohammad Jad Moussa
AU  - Adrienne Joseph
AU  - Carly Stender
AU  - Michael Glover
AU  - Andrew C Johns
AU  - Jianjun Gao
AU  - Monica Desai
AU  - Amishi Y Shah
AU  - Sangeeta Goswami
AU  - Arlene Siefker-Radtke
AU  - Anishia-Rawther Karedath
AU  - Sheeba P Varughese
AU  - Wenhong Ren
AU  - Comron Hassanzadeh
AU  - Kelly K Bree
AU  - Ashish M Kamat
AU  - Charles C Guo
AU  - Omar Pacha
AU  - Anisha Patel
AU  - Jonathan Curry
AU  - Alex D Sherry
AU  - Pavlos Msaouel
AU  - Matthew T Campbell
AU  - Omar Alhalabi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - JAMA network open
DO  - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39517
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900474
AB  - Importance  Skin toxic effects are a common early adverse event of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) therapy, but its association with clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line therapy remains uncertain.Objective  To evaluate the association between treatment-emergent skin toxic effects and clinical outcomes among patients receiving first-line EVP.Design, setting, and participants  This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center among adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy between March 3, 2022, and July 31, 2025. Skin toxic effects were used as a time-dependent exposure in Cox proportional hazards regression to account for immortal-time bias. Prespecified sequential adjustment models and 30-day landmark analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.Exposure  Treatment-emergent skin toxic effects (rash or pruritus) were identified from medical records.Main outcomes and measures  Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS were measured from EVP therapy initiation to the respective event or last follow-up. ORR was evaluated among patients with a response assessment after the 30-day landmark, according to skin toxic effects status within the first 30 days.Results  Among 185 patients (median age, 73 [IQR, 67-79] years; 140 [75.7%] male), skin toxic effects occurred in 98 (53.0%) at a median of 14 (IQR, 7-28) days after EVP therapy initiation. Skin toxic effects of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10 patients (5.4%). Skin toxic effects resulted in EV dose reduction in 31 patients (16.8%), treatment interruption in 20 (10.8%), and treatment discontinuation in 9 (4.9%). At a median follow-up of 17.7 (IQR, 11.3-24.2) months, Simon-Makuch curves demonstrated longer OS and PFS among all patients and longer OS among patients with visceral metastases in the skin toxic effects stratum than in the no toxicity stratum. In adjusted time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression, skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57]). The association remained consistent across sequential adjustment models and prespecified 30-day landmark analyses. In the 30-day landmark analyses, associations with PFS and ORR remained directionally favorable but were attenuated after multivariable adjustment.Conclusions and relevance  In this cohort study of 185 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy, treatment-emergent skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS. These findings support further prospective validation of skin toxic effects as an early clinical marker of treatment benefit and investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying this association.
SN  - 2574-3805
ER  -