Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NPJ Precision Oncology
Moving beyond the neutral-Darwinian dichotomy to inform precision oncology
5 affiliations
- 1Centre for Immuno-Oncology, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
- 3Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
- 4Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- 5Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
Abstract
Current methods for distinguishing neutral from selection-driven tumour evolution rely on assumptions frequently violated in clinical samples. We argue that tumour evolution is not a binary state, but a dynamic continuum shaped by genetic and non-genetic heterogeneity, spatial constraints, microenvironmental pressures and therapeutic bottlenecks. Refining evolutionary inference through integrative, longitudinal and spatially resolved analyses will be essential to align these models with therapeutic decision-making in precision oncology.
Related
- Moving Beyond the Plateau in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-The Imperative of Early Referral and Precision Strategies.
- Precision surgical oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma
- Unravelling the biological divergence of CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders with skin involvement: from clinical risk to precision oncology
- Evolution of Precision Oncology, Personalized Medicine, and Molecular Tumor Boards
- Editorial: Artificial intelligence and anti-cancer drugs: advancing discovery, personalization, and precision oncology
BibTeX
@article{sud2026moving,
title = {{Moving beyond the neutral-Darwinian dichotomy to inform precision oncology}},
author = {Amit Sud and Richard S. Houlston},
journal = {NPJ Precision Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1038/s41698-026-01606-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01606-8},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Moving beyond the neutral-Darwinian dichotomy to inform precision oncology
AU - Amit Sud
AU - Richard S. Houlston
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/10
JO - NPJ Precision Oncology
DO - 10.1038/s41698-026-01606-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01606-8
AB - Current methods for distinguishing neutral from selection-driven tumour evolution rely on assumptions frequently violated in clinical samples. We argue that tumour evolution is not a binary state, but a dynamic continuum shaped by genetic and non-genetic heterogeneity, spatial constraints, microenvironmental pressures and therapeutic bottlenecks. Refining evolutionary inference through integrative, longitudinal and spatially resolved analyses will be essential to align these models with therapeutic decision-making in precision oncology.
SN - 2397-768X
ER -