Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCEnvironmental Science : Atmospheres
A comparative study of methods for calculating the oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter
Abstract
Assessment of oxidative potential variability using four calculation methods (CC1, CC2, CURVE, ABS) on PM samples. OP outcomes vary by method, influenced by blank correction and DTT/AA assay kinetics.
Related
- Quantifying the Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Metal–Organic Complexation on Particulate Matter Oxidative Potential via Redox Kinetics
- The representativeness of observed Δt in calculating formation and growth rates of newly formed atmospheric particles – hypothesis and examination
- The ARTMIP Tier 2 Polar Synthesis: A comparative analysis of polar atmospheric river detection tools in historical and future climate states
- A Quasi-Michaelis-Menten Mechanism Explains the Nonlinear Relationship between Transition Metals and PM2.5 Oxidative Potential Measured by the Dithiothreitol (DTT) Assay.
- Unraveling the Different Drivers of PM 2.5 Mass and Oxidative Potential at Two Sites of Southern Italy
BibTeX
@article{souza2026comparative,
title = {{A comparative study of methods for calculating the oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter}},
author = {Eduardo José dos Santos Souza and Gaëlle Uzu and Khanneh Wadinga Fomba and Pamela Dominutti and Takoua Mhadhbi and Jean-Luc Jaffrezo and Hartmut Herrmann},
journal = {Environmental Science : Atmospheres},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1039/d5ea00025d},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05794059v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A comparative study of methods for calculating the oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter
AU - Eduardo José dos Santos Souza
AU - Gaëlle Uzu
AU - Khanneh Wadinga Fomba
AU - Pamela Dominutti
AU - Takoua Mhadhbi
AU - Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
AU - Hartmut Herrmann
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Environmental Science : Atmospheres
DO - 10.1039/d5ea00025d
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05794059v1
AB - Assessment of oxidative potential variability using four calculation methods (CC1, CC2, CURVE, ABS) on PM samples. OP outcomes vary by method, influenced by blank correction and DTT/AA assay kinetics.
SN - 2634-3606
ER -