Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Ambio

Characterising people–species–place relationships

  1. 1School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Churchill Avenue, Sandy Bay, Hobart, TAS 7005 Australia
  2. 2Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
  3. 3College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, Townsville, QLD 4814 Australia

Abstract

Place attachments are multifaceted, reflecting personal meaning, and lived experiences. People also develop strong connections with species that inhabit beloved places. Yet, where places and species are experienced together, little is known about how these attachments intersect or vary across species. Here, we explored attachments to place and species, focusing on fairy penguins (Eudyptula minor) and muttonbirds (Ardenna tenuirostris) in their coastal habitat at an iconic Tasmanian landmark (Bruny Island). Using a mixed-methods approach, we examined these relationships through a modified Inclusion of Self Scale (n = 93) and interviews (n = 28). Species–place relationships, defined as the perceived belonging of a species to a place, emerged as the strongest predictor of place attachment. Qualitative insights revealed species–specific pathways, with connections strengthened when species contributed in both ecological and cultural ways. Recognising these diverse pathways offers a more nuanced understanding of how people–place relationships are formed and sustained.

Graphical abstract:

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0.

Related

  1. Understanding, expanding and sustaining UK treescapes: People, place and nature in a changing world
    Julie Urquhart, Alice Goodenough, Deirdre Heddon +1
    People and NaturePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Allometric scaling relationships of biomass for six common understory species in French temperate forests
    Claire Populus, Anders Mårell, Nathalie Korboulewsky
    Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Characterising Methane Concentration Variability at Coal Stockpiles in a Surface Coal Mine
    Rohan Anand, Akshansha Chauhan, Simit Raval
    EarthArXivPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeneral earth scienceEarthArXiv
  4. Resonant photoelectron spectroscopy: a tool for characterising the electronic properties of catalysts in operation
    C. Hachemi, M. Rivera-Salazar, L. Cardenas
    Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC1 citedCatalysisEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Characterising roadside ecosystems using the SEEA Ecosystem Condition Typology: towards a core set of biophysical variables
    Ziadany Mayoral Solis, Clémence Chaudron, Brunelle Marche +1
    One EcosystemPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{shum2026characterising,
  title = {{Characterising people–species–place relationships}},
  author = {Edith Shum and Vanessa M. Adams and Georgina G. Gurney},
  journal = {Ambio},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Characterising people–species–place relationships
AU  - Edith Shum
AU  - Vanessa M. Adams
AU  - Georgina G. Gurney
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/23
JO  - Ambio
DO  - 10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0
AB  - Place attachments are multifaceted, reflecting personal meaning, and lived experiences. People also develop strong connections with species that inhabit beloved places. Yet, where places and species are experienced together, little is known about how these attachments intersect or vary across species. Here, we explored attachments to place and species, focusing on fairy penguins (Eudyptula minor) and muttonbirds (Ardenna tenuirostris) in their coastal habitat at an iconic Tasmanian landmark (Bruny Island). Using a mixed-methods approach, we examined these relationships through a modified Inclusion of Self Scale (n = 93) and interviews (n = 28). Species–place relationships, defined as the perceived belonging of a species to a place, emerged as the strongest predictor of place attachment. Qualitative insights revealed species–specific pathways, with connections strengthened when species contributed in both ecological and cultural ways. Recognising these diverse pathways offers a more nuanced understanding of how people–place relationships are formed and sustained.  Graphical abstract:  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02411-0.
SN  - 0044-7447
SN  - 1654-7209
ER  -