Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Principal Component Regression Dominates all Monotone Spectral Filters for Linear Regression

Abstract

We compare the instance-wise, finite-sample risks of monotone spectral filters for linear regression, a broad class of estimators including principal component regression (PCR), gradient descent (GD), and ridge regression. We show that PCR dominates all monotone spectral filters: compared to any such filter, the risk of optimally tuned PCR is no bigger by a constant factor for all problems. Furthermore, the dominance is strong if the filter is separated from step functions (e.g., GD and ridge): there exist problem instances for which the risk of PCR is smaller by a polynomial factor in sample size dependence. Our comparison results show that PCR is optimal and thus admissible among monotone filters, significantly extending Wu et al. (2026)'s result that GD strongly dominates ridge. From a technical perspective, we establish new upper and lower bounds for general spectral filters, which are instance-wise sharp when specialized to ridge or GD, recovering or improving the best-known bounds.

Related

  1. Variable-Projection Sparse Functional Principal Component Analysis: Interpretable Functional Dimensionality Reduction with Applications to Raman Spectral Data
    Han Ying Lim, Dharini Pathmanathan, Philipp Otto +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Principal component analysis in Φ α-linear spaces
    Cassandra Mussard, Walter Briec, Charles Condevaux +1
    Journal of Big DataPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDStatisticsHAL
  3. Robust Multi-Task Learning for Principal Component Analysis
    Dali Liu, Haolei Weng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Functional Principal Component Analysis for Manifold-Indexed Data
    Chang Jun Im, Jeong Min Jeon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Robust Principal Component Analysis via ℓ0 Alternating Minimization
    Ze-Kun Lyu, Xin Liu, Qian-Yu Shu +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026principal,
  title = {{Principal Component Regression Dominates all Monotone Spectral Filters for Linear Regression}},
  author = {Juno Kim and Hengyu Fu and Peter Bartlett and Jason D. Lee and Jingfeng Wu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.39440},
  eprint = {2609.39440},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39440},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Principal Component Regression Dominates all Monotone Spectral Filters for Linear Regression
AU  - Juno Kim
AU  - Hengyu Fu
AU  - Peter Bartlett
AU  - Jason D. Lee
AU  - Jingfeng Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39440
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39440
AB  - We compare the instance-wise, finite-sample risks of monotone spectral filters for linear regression, a broad class of estimators including principal component regression (PCR), gradient descent (GD), and ridge regression. We show that PCR dominates all monotone spectral filters: compared to any such filter, the risk of optimally tuned PCR is no bigger by a constant factor for all problems. Furthermore, the dominance is strong if the filter is separated from step functions (e.g., GD and ridge): there exist problem instances for which the risk of PCR is smaller by a polynomial factor in sample size dependence. Our comparison results show that PCR is optimal and thus admissible among monotone filters, significantly extending Wu et al. (2026)'s result that GD strongly dominates ridge. From a technical perspective, we establish new upper and lower bounds for general spectral filters, which are instance-wise sharp when specialized to ridge or GD, recovering or improving the best-known bounds.
ER  -