Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDAnnals of hematology

When platelets reach a million: insights from hematologists.

  1. 1Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Fatih, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  2. 2Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Fatih, Istanbul, Türkiye. [email protected].
  3. 3Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Türkiye. [email protected].

Abstract

The management of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and extreme thrombocytosis (ExT) remains plagued by several unresolved issues. Therefore, we conducted a web-based survey to better understand hematologists' clinical approaches to ExT and to compare them with responses generated by artificial intelligence (AI) programs. A total of 56 hematologists participated. Cytoreductive treatment was preferred by 41.1% of respondents at a platelet threshold of ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L and by 83.9% at ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L. Assessment of vWF: RCo at diagnosis was reported by 78.6% of hematologists. In the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and the absence of acquired von Willebrand disease (vWD), aspirin therapy was favored by 91.1% and 78.6% of respondents for platelet counts ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L and ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L, respectively. Prevention of thrombosis, prevention of bleeding, and symptom control were cited with similar frequencies as reasons for initiating cytoreductive treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated recommendations supported vWF testing, favored cytoreductive treatment, particularly at platelet counts ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L, and generally recommended aspirin only for patients with platelet counts ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L in the absence of acquired vWD. Overall, ExT appeared to be an important driver of treatment decisions, particularly at platelet counts ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L. Comparisons with AI-generated recommendations revealed few differences in treatment approaches across some clinical scenarios, supporting the exploratory nature of the AI analysis.

Related

  1. 11 million days of longitudinal Fitbit data reveal novel future health insights
    Evelynne S. Fulda, Bennett J. Waxse, Slavina B. Goleva +11
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  2. Knowledge, attitudes, and use of artificial intelligence among adult and pediatric hematologists in Türkiye: a national cross-sectional survey.
    Olgu Erkin Çınar, Hilmi Erdem Gözden, Özlen Balta +1
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Platelets in sickle cell disease: biomarkers, mediators, and lessons from clinical trials
    Joanne C. Alfred, Erica M. Sparkenbaugh
    Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasisPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelets)-Associated Subcapsular Hepatic Hematoma Presenting as Postoperative Hemorrhagic Shock: A Case Report
    Julia Grossi Diaz, Karolyne Vale de Sá, Sarah Tanios Daneluzzi +5
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  5. The use of cold-stored platelets to provide hemostasis in dogs with thrombocytopenia.
    Shannon A Monaco, Jillian M Haines, Sarah C Guess +2
    Journal of veterinary internal medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sonmez2026when,
  title = {{When platelets reach a million: insights from hematologists.}},
  author = {Özge Sönmez and Ahmet Emre Eşkazan},
  journal = {Annals of hematology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1007/s00277-026-07183-x},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42961495},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - When platelets reach a million: insights from hematologists.
AU  - Özge Sönmez
AU  - Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
JO  - Annals of hematology
DO  - 10.1007/s00277-026-07183-x
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42961495
AB  - The management of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and extreme thrombocytosis (ExT) remains plagued by several unresolved issues. Therefore, we conducted a web-based survey to better understand hematologists' clinical approaches to ExT and to compare them with responses generated by artificial intelligence (AI) programs. A total of 56 hematologists participated. Cytoreductive treatment was preferred by 41.1% of respondents at a platelet threshold of ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L and by 83.9% at ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L. Assessment of vWF: RCo at diagnosis was reported by 78.6% of hematologists. In the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and the absence of acquired von Willebrand disease (vWD), aspirin therapy was favored by 91.1% and 78.6% of respondents for platelet counts ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L and ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L, respectively. Prevention of thrombosis, prevention of bleeding, and symptom control were cited with similar frequencies as reasons for initiating cytoreductive treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated recommendations supported vWF testing, favored cytoreductive treatment, particularly at platelet counts ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L, and generally recommended aspirin only for patients with platelet counts ≥ 1000 × 10⁹/L in the absence of acquired vWD. Overall, ExT appeared to be an important driver of treatment decisions, particularly at platelet counts ≥ 1500 × 10⁹/L. Comparisons with AI-generated recommendations revealed few differences in treatment approaches across some clinical scenarios, supporting the exploratory nature of the AI analysis.
SN  - 0939-5555
SN  - 1432-0584
ER  -