Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Study on the construction and application effect of discharge preparation services in heart valve replacement surgery

  1. 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a discharge preparation service (DPS) for patients after heart valve replacement surgery.

Method: This retrospective cohort study included 323 patients who underwent heart valve replacement surgery between February 2023 and January 2025. A multidisciplinary DPS plan was developed using a modified Delphi method and implemented in clinical practice. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 110 patients receiving DPS and 110 receiving usual care were analyzed. RHDS and QDTS were assessed at discharge; CSMS, CCQQ, and NSNS were assessed at discharge and at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Linear mixed models examined time, group, and time × group interactions.

Results: All items in the DPS plan were agreed upon by experts (average importance score ≥4.0, coefficient of variation ≤0.25), with a Kendall's coefficient of concordance W value of 0.925 ( P < 0.001), and the expert authority coefficient was 0.914. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups ( P > 0.05, standardized mean difference <0.1). Compared with controls, the DPS group had significantly higher RHDS and QDTS scores at discharge ( P < 0.05). For CSMS, CCQQ, and NSNS, time × group interactions were significant [CSMS: F(2,436) = 77.73; CCQQ: F(2,436) = 93.92; NSNS: F(2,436) = 67.53; all P < 0.001], indicating steeper improvement trajectories with DPS. At 6 months after discharge, the interaction estimates were 11.23 (95% CI 9.23–13.23) for CSMS, 15.61 (95% CI 13.36–17.86) for CCQQ, and 10.40 (95% CI 8.60–12.20) for NSNS (all P < 0.001). DPS was associated with lower unplanned readmission (6.36% vs. 15.45%, P = 0.031) and lower total complications (25.45% vs. 59.09%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The systematic, multidisciplinary DPS plan was associated with significant improvements in discharge readiness, self-management ability, and quality of life, as well as lower rates of unplanned readmissions and complications after heart valve replacement surgery.

Related

  1. Discharge preparation experiences of intergenerational caregivers for premature infants in China's NICU: a qualitative study.
    Sijia Shen, Ling Jiang, Yuelan Ma +2
    BMJ paediatrics openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  2. Transcriptomic Reproducibility in Endometrial Biopsies: Evidence Across Cycles and Tissue Regions in Hormonal Replacement Therapy Endometrial Preparation Protocols
    A. Martinez-Martinez, P. Sebastian-Leon, A. Parraga-Leo +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  3. Construction and implantation of a modified trileaflet polytetrafluoroethylene valved conduit for pulmonary valve replacement
    Abel Getachew, Nikita Zadneulitca, Ashok Muralidaran +2
    JTCVS techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Construction of an evaluation index system for nurse-led discharge planning competence in patients with chronic heart failure based on the iceberg model.
    Jie Chen, Yuqing Wang, Haotian Zhang +5
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Construction and application of a multidisciplinary collaborative in⁃hospital glucose management model based on the SIBIONICS® continuous glucose monitoring system
    ZHANG Jinfeng, ZHAO Mengjie, LI Jia
    Huli yanjiuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026study,
  title = {{Study on the construction and application effect of discharge preparation services in heart valve replacement surgery}},
  author = {Chunyan Zhang and Huan Yu and Wei Zhai and Lili Zhang and Ting Zhang and Yuanyuan Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1879911},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1879911/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Study on the construction and application effect of discharge preparation services in heart valve replacement surgery
AU  - Chunyan Zhang
AU  - Huan Yu
AU  - Wei Zhai
AU  - Lili Zhang
AU  - Ting Zhang
AU  - Yuanyuan Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1879911
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1879911/full
AB  - Objective: To develop and evaluate a discharge preparation service (DPS) for patients after heart valve replacement surgery.  Method: This retrospective cohort study included 323 patients who underwent heart valve replacement surgery between February 2023 and January 2025. A multidisciplinary DPS plan was developed using a modified Delphi method and implemented in clinical practice. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 110 patients receiving DPS and 110 receiving usual care were analyzed. RHDS and QDTS were assessed at discharge; CSMS, CCQQ, and NSNS were assessed at discharge and at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Linear mixed models examined time, group, and time × group interactions.  Results: All items in the DPS plan were agreed upon by experts (average importance score ≥4.0, coefficient of variation ≤0.25), with a Kendall's coefficient of concordance W value of 0.925 ( P < 0.001), and the expert authority coefficient was 0.914. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups ( P > 0.05, standardized mean difference <0.1). Compared with controls, the DPS group had significantly higher RHDS and QDTS scores at discharge ( P < 0.05). For CSMS, CCQQ, and NSNS, time × group interactions were significant [CSMS: F(2,436) = 77.73; CCQQ: F(2,436) = 93.92; NSNS: F(2,436) = 67.53; all P < 0.001], indicating steeper improvement trajectories with DPS. At 6 months after discharge, the interaction estimates were 11.23 (95% CI 9.23–13.23) for CSMS, 15.61 (95% CI 13.36–17.86) for CCQQ, and 10.40 (95% CI 8.60–12.20) for NSNS (all P < 0.001). DPS was associated with lower unplanned readmission (6.36% vs. 15.45%, P = 0.031) and lower total complications (25.45% vs. 59.09%, P < 0.001).  Conclusion: The systematic, multidisciplinary DPS plan was associated with significant improvements in discharge readiness, self-management ability, and quality of life, as well as lower rates of unplanned readmissions and complications after heart valve replacement surgery.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -