Investigating the Interacting Mechanisms of Precast Intersecting Cracks in Concrete: Insights from the Simulations Based on Discrete Element Method.
8 affiliations
- 1The Fifth Geological Brigade of Jiangxi Geological Bureau, Xinyu 338000, China.
- 2College of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
- 3State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Ecology Protection in Open-Pit Coal Mines, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
- 4School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China.
- 5Ying'er Command Center, Dongxin Oil Production Plant Shengli Oilfield, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, China.
- 6College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
- 7East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330000, China.
- 8School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.
Abstract
Underground mines often use shotcrete and reinforced concrete as support. Excavation disturbance, in situ stress, and blasting cause initial fractures to propagate. Intersecting fractures are common. This paper studies how intersecting fracture geometry affects fracture propagation under uniaxial compression. DEM and Particle Flow Code (PFC2D, Particle Flow Code) are used to build mesoscopic models with single-intersecting fractures (30-150°) and double-intersecting fractures with five offset levels: Zero, Minor, Moderate, Substantial, and Maximum. For single-intersecting fractures, smaller angles cause stronger shear slip and more multi-source cracking. Peak stress, ultimate strain, and final crack number (defined as the sum of tensile and shear micro-cracks from parallel-bond failure) increase. Larger angles lead to brittle failure and weaker properties. For double-intersecting fractures, bearing capacity first increases then stabilizes with offset. Zero and Minor offset have lower strength; Moderate, Substantial, and Maximum offset have higher capacity. Crack number increases with offset. Maximum offset has the most cracks but the smallest ultimate strain, while Substantial offset has the largest, with deformation from shear slip and higher brittle failure risk. Double-intersecting fracture specimens have fewer cracks but more concentrated damage and weaker properties than single-fracture specimens. This indicates damage distribution, not crack number, governs degradation. This study reveals how fracture configuration controls concrete response, providing mechanistic references for understanding failure behaviors related to safety-analysis and reinforcement-oriented research.
Related
- Investigating the coincidence problem with Interacting Dark Energy Models
- Strong-lensing perturber signatures in self-interacting dark matter simulations
- Investigating Interacting Fermionic Models with Locality-Preserving Qubit Encodings
- Fibre-Reinforced Concrete at Elevated Temperatures: Damage Mechanisms, Spalling, and Residual Performance
- Novel prefabricated joints for underground silos with steel cavity and concrete-filled cavity: Axial compression tests and numerical simulations
BibTeX
@article{yu2026investigating,
title = {{Investigating the Interacting Mechanisms of Precast Intersecting Cracks in Concrete: Insights from the Simulations Based on Discrete Element Method.}},
author = {Yuexing Yu and Wenxin Li and Zhiwei Sun and Liang Liu and Zhiyong Zhang and Runlin Luo and Xianzheng Zhu and Shuyang Yu},
journal = {Materials (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3390/ma19194097},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882597},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Investigating the Interacting Mechanisms of Precast Intersecting Cracks in Concrete: Insights from the Simulations Based on Discrete Element Method.
AU - Yuexing Yu
AU - Wenxin Li
AU - Zhiwei Sun
AU - Liang Liu
AU - Zhiyong Zhang
AU - Runlin Luo
AU - Xianzheng Zhu
AU - Shuyang Yu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/24
JO - Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/ma19194097
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882597
AB - Underground mines often use shotcrete and reinforced concrete as support. Excavation disturbance, in situ stress, and blasting cause initial fractures to propagate. Intersecting fractures are common. This paper studies how intersecting fracture geometry affects fracture propagation under uniaxial compression. DEM and Particle Flow Code (PFC2D, Particle Flow Code) are used to build mesoscopic models with single-intersecting fractures (30-150°) and double-intersecting fractures with five offset levels: Zero, Minor, Moderate, Substantial, and Maximum. For single-intersecting fractures, smaller angles cause stronger shear slip and more multi-source cracking. Peak stress, ultimate strain, and final crack number (defined as the sum of tensile and shear micro-cracks from parallel-bond failure) increase. Larger angles lead to brittle failure and weaker properties. For double-intersecting fractures, bearing capacity first increases then stabilizes with offset. Zero and Minor offset have lower strength; Moderate, Substantial, and Maximum offset have higher capacity. Crack number increases with offset. Maximum offset has the most cracks but the smallest ultimate strain, while Substantial offset has the largest, with deformation from shear slip and higher brittle failure risk. Double-intersecting fracture specimens have fewer cracks but more concentrated damage and weaker properties than single-fracture specimens. This indicates damage distribution, not crack number, governs degradation. This study reveals how fracture configuration controls concrete response, providing mechanistic references for understanding failure behaviors related to safety-analysis and reinforcement-oriented research.
SN - 1996-1944
ER -