Outcome-Specific Performance of HALP, AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford, and Rockall Scores in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa 63300, Türkiye
- 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Mehmet Akif İnan Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa 63300, Türkiye
- 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir 21070, Türkiye
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The Hemoglobin–Albumin–Lymphocyte–Platelet (HALP) score integrates hematologic, nutritional, immune, and platelet parameters, but its prognostic value in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains uncertain. We compared the performance of HALP with AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford Score (GBS), and Rockall scores. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adults with endoscopy-confirmed UGIB presenting to the emergency department from January 2021 through December 2024. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 h, and composite severe UGIB, defined as ≥2 PRBC units transfused within 24 h or UGIB-related intensive care unit admission. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve (AUCs); pairwise comparisons used the correlated-sample DeLong test. Firth-penalized logistic regression assessed the adjusted association between HALP and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 209 patients, 24 (11.5%) died and 36 (17.2%) had variceal bleeding. For mortality, AUCs were 0.580 for inverse HALP, 0.802 for AIMS65, 0.733 for GBS, and 0.731 for Rockall. For 24-h PRBC transfusion, AUCs were 0.629, 0.642, 0.814, and 0.511, respectively; for severe UGIB, they were 0.622, 0.594, 0.781, and 0.501. No statistically significant adjusted association between HALP and mortality was observed (aOR, 0.91 per 10-point increase; p = 0.571). Conclusions: HALP showed limited discrimination across the evaluated UGIB outcomes, and no statistically significant adjusted association with mortality was observed. AIMS65 had the highest observed AUC point estimate for mortality, although its AUC did not differ significantly from those of GBS or Rockall. GBS had the highest AUCs for PRBC transfusion and severe UGIB. These findings support outcome-specific selection of UGIB risk scores and do not support the use of HALP as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool without external validation.
Related
- Comparative performance of pre- and post-endoscopic risk scores for outcome prediction in endoscopy-confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department : A retrospective single-center study
- Early emergency department risk signals in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: The hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio
- On-Device ECG and Vital-Sign Prediction of 24-Hour Mortality and Unplanned ICU Admission in Emergency Department Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation of MEDI-AI
- Low-risk Features of Emergency Department Patients on a Sepsis Pathway: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Associations between use of targeted therapies, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits among patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{barut2026outcomespecific,
title = {{Outcome-Specific Performance of HALP, AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford, and Rockall Scores in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study}},
author = {Esat Barut and İbrahim Halil Yasak and Eyyup Sabri Şeyhanlı and Ramazan Giden and Kemal Barut},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15208196},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8196},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Outcome-Specific Performance of HALP, AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford, and Rockall Scores in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU - Esat Barut
AU - İbrahim Halil Yasak
AU - Eyyup Sabri Şeyhanlı
AU - Ramazan Giden
AU - Kemal Barut
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15208196
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8196
AB - Background/Objectives: The Hemoglobin–Albumin–Lymphocyte–Platelet (HALP) score integrates hematologic, nutritional, immune, and platelet parameters, but its prognostic value in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains uncertain. We compared the performance of HALP with AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford Score (GBS), and Rockall scores. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adults with endoscopy-confirmed UGIB presenting to the emergency department from January 2021 through December 2024. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 h, and composite severe UGIB, defined as ≥2 PRBC units transfused within 24 h or UGIB-related intensive care unit admission. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve (AUCs); pairwise comparisons used the correlated-sample DeLong test. Firth-penalized logistic regression assessed the adjusted association between HALP and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 209 patients, 24 (11.5%) died and 36 (17.2%) had variceal bleeding. For mortality, AUCs were 0.580 for inverse HALP, 0.802 for AIMS65, 0.733 for GBS, and 0.731 for Rockall. For 24-h PRBC transfusion, AUCs were 0.629, 0.642, 0.814, and 0.511, respectively; for severe UGIB, they were 0.622, 0.594, 0.781, and 0.501. No statistically significant adjusted association between HALP and mortality was observed (aOR, 0.91 per 10-point increase; p = 0.571). Conclusions: HALP showed limited discrimination across the evaluated UGIB outcomes, and no statistically significant adjusted association with mortality was observed. AIMS65 had the highest observed AUC point estimate for mortality, although its AUC did not differ significantly from those of GBS or Rockall. GBS had the highest AUCs for PRBC transfusion and severe UGIB. These findings support outcome-specific selection of UGIB risk scores and do not support the use of HALP as a stand-alone risk-stratification tool without external validation.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -