Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Abstract

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates mechanistic knowledge, typically through partial differential equations (PDEs), into data-driven models. Despite strong empirical performance, its statistical generalisation properties remain poorly understood, especially for regression with unbounded losses. We develop a PAC-Bayesian framework for PIML that provides high-probability generalisation guarantees under potentially unbounded losses. Exploiting the structure of physics-informed objectives, we derive component-wise bounds whose complexity scales with the input-gradient energy of each loss, establishing a direct link between physical regularity and generalisation. We further introduce a PAC-Bayesian calibration procedure that yields computable gradient-based complexities while controlling rare large-gradient events through a residual-tail correction. Adopting a multi-task view of data fidelity, PDE residuals, initial conditions, and boundary conditions, we obtain a refined certificate with a single PAC-Bayesian complexity penalty, avoiding the looseness of independently bounding each component. Building on this certificate, we propose a bound-aware learning procedure that promotes empirical accuracy, proximity to a physics-informed prior, and low input-gradient complexity. Experiments on six PDE benchmarks yield substantially tighter certificates than bounded-loss and sub-Gaussian alternatives, while ablations quantify the effects of posterior-training data, calibration data, gradient envelopes, and hypothesis localisation.

Related

  1. Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification
    Christian Soize
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification
    Christian Soize
    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsGeneral physicsHAL
  3. QD-PINN:A Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach to Bayesian Quickest Detection in High-Dimensional Diffusions
    Hang Ye, Yi Liu, Haipeng Xing
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Autoregressive Physics-Informed Neural Operator Surrogates and Joint 4-D Seismic-Production Bayesian History Matching
    Clement Etienam, David Blom, Hari Pattathil +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Comparison of neural and spline representations for physics-informed learning
    Régis Duvigneau
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026pacbayesian,
  title = {{A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learning}},
  author = {Thien V. Nguyen and Amaury Habrard and Benjamin Guedj},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.26341},
  eprint = {2605.26341},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26341},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A PAC-Bayesian View of Generalisation for Physics-Informed Machine Learning
AU  - Thien V. Nguyen
AU  - Amaury Habrard
AU  - Benjamin Guedj
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.26341
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26341
AB  - Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates mechanistic knowledge, typically through partial differential equations (PDEs), into data-driven models. Despite strong empirical performance, its statistical generalisation properties remain poorly understood, especially for regression with unbounded losses. We develop a PAC-Bayesian framework for PIML that provides high-probability generalisation guarantees under potentially unbounded losses. Exploiting the structure of physics-informed objectives, we derive component-wise bounds whose complexity scales with the input-gradient energy of each loss, establishing a direct link between physical regularity and generalisation. We further introduce a PAC-Bayesian calibration procedure that yields computable gradient-based complexities while controlling rare large-gradient events through a residual-tail correction. Adopting a multi-task view of data fidelity, PDE residuals, initial conditions, and boundary conditions, we obtain a refined certificate with a single PAC-Bayesian complexity penalty, avoiding the looseness of independently bounding each component. Building on this certificate, we propose a bound-aware learning procedure that promotes empirical accuracy, proximity to a physics-informed prior, and low input-gradient complexity. Experiments on six PDE benchmarks yield substantially tighter certificates than bounded-loss and sub-Gaussian alternatives, while ablations quantify the effects of posterior-training data, calibration data, gradient envelopes, and hypothesis localisation.
ER  -