Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Multi-objective optimization of light guide column injection molding process using RSM and NSGA‑II with numerical verification

  1. 1Anhui Technical College of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Power, Hefei, China.

Abstract

Injection molding technology involves fully melting plastic material through screw agitation at a specific temperature, injecting it into the mold cavity under high pressure, and obtaining the molded part after cooling and solidification. Injection molding offers high production efficiency while meeting the molding demands of complex plastic components. However, enhancing the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded parts has become a critical aspect of this process. The injection-molded components of the XG-99Q2 light guide column were selected as the subject of this study. Initially, three runner system designs were created: “Wang” shape, ‘Gong’ shape, and “Yi” shape configurations. Each design underwent process analysis for its respective injection molding process. Subsequently, six fundamental injection parameters were identified, and an L32 orthogonal experimental design was employed to systematically investigate their effects on two critical objectives: plastic volume shrinkage and warpage deformation. The experimental design incorporated signal-to-noise ratio processing, with weights for total warpage and volume shrinkage derived using the entropy weight method. This approach facilitated qualitative analysis of gray correlation coefficients and correlations among identified factors, revealing significant relationships between injection time, holding pressure, and melt temperature. Prediction models for warpage and shrinkage were developed using the Box-Behnken experimental design from response surface methodology, providing a foundation for comprehensive quantitative analysis. Additionally, the NSGA-II algorithm was applied to multi-objective optimization, yielding a set of Pareto optimal solutions. Finally, the reliability of the method was verified through simulation based validation.

Related

  1. Effect of Injection Molding on the Performance of EDTAD-Functionalized Oat Protein Bioplastics as Water-Absorbent Materials
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  2. Liquid Silicone Rubber Injection Molding: A Review of Material–Process–Quality Relationships
    Weimin Yang, Pengfei Zhang, Guannan Ren +3
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  3. Optimization of the Composite Formulation for Rotational Molding Based on Recycled Polyethylene and Antioxidants
    Vitaliy Tyukanko, Roman Tarunin, Alexandr Demyanenko +7
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  4. Quantifying Multi-Objective Optimization in Generative Chemistry for Molecule Design
    Paula Torren-Peraire, Nadine Schneider, Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez +2
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  5. Bi–O–S Catalyst for Enhanced CO2 Electroreduction to Formic Acid: Catalyst–Substrate Engineering and Multi-Objective Optimization
    Mithra Geetha, Zeyad M. Ghazi, Muhammad Arsalan +1
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{xu2026multiobjective,
  title = {{Multi-objective optimization of light guide column injection molding process using RSM and NSGA‑II with numerical verification}},
  author = {Huajun Xu},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361371},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361371},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multi-objective optimization of light guide column injection molding process using RSM and NSGA‑II with numerical verification
AU  - Huajun Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361371
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361371
AB  - Injection molding technology involves fully melting plastic material through screw agitation at a specific temperature, injecting it into the mold cavity under high pressure, and obtaining the molded part after cooling and solidification. Injection molding offers high production efficiency while meeting the molding demands of complex plastic components. However, enhancing the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded parts has become a critical aspect of this process. The injection-molded components of the XG-99Q2 light guide column were selected as the subject of this study. Initially, three runner system designs were created: “Wang” shape, ‘Gong’ shape, and “Yi” shape configurations. Each design underwent process analysis for its respective injection molding process. Subsequently, six fundamental injection parameters were identified, and an L32 orthogonal experimental design was employed to systematically investigate their effects on two critical objectives: plastic volume shrinkage and warpage deformation. The experimental design incorporated signal-to-noise ratio processing, with weights for total warpage and volume shrinkage derived using the entropy weight method. This approach facilitated qualitative analysis of gray correlation coefficients and correlations among identified factors, revealing significant relationships between injection time, holding pressure, and melt temperature. Prediction models for warpage and shrinkage were developed using the Box-Behnken experimental design from response surface methodology, providing a foundation for comprehensive quantitative analysis. Additionally, the NSGA-II algorithm was applied to multi-objective optimization, yielding a set of Pareto optimal solutions. Finally, the reliability of the method was verified through simulation based validation.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -