Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Peri-transplant eculizumab for preventing antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients at high immunologic risk: a systematic review with design-stratified evidence synthesis

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
  2. 2West China Medical School, Sichuan University
  3. 3Kidney Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
  4. 4Organ Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Abstract

Introduction: Highly sensitized candidates, preformed donor-specific antibodies, and ABO incompatibility restrict access to kidney transplantation and increase antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) risk. We systematically evaluated peri-transplant eculizumab-containing prophylaxis in high-immunologic-risk kidney transplantation.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Europe PMC, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Ovid CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and supplementary sources; database searches ended 10 June 2026, and registry searches ended 20 August 2026.

Results: A total of 31 reports were included; 30 were linked to 14 studies or registry projects, and one pathology report was retained qualitatively. In the only randomized trial, centrally confirmed AMR occurred in 5/51 recipients in both the eculizumab and standard-desensitization groups [risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–3.25]. A historical comparison reported AMR in 2/26 versus 21/51 recipients (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.74), but treatment era, post-transplant plasma exchange, and clinical management changed concurrently. An 80-recipient single-arm study reported three AMR events by week 9. Long-term follow-up showed no consistent graft-survival or kidney-function advantage, while persistent donor-specific antibodies and chronic microvascular injury remained evident.

Discussion: Eculizumab can provide terminal complement blockade within selected combination prophylaxis, but randomized evidence does not establish an incremental reduction in AMR. Definitive trials require standardized background therapy, rescue criteria, long-term graft outcomes, and infection surveillance. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261484542).

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , identifier CRD420261484542.

Related

  1. Virologic and Exploratory Immunologic Characterization of Relapsing Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNAemia in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
    Open forum infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Association of eplet mismatch load and allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients
    Clinical kidney journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. The Tell-Tale Heart ― Persistent Immune Activation in Histologically Rejection-Free Heart Transplant Recipients ―
    Toshiyuki Ko, Hiroyuki Morita
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaJ-STAGE
  4. Retrospective evaluation of predictors and clinical impact of postoperative delirium in liver transplant recipients
    Chunjiao Long, Huan Lin, Qi-Quan Wan
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Clinicopathologic Features and Diagnostic Challenges of Mycophenolate Mofetil-Associated Enterocolitis in Lung Transplant Recipients
    Lucy Shen, Yanping Wang, Andreas Kontosis +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{liang2026peritransplant,
  title = {{Peri-transplant eculizumab for preventing antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients at high immunologic risk: a systematic review with design-stratified evidence synthesis}},
  author = {Chengze Liang and Rong Bao and Saifu Yin and Turun Song and Tao Lin},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982870},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982870/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Peri-transplant eculizumab for preventing antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients at high immunologic risk: a systematic review with design-stratified evidence synthesis
AU  - Chengze Liang
AU  - Rong Bao
AU  - Saifu Yin
AU  - Turun Song
AU  - Tao Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982870
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982870/full
AB  - Introduction: Highly sensitized candidates, preformed donor-specific antibodies, and ABO incompatibility restrict access to kidney transplantation and increase antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) risk. We systematically evaluated peri-transplant eculizumab-containing prophylaxis in high-immunologic-risk kidney transplantation.  Methods: We searched PubMed, Europe PMC, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Ovid CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and supplementary sources; database searches ended 10 June 2026, and registry searches ended 20 August 2026.  Results: A total of 31 reports were included; 30 were linked to 14 studies or registry projects, and one pathology report was retained qualitatively. In the only randomized trial, centrally confirmed AMR occurred in 5/51 recipients in both the eculizumab and standard-desensitization groups [risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–3.25]. A historical comparison reported AMR in 2/26 versus 21/51 recipients (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.74), but treatment era, post-transplant plasma exchange, and clinical management changed concurrently. An 80-recipient single-arm study reported three AMR events by week 9. Long-term follow-up showed no consistent graft-survival or kidney-function advantage, while persistent donor-specific antibodies and chronic microvascular injury remained evident.  Discussion: Eculizumab can provide terminal complement blockade within selected combination prophylaxis, but randomized evidence does not establish an incremental reduction in AMR. Definitive trials require standardized background therapy, rescue criteria, long-term graft outcomes, and infection surveillance. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261484542).  Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , identifier CRD420261484542.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -