Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Impact of antenatal education on vaginal birth and cesarean rates in a secondary care setting

Abstract

Cesarean section rates are rising globally, often exceeding recommended levels and posing risks for maternal and neonatal health. Beyond clinical indications, behavioral and informational factors such as fear of childbirth, misconceptions, risk perception, and provider influence can shape delivery preferences. Antenatal education programmes address these determinants by improving knowledge, reducing fear, and supporting informed decision-making. However, evidence from routine health service settings remains limited, particularly on their contribution to reducing primary cesarean sections. This practice-based analysis used routine delivery data from 2025 in a secondary care hospital in Türkiye. Women were categorized according to attendance to antenatal education programmes. The objective was to evaluate whether participation was associated with delivery mode. Vaginal birth rates, cesarean section rates, and primary cesarean section rates were compared between attendees and non-attendees in routine care. Vaginal birth was more common among women who attended antenatal education programmes than among non-attendees (58.2% vs 42.1%), while cesarean section rates were lower in the education group (41.8% vs 57.9%). The difference was notable for primary cesarean sections, which were less frequent among attendees (19.0% vs 32.4%). These findings suggest that antenatal education may support vaginal birth and help reduce first-time cesarean deliveries in routine care. Antenatal education programmes may serve as a scalable, low-cost intervention to support informed delivery decisions and reduce unnecessary cesarean sections. By addressing fear, knowledge gaps, expectations, and misconceptions, these programmes may help prevent the cesarean cascade. Integrating antenatal education into routine maternal care could support sustainable, woman-centered, and evidence-informed childbirth practices in similar settings seeking to optimize delivery outcomes.

Key messages: • Antenatal education was associated with higher vaginal birth rates and lower primary cesarean rates in a real-world hospital setting.

• Scaling antenatal education programmes may reduce unnecessary cesarean sections by improving decision-making and reducing fear of childbirth.

Related

  1. Interpretation of the ERAS Society's "Guidelines for antenatal and postoperative care in cesarean delivery:2025 update"
    JIANG Yiwei, CHENG Xiangwei, ZHAO Chong +4
    Huli yanjiuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Comparison of Metronidazole Gel and Povidone‑Iodine for Vaginal Preparation in Preventing Post‑Cesarean Infection‑Related Morbidity: A Three‑Group Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fatemeh Davodabadi, Hamideh Parsapour, Behzad Imani +2
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Effects of BeBo® Pelvic Floor Muscle Training with and Without Electromyographic Biofeedback After Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Paulina Handzlik-Waszkiewicz, Iwona Sulowska-Daszyk, Agnieszka Suder
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Factor structure and psychometric validation of the antenatal exercise knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire : A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from Saudi Arabian pregnant women
    Abdullah Hussain Alzahrani, Wael Alghamdi
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Efficacy of chlorhexidine vaginal preparation in reducing postoperative infections during emergency cesarean deliveries for women in labor: a randomized controlled trial
    Hytham Atia, Abdelrahman Saleh, Mohamed Ibrahim +1
    BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{soganda2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of antenatal education on vaginal birth and cesarean rates in a secondary care setting}},
  author = {S Y Soganda and Y Sayin and Y E Bulut},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1729},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1729},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of antenatal education on vaginal birth and cesarean rates in a secondary care setting
AU  - S Y Soganda
AU  - Y Sayin
AU  - Y E Bulut
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1729
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1729
AB  - Cesarean section rates are rising globally, often exceeding recommended levels and posing risks for maternal and neonatal health. Beyond clinical indications, behavioral and informational factors such as fear of childbirth, misconceptions, risk perception, and provider influence can shape delivery preferences. Antenatal education programmes address these determinants by improving knowledge, reducing fear, and supporting informed decision-making. However, evidence from routine health service settings remains limited, particularly on their contribution to reducing primary cesarean sections. This practice-based analysis used routine delivery data from 2025 in a secondary care hospital in Türkiye. Women were categorized according to attendance to antenatal education programmes. The objective was to evaluate whether participation was associated with delivery mode. Vaginal birth rates, cesarean section rates, and primary cesarean section rates were compared between attendees and non-attendees in routine care. Vaginal birth was more common among women who attended antenatal education programmes than among non-attendees (58.2% vs 42.1%), while cesarean section rates were lower in the education group (41.8% vs 57.9%). The difference was notable for primary cesarean sections, which were less frequent among attendees (19.0% vs 32.4%). These findings suggest that antenatal education may support vaginal birth and help reduce first-time cesarean deliveries in routine care. Antenatal education programmes may serve as a scalable, low-cost intervention to support informed delivery decisions and reduce unnecessary cesarean sections. By addressing fear, knowledge gaps, expectations, and misconceptions, these programmes may help prevent the cesarean cascade. Integrating antenatal education into routine maternal care could support sustainable, woman-centered, and evidence-informed childbirth practices in similar settings seeking to optimize delivery outcomes.  Key messages: • Antenatal education was associated with higher vaginal birth rates and lower primary cesarean rates in a real-world hospital setting.  • Scaling antenatal education programmes may reduce unnecessary cesarean sections by improving decision-making and reducing fear of childbirth.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -