Effectiveness of a community health literacy intervention: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Health literacy is a major public health challenge and a key determinant of socioeconomic health inequalities. Although health literacy interventions hold promise, the evidence remains limited, particularly interventions targeting individuals with limited health literacy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a co-created, community-based health literacy intervention for adults in the Netherlands.
Methods: A pragmatic stepped‑wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted, using questionnaire data collected at four time points over 9 months. The intervention, consisting of group sessions on positive health, was delivered across five municipalities. Intervention effects were estimated using mixed-effects models. The primary outcome was positive health consisting of six domains: physical health, mental health, participation, quality of life, daily functioning and meaningfulness. Secondary outcomes included health literacy and health- and social care-related quality of life.
Results: In total, 100 participants were enrolled in the study (83% women, mean age: 55.7) of whom 89 received the intervention. No significant effects were found on the domains of positive health, health literacy (β = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.65, 0.83]), social care-related quality of life (β = 0.070, 95% CI [−0.016, 0.155]) and health-related quality of life (β = 0.035, 95% CI [−0.027, 0.098]). Notably, only 25% of the sample was classified as having limited health literacy at baseline.
Conclusions: Although no statistically significant effects were observed, the improvement in social care-related quality of life may still be clinically relevant (9.3%). The absence of significant findings may be explained by limited statistical power and challenges in reaching the intended population with limited health literacy. Further research is needed to assess the intervention’s effectiveness, with particular attention to targeted recruitment and retention in complex designs such as stepped wedge trials.
Key messages: • A community-based health literacy intervention showed no statistically significant effects on positive health, with a possible improvement in social care-related quality of life.
• Evaluating community‑based interventions with priority populations requires substantial time and resources for recruitment and retention particularly with complex designs such as stepped‑wedge trials.
Related
- Maintaining Quality of Genetic Counseling Services While Maximizing Efficiency: Protocol for the GC‐PRO Intervention Stepped‐Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
- Effectiveness of a Community-Based Cervical Cancer Stigma Reduction Intervention on Cancer Stigma and Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Nepal: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
- Teacher-delivered transdiagnostic child mental healthcare in rural Indian primary schools (Tealeaf): study protocol for a batched stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation-context design.
- Early impact of the Liberian National Community Health Assistant Program on under-five mortality in Grand Bassa County: A non-randomized stepped wedge evaluation
- Effectiveness of multipronged intervention on knowledge and attitude regarding health risk behaviors and prevention among Indian adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial
BibTeX
@article{koelmans2026effectiveness,
title = {{Effectiveness of a community health literacy intervention: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial}},
author = {I Koelmans and L Ter Beek and CM Renders and GA De Wit and IHM Steenhuis and JM Van Dongen},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.787},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.787},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effectiveness of a community health literacy intervention: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
AU - I Koelmans
AU - L Ter Beek
AU - CM Renders
AU - GA De Wit
AU - IHM Steenhuis
AU - JM Van Dongen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.787
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.787
AB - Background: Health literacy is a major public health challenge and a key determinant of socioeconomic health inequalities. Although health literacy interventions hold promise, the evidence remains limited, particularly interventions targeting individuals with limited health literacy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a co-created, community-based health literacy intervention for adults in the Netherlands. Methods: A pragmatic stepped‑wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted, using questionnaire data collected at four time points over 9 months. The intervention, consisting of group sessions on positive health, was delivered across five municipalities. Intervention effects were estimated using mixed-effects models. The primary outcome was positive health consisting of six domains: physical health, mental health, participation, quality of life, daily functioning and meaningfulness. Secondary outcomes included health literacy and health- and social care-related quality of life. Results: In total, 100 participants were enrolled in the study (83% women, mean age: 55.7) of whom 89 received the intervention. No significant effects were found on the domains of positive health, health literacy (β = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.65, 0.83]), social care-related quality of life (β = 0.070, 95% CI [−0.016, 0.155]) and health-related quality of life (β = 0.035, 95% CI [−0.027, 0.098]). Notably, only 25% of the sample was classified as having limited health literacy at baseline. Conclusions: Although no statistically significant effects were observed, the improvement in social care-related quality of life may still be clinically relevant (9.3%). The absence of significant findings may be explained by limited statistical power and challenges in reaching the intended population with limited health literacy. Further research is needed to assess the intervention’s effectiveness, with particular attention to targeted recruitment and retention in complex designs such as stepped wedge trials. Key messages: • A community-based health literacy intervention showed no statistically significant effects on positive health, with a possible improvement in social care-related quality of life. • Evaluating community‑based interventions with priority populations requires substantial time and resources for recruitment and retention particularly with complex designs such as stepped‑wedge trials.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -