Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Co-evolution of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host L* galaxies: implications for Milky Way and M31

Abstract

We investigate the origin of the scatter in supermassive black hole (BH) masses among L* galaxies, using the ARTEMIS and EAGLE simulations. We classify galaxies by their central BH-to-stellar mass ratios and track systems with the lowest and highest ratios (LBH and HBH, respectively). Although these populations have similar properties at z~ 2, they diverge significantly towards lower redshifts. LBH galaxies maintain higher gas fractions and sustain star formation, while HBHs form stars earlier, experience faster BH growth, more efficient feedback, and subsequent quenching. The simulations broadly match the observed scatter in the BH masses and galaxy morphologies in the L* regime, linking it to differences in merger histories. Galaxies with more active merger histories host more massive BHs at present and are predominantly elliptical, whereas those with quieter histories host lower-mass BHs and tend to be disc-like. Mergers induce BH growth through enhanced gas accretion and direct BH-BH coalescences. However, these channels operate differently: in HBH galaxies, BHs grow primarily (~90%) through gas accretion, whereas in LBHs they grow through both gas accretion and BH--BH mergers, in comparable fractions. These results suggest that the contrasting BH masses in the Milky Way and M31 may arise from differences in their merger histories. We also investigate the role of feedback from supernovae (SN) versus active galactic nuclei (AGN) on these scales. AGN feedback appears to be the primary mechanism responsible for quenching MW-mass systems, although SN feedback remains the dominant regulator of their overall evolution.

Versions

Related

  1. Star–Disk Collisions. II. Debris Stream Dynamics and Implications for Quasiperiodic Eruptions and Other Transients Near Supermassive Black Holes
    Philippe Z. Yao, Eliot Quataert, Yan-Fei 燕飞 Jiang 姜 +1
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsIOP/AASCrossref
  2. Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes. III. Mass Distribution of Hierarchical Mergers
    Katherine L. Gonglewski, Amy Secunda, Mordecai-Mark Mac Low +3
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsIOP/AASCrossref
  3. Odds Estimation for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Local Core Galaxies
    C. J. Harris, Kayhan Gültekin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Magnetized Accretion Flows with Low Angular Momentum Around Supermassive Black Holes
    Razieh Ranjbar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  5. Bridging the Population Synthesis of Supermassive Binary Black Holes and the Gravitational Wave Background
    Kanyuni Iemoto, Boris Goncharov, Gabriela Sato-Polito +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{grimozzi2026coevolution,
  title = {{Co-evolution of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host L* galaxies: implications for Milky Way and M31}},
  author = {Salvador E. Grimozzi and Maria Emilia De Rossi and Andreea S. Font},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.16501},
  eprint = {2605.16501},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16501},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Co-evolution of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host L* galaxies: implications for Milky Way and M31
AU  - Salvador E. Grimozzi
AU  - Maria Emilia De Rossi
AU  - Andreea S. Font
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.16501
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16501
AB  - We investigate the origin of the scatter in supermassive black hole (BH) masses among L* galaxies, using the ARTEMIS and EAGLE simulations. We classify galaxies by their central BH-to-stellar mass ratios and track systems with the lowest and highest ratios (LBH and HBH, respectively). Although these populations have similar properties at z~ 2, they diverge significantly towards lower redshifts. LBH galaxies maintain higher gas fractions and sustain star formation, while HBHs form stars earlier, experience faster BH growth, more efficient feedback, and subsequent quenching. The simulations broadly match the observed scatter in the BH masses and galaxy morphologies in the L* regime, linking it to differences in merger histories. Galaxies with more active merger histories host more massive BHs at present and are predominantly elliptical, whereas those with quieter histories host lower-mass BHs and tend to be disc-like. Mergers induce BH growth through enhanced gas accretion and direct BH-BH coalescences. However, these channels operate differently: in HBH galaxies, BHs grow primarily (~90%) through gas accretion, whereas in LBHs they grow through both gas accretion and BH--BH mergers, in comparable fractions. These results suggest that the contrasting BH masses in the Milky Way and M31 may arise from differences in their merger histories. We also investigate the role of feedback from supernovae (SN) versus active galactic nuclei (AGN) on these scales. AGN feedback appears to be the primary mechanism responsible for quenching MW-mass systems, although SN feedback remains the dominant regulator of their overall evolution.
ER  -