Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Decoder-Prior Poisoning in Quantum Error Correction: Attacks and PriorGuard Defense

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) protects quantum computations by repeatedly measuring stabilizer syndromes and using a classical decoder to infer corrections. Modern surface-code decoders are increasingly calibration-aware: they use recent device behavior to set priors such as matching-graph edge probabilities, and these priors directly shape the selected correction. We identify the prior-update path as an overlooked integrity-critical attack surface: a poisoned prior can change decoding decisions even when the syndrome stream, logical labels, and decoder implementation are unchanged. This makes prior poisoning different from ordinary syndrome anomalies and difficult for raw syndrome-anomaly tests to detect. We introduce PriorGuard, a lightweight semantic guard that checks proposed prior changes on high-influence detector-graph entries against private syndrome-derived evidence, accepts updates only when their log-odds movement is evidence-supported, and otherwise falls back to the last evidence-supported prior. We evaluate on Stim-generated rotated surface-code memory circuits decoded with PyMatching. Prior influence is highly concentrated, with the top 10 percent of entries carrying over 60 percent of positive logical-error influence; poisoning only 6.4 percent of decoder-prior entries can raise logical error rate (LER) by 3.35x. PriorGuard recovers most attack-induced loss with a low false-positive rate and modest update-boundary overhead of about 1.7--1.8 ms and less than 0.31 MB auxiliary memory per update.

Related

  1. Capability-Gated Conformance Testing of Quantum Error-Correction Decoder Libraries
    Jiachen Shen, Hui Zhong
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Trinetra.Q: Statistical and Behavioral Detection of Attacks on the Quantum-Error-Correction Layer and Classical Control Stack of Quantum Computing Systems
    Garrv Sipani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Distilling Knowledge from Search: Decoder Model Factory for Quantum LDPC Codes
    Anil Bilgin, Wanda Hou, Pranav Srinivas +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Real-time decoder for a MegaQuOp quantum computer using a single CPU
    Min Ye, Andrii Maksymov, Nicolas Delfosse
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Doubly-polylog-time-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation by a polylog-time parallel minimum-weight perfect matching decoder
    Yugo Takada, Hayata Yamasaki
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{li2026decoderprior,
  title = {{Decoder-Prior Poisoning in Quantum Error Correction: Attacks and PriorGuard Defense}},
  author = {Xinyi Li and Yifeng Peng and Juntao Chen and Ying Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.27805},
  eprint = {2609.27805},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27805},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Decoder-Prior Poisoning in Quantum Error Correction: Attacks and PriorGuard Defense
AU  - Xinyi Li
AU  - Yifeng Peng
AU  - Juntao Chen
AU  - Ying Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.27805
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27805
AB  - Quantum error correction (QEC) protects quantum computations by repeatedly measuring stabilizer syndromes and using a classical decoder to infer corrections. Modern surface-code decoders are increasingly calibration-aware: they use recent device behavior to set priors such as matching-graph edge probabilities, and these priors directly shape the selected correction. We identify the prior-update path as an overlooked integrity-critical attack surface: a poisoned prior can change decoding decisions even when the syndrome stream, logical labels, and decoder implementation are unchanged. This makes prior poisoning different from ordinary syndrome anomalies and difficult for raw syndrome-anomaly tests to detect. We introduce PriorGuard, a lightweight semantic guard that checks proposed prior changes on high-influence detector-graph entries against private syndrome-derived evidence, accepts updates only when their log-odds movement is evidence-supported, and otherwise falls back to the last evidence-supported prior. We evaluate on Stim-generated rotated surface-code memory circuits decoded with PyMatching. Prior influence is highly concentrated, with the top 10 percent of entries carrying over 60 percent of positive logical-error influence; poisoning only 6.4 percent of decoder-prior entries can raise logical error rate (LER) by 3.35x. PriorGuard recovers most attack-induced loss with a low false-positive rate and modest update-boundary overhead of about 1.7--1.8 ms and less than 0.31 MB auxiliary memory per update.
ER  -