Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,937 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Regional summaries of Bayesian model uncertainty

Abstract

Bayesian posterior uncertainty can be spread across many models that share the same substantive pattern. Lists of individual models can obscure this structure, while marginal summaries do not describe which configurations are jointly supported. We study how to represent joint model uncertainty through a compact collection of interpretable regions, each grouping models that share a specified pattern. We formulate this task as minimizing representation complexity subject to retaining a prescribed posterior mass within an analyst-supplied family. To address unknown regional probabilities, we develop Adaptive Regional Selection (ARS), which combines adaptive exploration and regional weight estimation with conservative and optimistic selection. These complementary problems identify a summary meeting the mass target and bound how much further its complexity could improve. Under valid regional bounds, we establish guarantees for retained mass, total-variation error, and suboptimality, together with conditions for certifying optimality. We also show that, under bounded within-region weight variation, sufficient sample counts for regional estimation need not grow with the number of represented models, and construct bounds that remain valid under adaptive sampling and stopping. Empirical studies illustrate regional summaries in Bayesian model averaging and Bayesian networks, examining retained mass, representation complexity, and certification.

Related

  1. A Bayesian Distance-Weighted Ising Model for Task-Related Regional Analysis of Neuroimaging Data
    Heesang Lee, Jongrak Park, Seoyoung Choi +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A general method for estimating reliability using Bayesian Measurement Uncertainty
    Giacomo Bignardi, Rogier Kievit, Paul-Christian Bürkner
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsOSF
  3. Emulation strategies for Bayesian inference of regional left ventricle material parameters
    Hongjin Ren, Vinny Davies, Hao Gao +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Online Bayesian Model Averaging with Joint Uncertainty Quantification for Models and Regression Coefficients in Binary Regression
    Joyee Ghosh, Aixin Tan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Enhanced Uncertainty Quantification Variational Autoencoders for the Solution of Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Andrea Tonini, Luca Dede’
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{li2026regional,
  title = {{Regional summaries of Bayesian model uncertainty}},
  author = {Hanqing Li and Robert Nguyen and Xuewen Lu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.21080},
  eprint = {2606.21080},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21080},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Regional summaries of Bayesian model uncertainty
AU  - Hanqing Li
AU  - Robert Nguyen
AU  - Xuewen Lu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.21080
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21080
AB  - Bayesian posterior uncertainty can be spread across many models that share the same substantive pattern. Lists of individual models can obscure this structure, while marginal summaries do not describe which configurations are jointly supported. We study how to represent joint model uncertainty through a compact collection of interpretable regions, each grouping models that share a specified pattern. We formulate this task as minimizing representation complexity subject to retaining a prescribed posterior mass within an analyst-supplied family. To address unknown regional probabilities, we develop Adaptive Regional Selection (ARS), which combines adaptive exploration and regional weight estimation with conservative and optimistic selection. These complementary problems identify a summary meeting the mass target and bound how much further its complexity could improve. Under valid regional bounds, we establish guarantees for retained mass, total-variation error, and suboptimality, together with conditions for certifying optimality. We also show that, under bounded within-region weight variation, sufficient sample counts for regional estimation need not grow with the number of represented models, and construct bounds that remain valid under adaptive sampling and stopping. Empirical studies illustrate regional summaries in Bayesian model averaging and Bayesian networks, examining retained mass, representation complexity, and certification.
ER  -