Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC 4.0EcoEvoRxiv

Weeds are plants of human-modified environments, not plants out of place

Abstract

The question “What makes a plant a weed?” has persisted in both the agricultural sciences and plant ecology and evolution for well over a hundred years. Various authors—agriculturists focused on crop yield, ecologists examining community assembly, and plant biologists interested in adaptation—have each defined the term weed. However, these definitions, developed from unique vantage points, have led to siloed studies and thus constraints on our understanding of weedy plant evolution. Here we briefly review how weeds have been defined historically and argue that weeds are best defined by the environment they occupy: plants that are found, uncultivated and reproducing, in human-modified environments. We then ask whether weeds are human commensals, populations that depend on human-provided resources and have diverged from non-commensal ancestors, treating human dependence as a gradient to be measured. We highlight critical gaps in our understanding of weedy plant occurrence across agricultural, suburban, and urban environments, and propose a database approach leading to testable hypotheses for studying weed presence and persistence. Important outcomes of our reframing include a bridge between agricultural and (sub)urban research disciplines and a shared, data-driven basis for comparing species across the human-modified environments they occupy, illuminating the forces that underlie the weedy lifestyle.

Related

  1. Animals or plants? Evolutionary branching of sessile versus mobile cognitive agents in noisy environments
    J. Pla-Mauri, R. Sole
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  2. Plants and mammals once tracked climate closely, then mammal niches shifted under human pressure
    C. Gibert Bret, B. R. Shipley, J. A. Schap +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Same place, different time: Leopards (Panthera pardus kotiya) employ temporal partitioning as a co-existence mechanism in a human-dominated, unprotected agricultural landscape in Sri Lanka
    Andrew M. Kittle, Anjali C. Watson
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
  4. An integrated genome-wide resource reveals distinct replication environments of DNA breakage in human cancer cell lines
    P.-C. Wei, B. Ding, A. Ing +7
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  5. Genome-wide conservation and locus-specific coding variation in Teratoramularia rumicicola, a candidate microbial herbicide for Rumex weeds
    M. Izumi, T. Oka
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{baucom2026weeds,
  title = {{Weeds are plants of human-modified environments, not plants out of place}},
  author = {Regina S Baucom and Emily Josephs},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.32942/x20x2p},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15836/},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Weeds are plants of human-modified environments, not plants out of place
AU  - Regina S Baucom
AU  - Emily Josephs
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x20x2p
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15836/
AB  - The question “What makes a plant a weed?” has persisted in both the agricultural sciences and plant ecology and evolution for well over a hundred years. Various authors—agriculturists focused on crop yield, ecologists examining community assembly, and plant biologists interested in adaptation—have each defined the term weed. However, these definitions, developed from unique vantage points, have led to siloed studies and thus constraints on our understanding of weedy plant evolution. Here we briefly review how weeds have been defined historically and argue that weeds are best defined by the environment they occupy: plants that are found, uncultivated and reproducing, in human-modified environments. We then ask whether weeds are human commensals, populations that depend on human-provided resources and have diverged from non-commensal ancestors, treating human dependence as a gradient to be measured. We highlight critical gaps in our understanding of weedy plant occurrence across agricultural, suburban, and urban environments, and propose a database approach leading to testable hypotheses for studying weed presence and persistence. Important outcomes of our reframing include a bridge between agricultural and (sub)urban research disciplines and a shared, data-driven basis for comparing species across the human-modified environments they occupy, illuminating the forces that underlie the weedy lifestyle.
ER  -