Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Refutable Exclusion Restrictions in Competing Risks with Categorical Covariates

Abstract

Competing-risks data do not identify latent marginal duration distributions or their dependence without additional restrictions. This paper asks whether restrictions introduced to restore identification themselves restrict the observable law. For a two-risk Archimedean model with categorical exclusion restrictions, we derive a necessary-and-sufficient observable characterization. A discrete single-crossing argument identifies the scalar copula parameter from cell-specific overall survival probabilities, while cause indicators recover the remaining allocation and generate additional specification restrictions. We construct an identification-robust, self-normalized quadratic statistic, invert it to obtain confidence sets, and use empty inverted sets as a conservative specification test. Simulations show that the cause indicator can be decisive: under the weakest contrast considered it converts a frequently uninformative survival-based confidence set into an informative joint set without loss of coverage, whereas excessive categorical contrast can eliminate causes from individual cells and make cause-specific recovery inadmissible. The results turn latent exclusion restrictions into refutable restrictions without estimating covariate derivatives.

Related

  1. Simultaneous comparison of the predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of categorical covariates
    Jose A. Roldan-Nofuentes, Saad-Bouh Regad
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with many covariates
    Harold D. Chiang, Yukitoshi Matsushita, Taisuke Otsu
    Journal of EconometricsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated13 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Kernel Density Regression Estimation with Covariates on Riemannian Manifolds
    Gharbi Rihab, Salah Khardani, Mohamed Abdillahi Isman +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsHAL
  4. Entity Ranking with Covariates and Sparse Intrinsic Scores
    Jianqing Fan, Jikai Hou, Mengxin Yu
    Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not stated13 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  5. Brauer--Manin obstruction for Weil restrictions
    Hui Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{akhmedov2026refutable,
  title = {{Refutable Exclusion Restrictions in Competing Risks with Categorical Covariates}},
  author = {Isfandiyor Akhmedov},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28866},
  eprint = {2609.28866},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28866},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Refutable Exclusion Restrictions in Competing Risks with Categorical Covariates
AU  - Isfandiyor Akhmedov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28866
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28866
AB  - Competing-risks data do not identify latent marginal duration distributions or their dependence without additional restrictions. This paper asks whether restrictions introduced to restore identification themselves restrict the observable law. For a two-risk Archimedean model with categorical exclusion restrictions, we derive a necessary-and-sufficient observable characterization. A discrete single-crossing argument identifies the scalar copula parameter from cell-specific overall survival probabilities, while cause indicators recover the remaining allocation and generate additional specification restrictions. We construct an identification-robust, self-normalized quadratic statistic, invert it to obtain confidence sets, and use empty inverted sets as a conservative specification test. Simulations show that the cause indicator can be decisive: under the weakest contrast considered it converts a frequently uninformative survival-based confidence set into an informative joint set without loss of coverage, whereas excessive categorical contrast can eliminate causes from individual cells and make cause-specific recovery inadmissible. The results turn latent exclusion restrictions into refutable restrictions without estimating covariate derivatives.
ER  -