Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Quantumness

Abstract

With the rapid development of quantum computers, proofs of quantumness have recently become an interesting research direction. However, in current schemes for proofs of quantumness, quantum provers face the risk of being maliciously exploited by classical verifiers. Through malicious strategies in interaction with quantum provers, classical verifiers could solve some instances of hard problems that arise from the specific scheme in use. This is due to the lack of formalization that prevents malicious verifiers from extracting useful information in proofs of quantumness. To address this issue, we formalize zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness. Intuitively, the zero-knowledge property necessitates that the information gained by the classical verifier from interactions with the quantum prover should not surpass what can be simulated using a simulated classical prover interacting with the same verifier. As a result, the new zero-knowledge notion can prevent a malicious verifier from exploiting quantum advantage. We find that the classical zero-knowledge proof is sufficient to compile some existing proofs of quantumness schemes into zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness schemes. It appears to be more general to require zero-knowledge proof on the verifier side instead of the prover side. This helps to regulate the verifier's behavior from malicious to be honest-but-curious. As a result, both parties will play not only one role in the proofs of quantumness but also the dual role in the classical zero-knowledge proof. Specifically, Shor's factoring-based scheme and the learning with errors-based scheme in [Brakerski et al., FOCS, 2018] can be transformed into zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness by requiring an extractable non-interactive zero-knowledge argument on the verifier side. Zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness can thus be viewed as an enhanced security notion for proofs of quantumness.

Versions

Related

  1. Zero Knowledge Proofs in Quantum Networks
    Tuhin Paul, Srijani Das, Manasi Patra +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Post-Quantum Perfect Zero-Knowledge Arguments for NP From Any One-Way Permutation
    Frédéric Dupuis, Rémi Ligez, Khaireddine Medhioub +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. How Quantum Is Light? Concepts, Measures, and Applications of Optical Quantumness
    Soumyakanti Bose, Hyukjoon Kwon, Yong Siah Teo +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Quantumness of Entanglement in Schwarzschild de Sitter Spacetime
    Sumeng Wang, Xiaofen Huang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Probing quantumness of superpositions of Gaussian states via Tsirelson probability
    Yue Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{phan2026zeroknowledge,
  title = {{Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Quantumness}},
  author = {Duong Hieu Phan and Weiqiang Wen and Xingyu Yan and Jinwei Zheng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23455},
  eprint = {2609.23455},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23455},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Quantumness
AU  - Duong Hieu Phan
AU  - Weiqiang Wen
AU  - Xingyu Yan
AU  - Jinwei Zheng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23455
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23455
AB  - With the rapid development of quantum computers, proofs of quantumness have recently become an interesting research direction. However, in current schemes for proofs of quantumness, quantum provers face the risk of being maliciously exploited by classical verifiers. Through malicious strategies in interaction with quantum provers, classical verifiers could solve some instances of hard problems that arise from the specific scheme in use. This is due to the lack of formalization that prevents malicious verifiers from extracting useful information in proofs of quantumness. To address this issue, we formalize zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness. Intuitively, the zero-knowledge property necessitates that the information gained by the classical verifier from interactions with the quantum prover should not surpass what can be simulated using a simulated classical prover interacting with the same verifier. As a result, the new zero-knowledge notion can prevent a malicious verifier from exploiting quantum advantage. We find that the classical zero-knowledge proof is sufficient to compile some existing proofs of quantumness schemes into zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness schemes. It appears to be more general to require zero-knowledge proof on the verifier side instead of the prover side. This helps to regulate the verifier's behavior from malicious to be honest-but-curious. As a result, both parties will play not only one role in the proofs of quantumness but also the dual role in the classical zero-knowledge proof. Specifically, Shor's factoring-based scheme and the learning with errors-based scheme in [Brakerski et al., FOCS, 2018] can be transformed into zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness by requiring an extractable non-interactive zero-knowledge argument on the verifier side. Zero-knowledge proofs of quantumness can thus be viewed as an enhanced security notion for proofs of quantumness.
ER  -