Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Restricted K- and τ-symmetries on multisoliton manifolds of the potential BKP and CKP equations

Abstract

We investigate the reduction of generalized K-symmetries and τ-symmetries on the multisoliton manifolds of the potential BKP and CKP hierarchies. The n-soliton solution of BKP depends on wave-number parameters km, transverse parameters lm, and phase parameters ξm0, defining a 3n-dimensional manifold. Its restricted K-symmetries project onto an n-dimensional phase-shift subspace, while the restricted τ-symmetries engage the full 3n-dimensional tangent space. This structure naturally yields a row-replacement determinant representation. In contrast, the n-soliton solution of CKP has no independent transverse parameters, reducing the manifold dimension to 2n. The restricted K-symmetries again form an n-dimensional phase-shift representation, but the τ-symmetries now involve only 2n tangent directions. For CKP, the natural formulation treats elementary tangent symmetries as unknowns, producing a column-replacement determinant representation via Cramer's rule. The difference between these two determinant structures reflects not a difference in the underlying linear algebra, but rather the distinct parameterizations of the two soliton manifolds. Both formulas express explicitly how infinite-dimensional symmetry hierarchies collapse onto finite-dimensional multisoliton families.

Related

  1. From infinite symmetries to multi-soliton manifolds: dispersion-driven reduction for the KP and mKP equations
    Xiazhi Hao, Mingxia Ji, Senyue Lou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Restricted triangular ice beyond the solvable manifolds: chiral ice and the critical region of dominant chiral vertices
    Josep Batle
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Generalized Symmetries of QED4 on Non-Spin Manifolds
    Michele Del Zotto, Vivek Saxena
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Discrete symmetries of modified Teukolsky equations
    Ciro De Simone
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Symmetries of the Generalized Yang--Baxter Equations
    Pramod Padmanabhan, Somnath Maity, Akash Sinha +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMathematical physicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hao2026restricted,
  title = {{Restricted $K$- and $τ$-symmetries on multisoliton manifolds of the potential BKP and CKP equations}},
  author = {Xiazhi Hao and Mingxia Ji and Senyue Lou},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.34960},
  eprint = {2610.34960},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34960},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Restricted K- and τ-symmetries on multisoliton manifolds of the potential BKP and CKP equations
AU  - Xiazhi Hao
AU  - Mingxia Ji
AU  - Senyue Lou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.34960
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34960
AB  - We investigate the reduction of generalized K-symmetries and τ-symmetries on the multisoliton manifolds of the potential BKP and CKP hierarchies. The n-soliton solution of BKP depends on wave-number parameters k_m, transverse parameters l_m, and phase parameters ξ_m0, defining a 3n-dimensional manifold. Its restricted K-symmetries project onto an n-dimensional phase-shift subspace, while the restricted τ-symmetries engage the full 3n-dimensional tangent space. This structure naturally yields a row-replacement determinant representation. In contrast, the n-soliton solution of CKP has no independent transverse parameters, reducing the manifold dimension to 2n. The restricted K-symmetries again form an n-dimensional phase-shift representation, but the τ-symmetries now involve only 2n tangent directions. For CKP, the natural formulation treats elementary tangent symmetries as unknowns, producing a column-replacement determinant representation via Cramer's rule. The difference between these two determinant structures reflects not a difference in the underlying linear algebra, but rather the distinct parameterizations of the two soliton manifolds. Both formulas express explicitly how infinite-dimensional symmetry hierarchies collapse onto finite-dimensional multisoliton families.
ER  -