Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries

Abstract

Whether quantum computation can reduce the amount of data required for conventional machine learning is a central problem in quantum machine learning. In probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, a learner receives training examples sampled from an unknown probability distribution. Quantum PAC learning extends this framework by allowing access to quantum examples, which are quantum states that coherently encode this distribution, or to unitaries that prepare quantum examples, with or without inverse access. When only copies of quantum examples are available, the optimal worst-case sample complexity asymptotically matches that of classical learning. In contrast, access to both a preparation unitary and its inverse can improve the accuracy dependence of query complexity. However, it has remained open whether access to the preparation unitary alone suffices for this improvement. In this work, we resolve this question by determining the optimal query complexity with forward-only access, taking the worst case over compatible preparation unitaries and their dimensions. In both realizable and agnostic PAC learning, this complexity matches, up to constant factors, the optimal sample complexity achievable with classical examples or copies of quantum examples. To prove these results, we construct, for any algorithm with forward-only access, a simulator that approximates the algorithm's Haar-averaged output state using as many copies of the prepared state as the algorithm makes queries. These results show that inverse access is essential for the known improvement in accuracy dependence in this worst-case setting. Beyond PAC learning, our reduction provides a general tool for transferring lower bounds for state copies to query lower bounds for forward-only access to the corresponding preparation unitaries.

Related

  1. Exact Operator Complexity Measures from Random Matchgate Unitaries
    Gregory A. L. White, Jens Eisert, Neil Dowling
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Beyond Light Cones: State Preparation Complexity in Quantum Spin Glasses
    Omar Al-Ghattas, David Gamarnik, Bobak T Kiani
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityCondensed matterarXiv
  3. The optimal information complexity of VC learning
    Steve Hanneke, Juexiao Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. On the Sample Complexity of Active Learning with Membership Queries
    Ganghua Wang, Shaddin Dughmi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Near-Optimal Sample Complexity for Recursive Entropic Risk Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
    Amirparsa Bahrami, Oliver Mortensen, Mohammad Sadegh Talebi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{isogai2026advantage,
  title = {{Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries}},
  author = {Natsuto Isogai and Satoshi Yoshida and Mio Murao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38403},
  eprint = {2609.38403},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38403},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries
AU  - Natsuto Isogai
AU  - Satoshi Yoshida
AU  - Mio Murao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38403
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38403
AB  - Whether quantum computation can reduce the amount of data required for conventional machine learning is a central problem in quantum machine learning. In probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, a learner receives training examples sampled from an unknown probability distribution. Quantum PAC learning extends this framework by allowing access to quantum examples, which are quantum states that coherently encode this distribution, or to unitaries that prepare quantum examples, with or without inverse access. When only copies of quantum examples are available, the optimal worst-case sample complexity asymptotically matches that of classical learning. In contrast, access to both a preparation unitary and its inverse can improve the accuracy dependence of query complexity. However, it has remained open whether access to the preparation unitary alone suffices for this improvement. In this work, we resolve this question by determining the optimal query complexity with forward-only access, taking the worst case over compatible preparation unitaries and their dimensions. In both realizable and agnostic PAC learning, this complexity matches, up to constant factors, the optimal sample complexity achievable with classical examples or copies of quantum examples. To prove these results, we construct, for any algorithm with forward-only access, a simulator that approximates the algorithm's Haar-averaged output state using as many copies of the prepared state as the algorithm makes queries. These results show that inverse access is essential for the known improvement in accuracy dependence in this worst-case setting. Beyond PAC learning, our reduction provides a general tool for transferring lower bounds for state copies to query lower bounds for forward-only access to the corresponding preparation unitaries.
ER  -