Are the Physiological Measures SpO ₂ and Heart Rate Biological Markers for Listening Effort and Fatigue?
- 1Department of AudiologyJagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara (JSS) Institute of Speech and HearingMysuruKarnatakaIndia.
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether physiological measures such as oxygen saturation (SpO ₂ ) and heart rate can reliably indicate listening effort and fatigue as well as possibly serve as objective alternatives to traditional subjective reports in the evaluation of the effects of digital noise reduction (DNR) in hearing aids.Methods
Through a repeated-measures design, we evaluated listening effort and fatigue in 35 participants with mild-to-moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss using hearing aids, under DNR-on and DNR-off conditions. The participants performed a dual task for us to assess listening effort and fatigue, and physiological data (SpO ₂ and heart rate) were recorded with a pulse oximeter during the pretask, task, and posttask phases. Subjective ratings of listening effort, fatigue, attention, and concentration were obtained via self-report scales to assess DNR effectiveness and physiological marker sensitivity.Results
In DNR on, a significantly-higher score on repetition and recall was observed, along with reduced listening effort and reaction time, compared with DNR off. The posttest scores showed that the participants reported significantly less listening effort and fatigue, with improved attention and concentration in DNR on than in the pretest, whereas the opposite was true in the off condition. A notable difference in heart rates was observed between the pre- and post-test phases in DNR on. The median SpO ₂ levels significantly increased from the pre- to the post-task phases, with a notable difference during the task phase as well. Additionally, a negative correlation was found between fatigue and SpO ₂ in DNR on, while a positive relationship was noted between attention and SpO ₂ in DNR off.Conclusion
Physiological measures, particularly SpO ₂ , show preliminary promise as potential objective markers of listening effort and fatigue, aligning with behavioral and subjective outcomes, but this requires further validation.
Related
- Fatigue-related changes in value-based decision-making during listening are associated with increased frontal cortical activation
- Objective markers of altered neural gain dissociate tinnitus and self-reported listening problems in individuals with exceptional hearing thresholds
- Intraindividual longitudinal changes of the proteome reveal dynamic markers of biological aging
- Reconciling intrinsic and ecosystem water-use efficiency reveals physiological mechanisms underlying carbon-water coupling across biological scales
- Prediction bias in biological ageing markers
BibTeX
@article{shetty2026physiological,
title = {{Are the Physiological Measures SpO ₂ and Heart Rate Biological Markers for Listening Effort and Fatigue?}},
author = {Hemanth Narayna Shetty and Amruthvarshini Bhaskar and Teja Govindaraju},
journal = {International archives of otorhinolaryngology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1055/s-0046-1827787},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921388},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Are the Physiological Measures SpO ₂ and Heart Rate Biological Markers for Listening Effort and Fatigue?
AU - Hemanth Narayna Shetty
AU - Amruthvarshini Bhaskar
AU - Teja Govindaraju
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - International archives of otorhinolaryngology
DO - 10.1055/s-0046-1827787
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921388
AB - Purpose To investigate whether physiological measures such as oxygen saturation (SpO ₂ ) and heart rate can reliably indicate listening effort and fatigue as well as possibly serve as objective alternatives to traditional subjective reports in the evaluation of the effects of digital noise reduction (DNR) in hearing aids.Methods Through a repeated-measures design, we evaluated listening effort and fatigue in 35 participants with mild-to-moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss using hearing aids, under DNR-on and DNR-off conditions. The participants performed a dual task for us to assess listening effort and fatigue, and physiological data (SpO ₂ and heart rate) were recorded with a pulse oximeter during the pretask, task, and posttask phases. Subjective ratings of listening effort, fatigue, attention, and concentration were obtained via self-report scales to assess DNR effectiveness and physiological marker sensitivity.Results In DNR on, a significantly-higher score on repetition and recall was observed, along with reduced listening effort and reaction time, compared with DNR off. The posttest scores showed that the participants reported significantly less listening effort and fatigue, with improved attention and concentration in DNR on than in the pretest, whereas the opposite was true in the off condition. A notable difference in heart rates was observed between the pre- and post-test phases in DNR on. The median SpO ₂ levels significantly increased from the pre- to the post-task phases, with a notable difference during the task phase as well. Additionally, a negative correlation was found between fatigue and SpO ₂ in DNR on, while a positive relationship was noted between attention and SpO ₂ in DNR off.Conclusion Physiological measures, particularly SpO ₂ , show preliminary promise as potential objective markers of listening effort and fatigue, aligning with behavioral and subjective outcomes, but this requires further validation.
SN - 1809-9777
SN - 1809-4864
ER -